Benchmark Almanac

UI-Vision Layout Grounding

Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 30.8% tops its leaderboard Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 24.3% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models identify interface layout regions. The score is the published intersection over union percentage.

One track of UI-Vision. The UI-Vision record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Finding things on screen
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
February 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Autonomous agents that navigate Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) to automate tasks like document editing and file management can greatly enhance computer workflows. While existing research focuses on online settings, desktop environments, critical for many professional and everyday tasks, remain underexplored due to data collection challenges and licensing issues. We introduce UI-Vision, the first comprehensive, license-permissive benchmark for offline, fine-grained evaluation of computer use agents in real-world desktop environments. Unlike online benchmarks, UI-Vision provides: (i) dense, high-quality annotations of human demonstrations, including bounding boxes, UI labels, and action trajectories (clicks, drags, and keyboard inputs) across 83 software applications, and (ii) three fine-to-coarse grained tasks-Element Grounding, Layout Grounding, and Action Prediction-with well-defined metrics to rigorously evaluate agents' performance in desktop environments. Our evaluation reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models like UI-TARS-72B, including issues with understanding professional software, spatial reasoning, and complex actions like drag-and-drop. These findings highlight the challenges in developing fully autonomous computer use agents. By releasing UI-Vision as open-source, we aim to advance the development of more capable agents for real-world desktop tasks.

Abstract of UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction (arXiv:2503.15661, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 30.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct, at 24.3%.

  1. 1 Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 30.8%
  2. 2 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 28.3%
  3. 3 OSAtlas-7B 28.2%
  4. 4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 24.3%
  5. 5 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 22.4%
  6. 6 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 20%
  7. 7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 17.6%
  8. 8 MiniCPM-V-8B 16.3%
  9. 9 CogAgent-9B 6.22%
  10. 10 SeeClick-9.6B 5.11%

Source: Official UI-Vision Layout Grounding leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 30.8% Official leaderboard
2 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 28.3% Official leaderboard
3 OSAtlas-7B 28.2% Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 24.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 22.4% Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 20% Official leaderboard
7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 17.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
8 MiniCPM-V-8B 16.3% Official leaderboard
9 CogAgent-9B 6.22% Official leaderboard
10 SeeClick-9.6B 5.11% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct

Source: Official UI-Vision Layout Grounding leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%