Vals Finance Agent v2
927 expert-reviewed research questions on public-company filings. Partial credit only after required checks pass. Private test split.
Rebuilt with 927 harder questions in nine workflow categories, scored with partial credit. Scores do not compare with v1.1.
In the authors’ words
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has emerged as a transformative force in financial analysis and the finance industry, though significant questions remain about the full capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in this domain. We present the Finance Agent Benchmark, featuring challenging and diverse real-world finance research problems that require LLMs to perform complex analysis using recent SEC filings. We construct the benchmark using a taxonomy of nine financial task categories, developed in consultation with experts from banks, hedge funds, and private equity firms. The dataset includes 537 expert-authored questions covering tasks from information retrieval to complex financial modeling, each validated through a rigorous review process to ensure accuracy and relevance. Moreover, we implement an agentic harness that equips LLMs with tools sufficient to produce accurate responses, including Google Search and EDGAR database access. Overall, the Finance Agent Benchmark provides a comprehensive testbed for measuring the progress of LLM-driven finance agents. Our evaluation reveals significant limitations in current AI capabilities - even the best-performing model (OpenAI o3) achieved only 46.8% accuracy at an average cost of $3.79 per query. This underscores the need for further advancements before reliable deployment in high-stakes finance settings.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Gemini 4 Argon leads with 65.4%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
- 65.4
Gemini 4 Argon
- 61.4
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 61.3
Muse Spark Open
- 60.6
Muse Spark 1.2
- 60.0
Muse Spark 1.3
- 59.1
Muse Wonder Full
- 59.0
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 58.9 Claude Fable 5.1
- 58.6 Claude Opus 5
- 58.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 58.1 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 57.9
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- 57.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 57.9 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 57.3 MiMo-V2.6 Pro
- 57.2
Muse Spark 1.1
- 57.0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 56.6
Muse Wonder
- 56.3 Claude Fable 5
- 56.3
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 56.3 MiMo-V2.6 Flash
- 55.8 GLM-5.3
- 55.1
Tencent Hy4 preview
- 55.0 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 54.9
Ling-3.0-flash-Fin
- 54.7
Mistral Large 4
- 54.4 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 54.1 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 53.9 Claude Opus 4.8
- 53.9 Claude Sonnet 5
- 53.8 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 53.7 Grok 4.6
- 53.5 GPT-6 Astra
- 53.5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 53.1 Kimi K3
- 52.3 Grok 4.7
- 52.0 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 51.9
Ember-1
- 51.8 GPT-5.5
- 51.5 Claude Opus 4.7
- 51.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 50.7
Step 5 Preview
- 50.6
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 50.4
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- 49.9 GPT-6 Luna
- 49.7 GLM-5.2
- 49.5
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- 49.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 48.5
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 48.4 Grok 4.5
- 48.3
MiniMax-M3
- 47.8
Qwen3.7-Max
- 47.4
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 46.6
Inkling
- 45.4 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 44.9 Kimi K2.6
- 44.8 GLM-5.1
- 44.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 43.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 42.5
Gemini 3 Flash
- 41.5 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 41.3
Inkling-Small
- 40.9
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 38.2 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 38.2
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 37.7 Grok 4.3
- 37.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 36.7 MiMo-V2.5
- 35.8 Kimi K2.5
- 32.1
Mistral Medium 3.5
- 31.0 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 30.3
Ling-3.0-flash
- 30.0
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 28.5 Grok 4.20
- 27.9
MiniMax-M2.7
- 25.0
Laguna M.1
- 18.9 Mercury 2.5
- 18.5
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
- 15.6
Laguna XS.2
- 9.04
Command A+
- 1
Gemini 4 Argon 65.4%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash 61.4%
- 3
Muse Spark Open 61.3%
- 4
Muse Spark 1.2 60.6%
- 5
Muse Spark 1.3 max 60%
- 6
Muse Wonder Full 59.1%
- 7
Gemini 3.7 Flash 59%
- 8 Claude Fable 5.1 58.9%
- 9 Claude Opus 5 58.6%
- 10 Claude Opus 5.5 58.6%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 5.5 58.1%
- 12
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 57.9%
- 13
Gemini 3.5 Flash 57.9%
- 14 GLM-5.3-Flash 57.9%
- 15 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 57.3%
- 16
Muse Spark 1.1 57.2%
- 17
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 57%
- 18
Muse Wonder 56.6%
- 19 Claude Fable 5 56.3%
- 20
Gemini 3.6 Flash 56.3%
- 21 MiMo-V2.6 Flash 56.3%
- 22 GLM-5.3 55.8%
- 23
Tencent Hy4 preview 55.1%
- 24 GPT-5.6 Luna 55%
- 25
Ling-3.0-flash-Fin 54.9%
- 26
Mistral Large 4 54.7%
- 27 GPT-5.6 Terra 54.4%
- 28 Claude Haiku 5.5 54.1%
- 29 Claude Opus 4.8 53.9%
- 30 Claude Sonnet 5 53.9%
- 31 GPT-5.6 Sol 53.8%
- 32 Grok 4.6 53.7%
- 33 GPT-6 Astra 53.5%
- 34
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 53.5%
- 35 Kimi K3 53.1%
- 36 Grok 4.7 52.3%
- 37 GPT-6.1 Sol 52%
- 38
Ember-1 51.9%
- 39 GPT-5.5 51.8%
- 40 Claude Opus 4.7 51.5%
- 41 Claude Sonnet 4.6 51%
- 42
Step 5 Preview 50.7%
- 43
Qwen 3.8 Max 50.6%
- 44
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 50.4%
- 45 GPT-6 Luna 49.9%
- 46 GLM-5.2 49.7%
- 47
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 49.5%
- 48 GPT-6 Sol 49%
- 49
Qwen 3.8 27B 48.5%
- 50 Grok 4.5 48.4%
- 51
MiniMax-M3 48.3%
- 52
Qwen3.7-Max 47.8%
- 53
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 47.4%
- 54
Inkling 46.6%
- 55 GPT-5.4 Mini 45.4%
- 56 Kimi K2.6 44.9%
- 57 GLM-5.1 44.8%
- 58
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 44.1%
- 59
Gemini 3.1 Pro 43%
- 60
Gemini 3 Flash 42.5%
- 61 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 41.5%
- 62
Inkling-Small 41.3%
- 63
Qwen 3.6 Plus 40.9%
- 64 GPT-5.4 Nano 38.2%
- 65
Qwen3.7-Plus 38.2%
- 66 Grok 4.3 37.7%
- 67
Nemotron 3 Ultra 37.7%
- 68 MiMo-V2.5 36.7%
- 69 Kimi K2.5 thinking 35.8%
- 70
Mistral Medium 3.5 32.1%
- 71 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 31%
- 72
Ling-3.0-flash 30.3%
- 73
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 30%
- 74 Grok 4.20 28.5%
- 75
MiniMax-M2.7 27.9%
- 76
Laguna M.1 25%
- 77 Mercury 2.5 18.9%
- 78
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 18.5%
- 79
Laguna XS.2 15.6%
- 80
Command A+ 9.04%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 65.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 61.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 61.3% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 60.6% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 60% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 59.1% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 59% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 58.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5 | 58.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 58.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 58.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 57.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 57.9% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 57.9% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 57.3% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 57.2% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 57% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 56.6% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude Fable 5 | 56.3% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 56.3% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | MiMo-V2.6 Flash | 56.3% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | GLM-5.3 | 55.8% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 55.1% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 55% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 54.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 54.7% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 54.4% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 54.1% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 53.9% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 53.9% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 53.8% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Grok 4.6 | 53.7% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | GPT-6 Astra | 53.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 53.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Kimi K3 | 53.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Grok 4.7 | 52.3% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 52% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 51.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GPT-5.5 | 51.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 51.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 51% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 50.7% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 50.6% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 50.4% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GPT-6 Luna | 49.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | GLM-5.2 | 49.7% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 49.5% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GPT-6 Sol | 49% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 48.5% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | Grok 4.5 | 48.4% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 48.3% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 47.8% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | | 47.4% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | 46.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 45.4% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | Kimi K2.6 | 44.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | GLM-5.1 | 44.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 44.1% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 43% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 42.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 41.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 41.3% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | | 40.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 38.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | 38.2% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | Grok 4.3 | 37.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | | 37.7% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 68 | MiMo-V2.5 | 36.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 69 | Kimi K2.5 | 35.8% | thinking | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 70 | | 32.1% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 71 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 31% | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 72 | | 30.3% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 73 | | 30% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 74 | Grok 4.20 | 28.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 75 | | 27.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 76 | | 25% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 77 | Mercury 2.5 | 18.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 78 | | 18.5% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 79 | | 15.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 80 | | 9.04% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 11 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
The best score, 65.4%, costs $4.38 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Muse Spark 1.2 comes within 4.8 points of the best for $0.77 a task, 6 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
6 models have held number one since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 57.9 | Finance Agent V2 | |
| 13 Oct 2026 | 65.4 | Vals Finance Agent v2 | |
| 12 Oct 2026 | 56.6 | Vals Finance Agent V2 | |
| 12 Oct 2026 | 59.1 | Vals Finance Agent V2 | |
| 6 Oct 2026 | 54.7 | Finance Agent: Vals.ai - Finance Agent V2 | |
| 2 Sep 2026 | 61.4 | Vals Finance Agent v2 | |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 54.4 | Finance Agent v2 |
| 9 Jul 2026 | 57.2 | Finance Agent v2 (Agentic financial anaysis) | |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 53.9 | Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2 |
| 19 May 2026 | 57.9 | Finance Agent v2 |
9 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | | 65.4 | Vals Finance Agent v2 (results table, p.5) | Capabilities |
| 12 Oct 2026 | | 56.6 | Vals Finance Agent V2, private test set accuracy from Vals AI, Muse Wonder (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) | Capabilities |
| 12 Oct 2026 | | 59.1 | Vals Finance Agent V2, private test set accuracy from Vals AI, Muse Wonder Full (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) | Capabilities |
| 2 Sep 2026 | | 61.4 | Vals Finance Agent v2 (results table, p.5) | Capabilities |
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 54.4 | Finance Agent v2, cited from Vals AI (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jul 2026 | | 57.2 | Finance Agent v2 (Figure 44) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 56.3 | Finance Agent Benchmark v2, run by Vals AI, adaptive thinking at max effort (8.17.2) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 53.9 | Finance Agent v2, run by Vals AI at max effort, 53.92% in text (Table 8.1.A, 8.13.2) | Capabilities |
| 19 May 2026 | | 57.9 | Finance Agent v2 (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%