AndroidWorld
Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success.
Tasks take random parameters, so each run can create new task variants. On 2024-11-18 Google set each task step budget to about twice the human average time, so earlier scores used different limits.
In the authors’ words
Autonomous agents that execute human tasks by controlling computers can enhance human productivity and application accessibility. However, progress in this field will be driven by realistic and reproducible benchmarks. We present AndroidWorld, a fully functional Android environment that provides reward signals for 116 programmatic tasks across 20 real-world Android apps. Unlike existing interactive environments, which provide a static test set, AndroidWorld dynamically constructs tasks that are parameterized and expressed in natural language in unlimited ways, thus enabling testing on a much larger and more realistic suite of tasks. To ensure reproducibility, each task includes dedicated initialization, success-checking, and tear-down logic, which modifies and inspects the device's system state. We experiment with baseline agents to test AndroidWorld and provide initial results on the benchmark. Our best agent can complete 30.6% of AndroidWorld's tasks, leaving ample room for future work. Furthermore, we adapt a popular desktop web agent to work on Android, which we find to be less effective on mobile, suggesting future research is needed to achieve universal, cross-platform agents. Finally, we also conduct a robustness analysis, showing that task variations can significantly affect agent performance, demonstrating that without such testing, agent performance metrics may not fully reflect practical challenges. AndroidWorld and the experiments in this paper are available at github.com/google-research/android_world.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
2 models share the top score of 100%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 100.0 AGI-AW
- 100.0 gpt-4o / gpt-5.4
- 100.0 gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol
- 100.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 100.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 99.1 Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2
- 97.4 Seed1.8-GUI
- 97.4 Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite
- 94.8 askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet
- 94.8 gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5
- 93.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 91.4 Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano
- 88.8 -
- 87.1 o3 + holo1.5-72b
- 86.2 Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4
- 80.2 AutoGLM-Mobile
- 79.3 LX-GUIAgent
- 78.0 Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5
- 76.7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 76.7 MAI-UI-235B-A22B
- 75.0 Hammer-UI-32B
- 73.3
GUI-Owl-32B
- 73.3 MAI-UI-32B
- 70.7 MAI-UI-8B
- 69.7
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
- 67.2 JT-GUIAgent-V2
- 66.4
GUI-Owl-7B
- 65.9 UI-Venus-Navi-72B
- 62.9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 62.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 60.0 JT-GUIAgent-V1
- 59.5 V-Droid (Llama8B)
- 54.3 Agent S2
- 49.1 Venus-Navi-7B
- 49.1 MAI-UI-2B
- 46.6 UI-TARS
- 44.8 GPT-4o + Aria-UI
- 44.0 GPT-4o + UGround
- 44.0 ScaleTrack-7B
- 30.6 GPT-4 Turbo
- 27.6 GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct
- 27.6
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 9.00 Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned)
- 1 AGI-AW 100%
- 2 gpt-4o / gpt-5.4 100%
- 3 gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol 100%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra 100%
- 5 GPT-6 Sol 100%
- 6 Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2 99.1%
- 7 Seed1.8-GUI 97.4%
- 8 Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite 97.4%
- 9 askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet 94.8%
- 10 gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5 94.8%
- 11
Gemini 3.5 Flash 93.1%
- 12 Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano 91.4%
- 13 - 88.8%
- 14 o3 + holo1.5-72b 87.1%
- 15 Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4 86.2%
- 16 AutoGLM-Mobile 80.2%
- 17 LX-GUIAgent 79.3%
- 18 Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5 78%
- 19 Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B 76.7%
- 20 MAI-UI-235B-A22B 76.7%
- 21 Hammer-UI-32B 75%
- 22
GUI-Owl-32B 73.3%
- 23 MAI-UI-32B 73.3%
- 24 MAI-UI-8B 70.7%
- 25
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 69.7%
- 26 JT-GUIAgent-V2 67.2%
- 27
GUI-Owl-7B 66.4%
- 28 UI-Venus-Navi-72B 65.9%
- 29
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 62.9%
- 30
Seed1.5-VL 62.1%
- 31 JT-GUIAgent-V1 60%
- 32 V-Droid (Llama8B) 59.5%
- 33 Agent S2 54.3%
- 34 Venus-Navi-7B 49.1%
- 35 MAI-UI-2B 49.1%
- 36 UI-TARS 46.6%
- 37 GPT-4o + Aria-UI 44.8%
- 38 GPT-4o + UGround 44%
- 39 ScaleTrack-7B 44%
- 40 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 30.6%
- 41 GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 27.6%
- 42
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 27.6%
- 43 Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned) 9.00%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AGI-AW | 100% | AGI-0 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | gpt-4o / gpt-5.4 | 100% | Kirk Engine | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol | 100% | FluizAI | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 100% | MobileRun | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-6 Sol | 100% | agent-qa by Vostride AI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2 | 99.1% | Artemis | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Seed1.8-GUI | 97.4% | MobileUseAgent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite | 97.4% | Finalrun | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet | 94.8% | askui AndroidVisionAgent | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5 | 94.8% | AutoDevice | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 93.1% | Midscene.js | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano | 91.4% | mobile-use | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | - | 88.8% | Agent-Visco | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | o3 + holo1.5-72b | 87.1% | Surfer 2 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4 | 86.2% | gbox.ai | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | AutoGLM-Mobile | 80.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | LX-GUIAgent | 79.3% | LX-GUIAgent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5 | 78% | AgentProg | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B | 76.7% | K²-Agent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | MAI-UI-235B-A22B | 76.7% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Hammer-UI-32B | 75% | MobileUse-v2 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 73.3% | Mobile-Agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | MAI-UI-32B | 73.3% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | MAI-UI-8B | 70.7% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 69.7% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | JT-GUIAgent-V2 | 67.2% | JT-GUIAgent-V2 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 66.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | UI-Venus-Navi-72B | 65.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 62.9% | MobileUse | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | | 62.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | JT-GUIAgent-V1 | 60% | JT-GUIAgent-V1 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | V-Droid (Llama8B) | 59.5% | V-Droid Paper | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | Agent S2 | 54.3% | Agent S2 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Venus-Navi-7B | 49.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | MAI-UI-2B | 49.1% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | UI-TARS | 46.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | GPT-4o + Aria-UI | 44.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GPT-4o + UGround | 44% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | ScaleTrack-7B | 44% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 30.6% | AndroidWorld | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct | 27.6% | EcoAgent | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | | 27.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned) | 9.00% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 18 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
5 models have held number one since its release in May 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in May 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Sep 2026 | 87.1 | AndroidWorld | |
| 26 Aug 2026 | 84.5 | Mobile use AndroidWorld | |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 81.9 | Mobile use AndroidWorld | |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 85.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 81 | AndroidWorld | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | 70.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 66.4 | AndroidWorld | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 66.8 | AndroidWorld | |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 70.7 | AndroidWorld | |
| 8 Dec 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 57 | AndroidWorld |
| 7 Oct 2025 | 69.7 | AndroidWorld, measured by Google DeepMind | |
| 2 Sep 2025 | 73.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 57 | AndroidWorld |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 41.7 | AndroidWorld |
| 12 May 2025 | 62.1 | Android World | |
| 16 Apr 2025 | 64.2 | Android World | |
| 28 Jan 2025 | 35 | AndroidWorld_SR |
9 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Sep 2026 | | 87.1 | AndroidWorld (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 70.7 | AndroidWorld (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 57 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 62 | AndroidWorld (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 7 Oct 2025 | | 69.7 | Android World, Measured by Google DeepMind (results table, p.3) | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 57 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 41.7 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 62.1 | Android World, thinking (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 35 | AndroidWorld SR (Table 9) | Capabilities |
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%
- RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%