Benchmark Almanac

ScreenSpot-Pro

GPT-6 Astra 92.7% leads since Sep 2026 In use

GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element.

Astra score known only from secondary write-ups of OpenAI launch materials.

In the authors’ words

Recent advancements in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have led to significant progress in developing GUI agents for general tasks such as web browsing and mobile phone use. However, their application in professional domains remains under-explored. These specialized workflows introduce unique challenges for GUI perception models, including high-resolution displays, smaller target sizes, and complex environments. In this paper, we introduce ScreenSpot-Pro, a new benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the grounding capabilities of MLLMs in high-resolution professional settings. The benchmark comprises authentic high-resolution images from a variety of professional domains with expert annotations. It spans 23 applications across five industries and three operating systems. Existing GUI grounding models perform poorly on this dataset, with the best model achieving only 18.9%. Our experiments reveal that strategically reducing the search area enhances accuracy. Based on this insight, we propose ScreenSeekeR, a visual search method that utilizes the GUI knowledge of a strong planner to guide a cascaded search, achieving state-of-the-art performance with 48.1% without any additional training. We hope that our benchmark and findings will advance the development of GUI agents for professional applications. Code, data and leaderboard can be found at https://gui-agent.github.io/grounding-leaderboard.

Abstract of ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use (arXiv:2504.07981, CC0)
Made by ScreenSpot-Pro authors Released Jan 2025 Finding things on screen All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
25
Models scored in lab cards
20
Launch posts list it, from 8 labs
14
System cards report it, from 8 labs

GPT-6 Astra leads with 92.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.8 87.9%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 87.6%
  4. 4 GPT-5.2 86.3%
  5. 5 Qwen 3.8 Max 84.5%
  6. 6 Muse Spark 84.1%
  7. 7 Claude Mythos Preview 79.5%
  8. 8 Qwen3.7-Plus 79%
  9. 9 Muse Glimmer 75.4%
  10. 10 Seed1.8 73.1%
  11. 11 Gemini 3 Pro 72.7%
  12. 12 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 70.4%
  13. 13 Gemini 3 Flash 69.1%
  14. 14 Qwen 3.6 Plus 68.2%
  15. 15 Fara1.5-27B 66.8%
  16. 16 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 65.6%
  17. 17 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 61.8%
  18. 18 UI-TARS-1.5 61.6%
  19. 19 Seed1.5-VL 60.9%
  20. 20 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 57.8%
  21. 21 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 52.8%
  22. 22 STEP3-VL-10B 51.5%
  23. 23 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 43.6%
  24. 24 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 43.5%
  25. 25 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 5.50%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 92.7% Sep 2026 Model card
2 Claude Opus 4.8 87.9% May 2026 Model card
3 Claude Opus 4.7 87.6% Apr 2026 Model card
4 GPT-5.2 86.3% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Qwen 3.8 Max 84.5% Aug 2026 Model card
6 Muse Spark 84.1% Apr 2026 Model card
7 Claude Mythos Preview 79.5% Apr 2026 Model card
8 Qwen3.7-Plus 79% Jun 2026 Model card
9 Muse Glimmer 75.4% Aug 2026 Model card
10 Seed1.8 73.1% Dec 2025 Model card
11 Gemini 3 Pro 72.7% Nov 2025 Model card
12 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 70.4% Feb 2026 Model card
13 Gemini 3 Flash 69.1% Dec 2025 Model card
14 Qwen 3.6 Plus 68.2% Apr 2026 Model card
15 Fara1.5-27B 66.8% Jun 2026 Model card
16 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 65.6% Feb 2026 Model card
17 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 61.8% Sep 2025 Model card
18 UI-TARS-1.5 61.6% Apr 2025 Model card
19 Seed1.5-VL 60.9% May 2025 Model card
20 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 57.8% Apr 2026 Model card
21 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 52.8% Jun 2025 Model card
22 STEP3-VL-10B 51.5% Jan 2026 Model card
23 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 43.6% Jan 2025 Model card
24 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 43.5% Oct 2026 Model card
25 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 5.50% Nov 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 97 entries, 11 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Z.ai Qwen ByteDance Seed Google DeepMind OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2025
UI-TARS-1.5 61.6%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Dec 2025, by GPT-5.2
GPT-6 Astra 92.7%

The best score passed 85% in Dec 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3 Pro Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Qwen2.5-VL-72B CogAgent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra GPT-5.2

3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
Google DeepMind
OpenAI
StepFun
Meta
Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra 92.7 ScreenSpot-Pro (no tools)
10 Aug 2026 Muse Glimmer 75.4 ScreenSpot Pro
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 84.5 ScreenSpot Pro
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 79 ScreenSpot Pro (enable_thinking=False)
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 87.9 ScreenSpot-Pro (with tools)
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 87.6 ScreenSpot-Pro (with tools)
8 Apr 2026 Muse Spark 84.1 ScreenSpot Pro (Screenshot Localization - With Python)
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 68.2 ScreenSpot Pro
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 70.4 ScreenSpot Pro
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 65.6 ScreenSpot Pro
13 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B 51.5 ScreenSpot-Pro
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 73.1 ScreenSpot-Pro 64.3 / 73.1 with crop-box tool
17 Dec 2025 Gemini 3 Flash 69.1 ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools unless specified)
11 Dec 2025 GPT-5.2 86.3 ScreenSpot-Pro GUI screenshot understanding (w/ Python)
18 Nov 2025 Gemini 3 Pro 72.7 ScreenSpot-Pro
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 61.8 ScreenSpot Pro
21 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 52.8 ScreenSpot-Pro (Acc)
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 60.9 ScreenSpot-Pro
16 Apr 2025 UI-TARS-1.5 61.6 ScreenSpotPro
28 Jan 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 43.6 ScreenSpot Pro

14 system cards report it, from 8 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 75.4 Screenspot Pro, high (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 43.5 ScreenSpot Pro, BF16 acc. (Table 23) Capabilities
18 Jun 2026 Fara1.5-27B technical report 66.8 ScreenSpot-Pro with two-step zoom, 58.6 without zoom (Table 6) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 82.3 ScreenSpot-Pro, no tools, max effort (87.9% with Python tools) (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.5) Capabilities
27 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 57.8 ScreenSpot-Pro, reasoning on, 59.3 reasoning off (Table 7) Capabilities
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 79.5 ScreenSpot-Pro, no tools. 87.6 with Python tools (Table 8.1.A, 8.9.3) Capabilities
7 Apr 2026 Claude Mythos Preview system card 79.5 ScreenSpot-Pro, adaptive thinking, max effort, no tools, average of five runs (6.11.2); 92.8 with Python tools Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 64.3 ScreenSpot-Pro 64.3, 73.1 with the crop-box tool (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 51.5 ScreenSpot-Pro, SeRe (Table 1) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 61.8 ScreenSpot Pro (Table 2) Capabilities
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 5.5 ScreenSpot-Pro, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 4.8 Capabilities
23 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report 52.8 ScreenSpot-Pro (Acc) (Table 5) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 60.9 ScreenSpot-Pro, thinking (Table 8) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 43.6 ScreenSpot Pro (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%
  • RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%