Vending-Bench 2
Agent runs a simulated vending-machine business for one year starting with $500. Score is the final bank balance, averaged over runs.
Paper covers the original Vending-Bench. The v2 environment is not released. Theoretical optimum is ~$63k, so headroom remains.
In the authors’ words
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can exhibit impressive proficiency in isolated, short-term tasks, they often fail to maintain coherent performance over longer time horizons. In this paper, we present Vending-Bench, a simulated environment designed to specifically test an LLM-based agent's ability to manage a straightforward, long-running business scenario: operating a vending machine. Agents must balance inventories, place orders, set prices, and handle daily fees - tasks that are each simple but collectively, over long horizons (>20M tokens per run) stress an LLM's capacity for sustained, coherent decision-making. Our experiments reveal high variance in performance across multiple LLMs: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and o3-mini manage the machine well in most runs and turn a profit, but all models have runs that derail, either through misinterpreting delivery schedules, forgetting orders, or descending into tangential "meltdown" loops from which they rarely recover. We find no clear correlation between failures and the point at which the model's context window becomes full, suggesting that these breakdowns do not stem from memory limits. Apart from highlighting the high variance in performance over long time horizons, Vending-Bench also tests models' ability to acquire capital, a necessity in many hypothetical dangerous AI scenarios. We hope the benchmark can help in preparing for the advent of stronger AI systems.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Gemini 4 Carbon leads with $16,484
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
- $16,484
Gemini 4 Carbon
- $15,515 GPT-6 Astra
- $14,428 GPT-6 Sol
- $13,718
Gemini 4 Argon
- $12,292
Muse Wonder Full
- $11,182 Claude Opus 5
- $11,165 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- $10,937 Claude Opus 4.7
- $10,537 Grok 4.7
- $9,619 GPT-5.6 Sol
- $9,432
Muse Wonder
- $9,235 Claude Opus 5.5
- $9,107 GPT-6.1 Terra
- $9,047 Grok 4.6
- $8,314 GLM-5.2
- $8,164 GLM-5.3
- $8,018 Claude Opus 4.6
- $7,524 GPT-5.5
- $7,343 GPT-5.6 Terra
- $7,204 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- $6,520
Muse Spark 1.1
- $6,378 Claude Sonnet 5
- $6,205 Kimi K2.6
- $6,144 GPT-5.4
- $5,940 GPT-5.3 Codex
- $5,787 Claude Opus 4.8
- $5,680 Claude Fable 5
- $5,634 GLM-5.1
- $5,478
Gemini 3 Pro
- $5,422 Claude Fable 5.1
- $5,396
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- $5,165 Kimi K3
- $5,115
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- $5,094
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- $5,083 Kimi K2.7 Code
- $4,967 Claude Opus 4.5
- $4,663 Grok 4.20
- $4,432 GLM-5
- $4,254
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
- $4,095 GPT-5.6 Luna
- $3,887 Grok 4.5
- $3,839 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- $3,774
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- $3,635
Gemini 3 Flash
- $3,602 Claude Haiku 5.5
- $3,591 GPT-5.2
- $3,285
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- $2,377 GLM-4.7
- $2,158
MiniMax-M3
- $1,473 GPT-5.1
- $1,198 Kimi K2.5
- $1,107 Grok 4.1 Fast
- $1,034
DeepSeek-V3.2
- $574
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- $549
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- $463
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- $459 Claude Haiku 4.5
- $202
Qwen3.5-27B
- $161
MiniMax-M2
- $72
Qwen3-Max
- $35 Grok 4.3
- $1
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)
- $-11
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- $-22 gpt-oss-120b
- $-23
MiniMax-M2.5
- $-31 GPT-5 mini
- 1
Gemini 4 Carbon $16,484
- 2 GPT-6 Astra $15,515
- 3 GPT-6 Sol $14,428
- 4
Gemini 4 Argon $13,718
- 5
Muse Wonder Full $12,292
- 6 Claude Opus 5 $11,182
- 7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 $11,165
- 8 Claude Opus 4.7 $10,937
- 9 Grok 4.7 $10,537
- 10 GPT-5.6 Sol $9,619
- 11
Muse Wonder $9,432
- 12 Claude Opus 5.5 $9,235
- 13 GPT-6.1 Terra $9,107
- 14 Grok 4.6 $9,047
- 15 GLM-5.2 $8,314
- 16 GLM-5.3 $8,164
- 17 Claude Opus 4.6 $8,018
- 18 GPT-5.5 $7,524
- 19 GPT-5.6 Terra $7,343
- 20 Claude Sonnet 4.6 $7,204
- 21
Muse Spark 1.1 $6,520
- 22 Claude Sonnet 5 $6,378
- 23 Kimi K2.6 $6,205
- 24 GPT-5.4 $6,144
- 25 GPT-5.3 Codex $5,940
- 26 Claude Opus 4.8 high $5,787
- 27 Claude Fable 5 high $5,680
- 28 GLM-5.1 $5,634
- 29
Gemini 3 Pro $5,478
- 30 Claude Fable 5.1 $5,422
- 31
Gemini 3.5 Flash $5,396
- 32 Kimi K3 via Moonshot $5,165
- 33
Qwen 3.6 Plus $5,115
- 34
Gemini 3.8 Flash $5,094
- 35 Kimi K2.7 Code $5,083
- 36 Claude Opus 4.5 $4,967
- 37 Grok 4.20 $4,663
- 38 GLM-5 $4,432
- 39
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) $4,254
- 40 GPT-5.6 Luna $4,095
- 41 Grok 4.5 $3,887
- 42 Claude Sonnet 4.5 $3,839
- 43
Gemini 3.1 Pro $3,774
- 44
Gemini 3 Flash $3,635
- 45 Claude Haiku 5.5 $3,602
- 46 GPT-5.2 $3,591
- 47
DeepSeek-V4-Pro $3,285
- 48 GLM-4.7 $2,377
- 49
MiniMax-M3 $2,158
- 50 GPT-5.1 $1,473
- 51 Kimi K2.5 $1,198
- 52 Grok 4.1 Fast $1,107
- 53
DeepSeek-V3.2 $1,034
- 54
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 $574
- 55
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 $549
- 56
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $463
- 57 Claude Haiku 4.5 $459
- 58
Qwen3.5-27B $202
- 59
MiniMax-M2 $161
- 60
Qwen3-Max $72
- 61 Grok 4.3 $35
- 62
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) $1
- 63
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 $-11
- 64 gpt-oss-120b $-22
- 65
MiniMax-M2.5 $-23
- 66 GPT-5 mini $-31
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | $16,484 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | $15,515 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-6 Sol | $14,428 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | $13,718 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | $12,292 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5 | $11,182 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $11,165 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.7 | $10,937 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Grok 4.7 | $10,537 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Sol | $9,619 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | $9,432 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Claude Opus 5.5 | $9,235 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-6.1 Terra | $9,107 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Grok 4.6 | $9,047 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | GLM-5.2 | $8,314 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GLM-5.3 | $8,164 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Opus 4.6 | $8,018 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-5.5 | $7,524 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | GPT-5.6 Terra | $7,343 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | $7,204 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | $6,520 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Claude Sonnet 5 | $6,378 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Kimi K2.6 | $6,205 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5.4 | $6,144 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-5.3 Codex | $5,940 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Claude Opus 4.8 | $5,787 | high | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | Claude Fable 5 | $5,680 | high | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | GLM-5.1 | $5,634 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | $5,478 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Claude Fable 5.1 | $5,422 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | $5,396 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Kimi K3 | $5,165 | via Moonshot | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | | $5,115 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | $5,094 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Kimi K2.7 Code | $5,083 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Claude Opus 4.5 | $4,967 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Grok 4.20 | $4,663 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GLM-5 | $4,432 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | $4,254 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | GPT-5.6 Luna | $4,095 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Grok 4.5 | $3,887 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | $3,839 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | $3,774 | custom tools | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 44 | | $3,635 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $3,602 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | GPT-5.2 | $3,591 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | $3,285 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GLM-4.7 | $2,377 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | $2,158 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | GPT-5.1 | $1,473 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | Kimi K2.5 | $1,198 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | Grok 4.1 Fast | $1,107 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | | $1,034 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | $574 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | $549 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | $463 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | $459 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | $202 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | $161 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | $72 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | Grok 4.3 | $35 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | $1 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | | $-11 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | gpt-oss-120b | $-22 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | $-23 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | GPT-5 mini | $-31 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Epoch AI has scores for 65 models. Labs report scores for 11 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
More effort adds a median 437 usd
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
7 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard, Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Oct 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026 | 16484 | Vending-Bench 2 (Bank balance $) | |
| 7 Apr 2026 | GLM-5.1 | 5634.4 | Vending Bench 2 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | GLM-5 | 4432.1 | Vending Bench 2 |
| 17 Dec 2025 | 3635 | Vending-Bench 2 (Net worth (mean)) | |
| 18 Nov 2025 | 5478.2 | Vending-Bench 2 (Net worth (mean)) |
7 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 5680.3 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance at high effort, Fable 5's best effort level (corrected from max effort in the June 11 changelog) (8.17.6) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 2992.3 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance at max effort ($5,787.43 at high effort), run by Andon Labs (8.13.5) | Capabilities |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 10937 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance at max effort. $7,971 at high effort (8.10.4) | Capabilities |
| 17 Feb 2026 | GLM-5 technical report | 4432 | Vending-Bench 2, final balance (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 17 Feb 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card | 7204.1 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance, max effort; $6,625.10 at high effort (2.13) | Capabilities |
| 5 Feb 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 system card | 8017.6 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance, effort high (2.15) | Capabilities |
| 24 Nov 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 system card | 4967.1 | Vending-Bench 2 final balance, effort high, 8,192 reasoning tokens per turn (2.11) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%