TheAgentCompany
Agents do work tasks in a simulated software company, using a browser, code, and chat with simulated coworkers. Scored by full and partial checkpoint completion.
In the authors’ words
We interact with computers on an everyday basis, be it in everyday life or work, and many aspects of work can be done entirely with access to a computer and the Internet. At the same time, thanks to improvements in large language models (LLMs), there has also been a rapid development in AI agents that interact with and affect change in their surrounding environments. But how performant are AI agents at accelerating or even autonomously performing work-related tasks? The answer to this question has important implications both for industry looking to adopt AI into their workflows and for economic policy to understand the effects that adoption of AI may have on the labor market. To measure the progress of these LLM agents' performance on performing real-world professional tasks, in this paper we introduce TheAgentCompany, an extensible benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker: by browsing the Web, writing code, running programs, and communicating with other coworkers. We build a self-contained environment with internal web sites and data that mimics a small software company environment, and create a variety of tasks that may be performed by workers in such a company. We test baseline agents powered by both closed API-based and open-weights language models (LMs), and find that the most competitive agent can complete 30% of tasks autonomously. This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with LM agents–in a setting simulating a real workplace, a good portion of simpler tasks could be solved autonomously, but more difficult long-horizon tasks are still beyond the reach of current systems. We release code, data, environment, and experiments on https://the-agent-company.com.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 42.9% among models released by Sep 2025
Best score per model in Epoch AI’s data. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 42.9%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 41.1%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 4 33.1%
- 4 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 30.9%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 30.3%
- 6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 24%
- 7
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 11.4%
- 8 GPT-4o Nov 2024 8.60%
- 9
Llama 3.1-405B 7.40%
- 10
Llama 3.1-70B 6.90%
- 11
Qwen2.5-72B 5.70%
- 12
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 3.40%
- 13
Amazon Nova Pro 1.70%
- 14
Qwen2-72B 1.10%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 42.9% | Sep 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 2 | | 41.1% | Sep 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 33.1% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 4 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 30.9% | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 5 | | 30.3% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 6 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 24% | Oct 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 7 | | 11.4% | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 8 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 8.60% | Nov 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 9 | | 7.40% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 10 | | 6.90% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 11 | | 5.70% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 12 | | 3.40% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 13 | | 1.70% | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 14 | | 1.10% | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
5 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No launch post has listed it since Oct 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2025 | 36 | AgentCompany |
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%