OSWorld-Verified
369 open-ended tasks in real desktop apps. Agent acts through screenshots, mouse and keyboard. Execution-based checkers score success.
Human baseline 72.4%. Top reported scores are ~83-86%, so near-saturated. Successor OSWorld 2.0 released 2026-06 (repo xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2).
In the authors’ words
Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Intelligence-Indeed Agent tops the leaderboard with 90.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Fable 5, at 86%.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 90.2 Intelligence-Indeed Agent
- 86.0 Claude Fable 5
- 83.6 Claude Opus 4.7
- 83.4 Claude Opus 5
- 82.8 Coasty CUA v1
- 81.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 80.7
Muse Spark 1.1
- 80.4 Holo3-35B-A3B
- 78.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 76.3 Claude Opus 4.5
- 75.2
MiniMax-M3
- 73.3
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 73.1 Kimi K2.6
- 72.6 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10)
- 69.9 GPT-5
- 64.2 GBOX Agent
- 63.3 Kimi K2.5
- 62.9 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 61.9 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro
- 61.9
Seed1.8
- 60.8 CoACT-1
- 58.0 aworldGUIAgent-v1
- 56.7 EvoCUA-20260105
- 56.0 o3
- 55.4 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B
- 53.9 DeepMiner-Mano-72B
- 53.1
UI-TARS-2
- 50.3 EvoCUA
- 48.0 autoglm-os-9b-20250925
- 47.3 autoglm-os-9b
- 46.1
EvoCUA-8B
- 45.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 45.0 opencua-72b-preview
- 43.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 41.8 UI-TARS-250705
- 41.6
Qwen3-VL-Flash
- 40.5 DART-GUI-7B-0924
- 40.1 DeepMiner-Mano-7B
- 40.0 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717
- 38.9
GUI-Owl-32B
- 35.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 34.8 OpenCUA-32B
- 33.8
Seed1.5-VL
- 32.1
GUI-Owl-7B
- 31.3 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
- 29.8 TianXi-Action-7B
- 29.3 GPT-4o
- 28.2 OpenCUA-7B
- 27.4
UI-TARS-1.5
- 27.1
UI-TARS-72B-DPO
- 23.1 opencua-qwen2-7b
- 19.9 opencua-a3b
- 10.3 kimi-vl-a3b
- 5.00
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 3.88
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 100 steps 90.2%
- 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
- 4 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
- 5 Coasty CUA v1 100 steps 82.8%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
- 7
Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
- 8 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
- 9
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
- 11
MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
- 12
Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
- 13 Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
- 14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 100 steps 72.6%
- 15 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
- 16 GBOX Agent 15 steps 64.2%
- 17 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
- 18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
- 19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 100 steps 61.9%
- 20
Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
- 21 CoACT-1 150 steps 60.8%
- 22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 50 steps 58%
- 23 EvoCUA-20260105 50 steps 56.7%
- 24 o3 100 steps 56%
- 25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 50 steps 55.4%
- 26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 100 steps 53.9%
- 27
UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
- 28 EvoCUA 50 steps 50.3%
- 29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 50 steps 48%
- 30 autoglm-os-9b 50 steps 47.3%
- 31
EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
- 32
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
- 33 opencua-72b-preview 100 steps 45%
- 34 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
- 35 UI-TARS-250705 100 steps 41.8%
- 36
Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
- 37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 30 steps 40.5%
- 38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 100 steps 40.1%
- 39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 100 steps 40%
- 40
GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
- 41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
- 42 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
- 43
Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
- 44
GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
- 45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
- 46 TianXi-Action-7B 50 steps 29.8%
- 47 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
- 48 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
- 49
UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
- 50
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
- 51 opencua-qwen2-7b 100 steps 23.1%
- 52 opencua-a3b 50 steps 19.9%
- 53 kimi-vl-a3b 100 steps 10.3%
- 54
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
- 55
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intelligence-Indeed Agent | 90.2% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 86% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 83.6% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5 | 83.4% | 1M context, 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Coasty CUA v1 | 82.8% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 81.5% | 100 steps, Pointer Agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 80.7% | 100 steps | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Holo3-35B-A3B | 80.4% | 100 steps | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 78.3% | 100 steps, OpenAPA | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 76.3% | 100 steps, VLAA-GUI | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 75.2% | 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 73.3% | 100 steps | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Kimi K2.6 | 73.1% | 100 steps | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) | 72.6% | 100 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5 | 69.9% | 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GBOX Agent | 64.2% | 15 steps | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Kimi K2.5 | 63.3% | 100 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 62.9% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Agentic-Lybic-Maestro | 61.9% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 61.9% | 100 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | CoACT-1 | 60.8% | 150 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | aworldGUIAgent-v1 | 58% | 50 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | EvoCUA-20260105 | 56.7% | 50 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | o3 | 56% | 100 steps, agent s2.5 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | GUI-Owl-1.5 32B | 55.4% | 50 steps | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | DeepMiner-Mano-72B | 53.9% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 53.1% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | EvoCUA | 50.3% | 50 steps | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | autoglm-os-9b-20250925 | 48% | 50 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | autoglm-os-9b | 47.3% | 50 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 46.1% | 50 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | | 45.8% | 50 steps, agent s2 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | opencua-72b-preview | 45% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 43.9% | 50 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | UI-TARS-250705 | 41.8% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | | 41.6% | 100 steps | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | DART-GUI-7B-0924 | 40.5% | 30 steps | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | DeepMiner-Mano-7B | 40.1% | 100 steps | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 | 40% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | | 38.9% | 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.8% | 50 steps | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | OpenCUA-32B | 34.8% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 33.8% | 100 steps | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 44 | | 32.1% | 15 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 45 | computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 31.3% | 50 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | TianXi-Action-7B | 29.8% | 50 steps | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 29.3% | 100 steps, Jedi-7B | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 48 | OpenCUA-7B | 28.2% | 50 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | | 27.4% | 100 steps | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | | 27.1% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 51 | opencua-qwen2-7b | 23.1% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | opencua-a3b | 19.9% | 50 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 53 | kimi-vl-a3b | 10.3% | 100 steps | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 54 | | 5.00% | 100 steps | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 55 | | 3.88% | 100 steps | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 37 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | 1M context, 100 steps | 86% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 100 steps | Pointer Agent | 83.6% | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | 1M context, 100 steps | 83.4% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 100 steps | Pointer Agent | 81.5% | ||
| | 100 steps | 80.7% | |||
| Holo3-35B-A3B | 100 steps | 80.4% | |||
| | 100 steps | OpenAPA | 78.3% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | VLAA-GUI | 76.3% | ||
| | 100 steps | 75.2% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | HIPPO Agent | 74.5% | ||
| | 100 steps | 73.3% | |||
| Kimi K2.6 | 100 steps | 73.1% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 100 steps | 72.1% | |||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=10) | 69.9% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 67.1% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=1) | 66% | ||
| GPT-5 | 50 steps | OS-Symphony | 65.8% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 50 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 64.4% | ||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | GTA1 | 63.4% | ||
| Kimi K2.5 | 100 steps | 63.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 100 steps | 62.9% | |||
| GPT-5 | 100 steps | agent s3 bBoN (N=1) | 62.6% | ||
| | 100 steps | 61.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 50 steps | 58.1% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | agent s2.5 | 56% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | agent s2.5 | 54.2% | ||
| GPT-5 | 50 steps | UiPath Screen Agent | 53.6% | ||
| o3 | 100 steps | GTA1 | 53.1% | ||
| | 100 steps | 53.1% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | Jedi-7B | 51% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | Jedi-7B | 50.6% | ||
| o3 | 50 steps | GTA1 | 48.6% | ||
| | 50 steps | 46.1% | |||
| | 50 steps | agent s2 | 45.8% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 50 steps | 43.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 15 steps | 42.9% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | Jedi-7B | 42.4% | ||
| | 100 steps | 41.6% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 100 steps | 41.4% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | agent s2.5 | 39% | ||
| | 50 steps | mobile-agent-v3 | 38.9% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 50 steps | 35.8% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 100 steps | 35.6% | |||
| OpenCUA-32B | 100 steps | 34.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | agent s2 | 34.6% | ||
| OpenCUA-32B | 50 steps | 34.1% | |||
| | 100 steps | 33.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | 32.1% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 50 steps | 31.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 15 steps | 31.2% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 100 steps | 30.5% | |||
| OpenCUA-32B | 15 steps | 29.7% | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 100 steps | Jedi-7B | 29.3% | ||
| OpenCUA-7B | 50 steps | 28.2% | |||
| | 15 steps | 27.8% | |||
| | 100 steps | 27.4% | |||
| | 50 steps | 27.3% | |||
| | 100 steps | 27.1% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 15 steps | 27.1% | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 50 steps | Jedi-7B | 27% | ||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 15 steps | Jedi-7B | 26.8% | ||
| OpenCUA-7B | 100 steps | 26.6% | |||
| computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 15 steps | 26% | |||
| | 50 steps | 25.8% | |||
| | 15 steps | 24.5% | |||
| OpenCUA-7B | 15 steps | 24.3% | |||
| | 15 steps | 24% | |||
| o3 | 100 steps | 23% | |||
| o3 | 50 steps | 17.2% | |||
| o3 | 15 steps | 9.10% | |||
| | 100 steps | 5.00% | |||
| | 15 steps | 4.43% | |||
| | 100 steps | 3.88% | |||
| | 15 steps | 3.04% |
6 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Jun 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
9 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026 | 66 | OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks excluding Google Drive, 50 steps, two-run average | |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 80.4 | OSWorld Verified | |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 51.1 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 22 Sep 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 82 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 84.3 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified | |
| 10 Aug 2026 | 65.9 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 86.1 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 21 Jul 2026 | 74 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 21 Jul 2026 | 83 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 84.8 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 9 Jul 2026 | 80.8 | OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use) | |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 81.2 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 | 85 | Computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 73.3 | OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False) | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 75.2 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 83.4 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| 19 May 2026 | 78.4 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 47.4 | OSWorld | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 64.4 | OSWorld-Verfied | |
| 23 Apr 2026 | GPT-5.5 | 78.7 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 20 Apr 2026 | Kimi K2.6 | 73.1 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 78 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| 7 Apr 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview | 79.6 | OSWorld |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 62.5 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 17 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 39 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 17 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 72.1 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 5 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 75 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 58 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 17 Feb 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 72.5 | Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 62.2 | OSWorld-Verified | |
| 5 Feb 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 72.7 | Agentic computer use OSWorld |
| 5 Feb 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 64.7 | OSWorld-Verified |
| 24 Nov 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 66.3 | Computer use OSWorld |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 50.7 | Computer use OSWorld |
| 29 Sep 2025 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 61.4 | Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps) |
| 22 Oct 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 22 | OSWorld (screenshot only, 50 steps) Overall |
19 system cards report it, from 7 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026 | | 66 | OSWorld-Verified Overall, 50 steps, OS 87.5, Office 64.9, Daily 65.0, Professional 66.3, Workflow 62.7 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 19 Oct 2026 | | 65.9 | OSWorld-Verified, high, 69.7 xhigh (Tables 2 and 5) | Capabilities |
| 15 Oct 2026 | | 52.1 | OSWorld (OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks without Google Drive, screenshots only, 100 steps) (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report | 82 | OSWorld-Verified (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 84.8 | OSWorld-Verified (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 21 Jul 2026 | | 83 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| 21 Jul 2026 | | 74 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jul 2026 | | 80.8 | OSWorld-Verified, mean per-task reward, 361 tasks (Figure 44) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 81.2 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate averaged over five runs, max effort, 100 steps (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.2) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 85 | OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks, 100 steps, pass@1 averaged over five runs, max effort, after the zoom-tool fix and 128K per-turn tokens (Table 8.1.A) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 83.4 | OSWorld-Verified first-attempt success rate, 361 tasks, 100 steps, max effort, five runs, zoom tool fix and 128K tokens per turn (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.6) | Capabilities |
| 19 May 2026 | | 78.4 | OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| 27 Apr 2026 | | 47.4 | OSWorld, reasoning on, version not stated, mapped to OSWorld-Verified as in the launch record (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 78 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 8.1.A, 8.9.4) | Capabilities |
| 7 Apr 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview system card | 79.6 | OSWorld (named OSWorld in the card), first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 6.3.A, 6.11.4) | Capabilities |
| 17 Feb 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card | 72.5 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 2.1.A, 2.6) | Capabilities |
| 5 Feb 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 system card | 72.7 | OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 2.3.A, 2.8) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 63.3 | OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 24 Nov 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 system card | 66.3 | OSWorld, P@1 avg@5, 1080p, 100 steps, 64k thinking (Table 2.3.A; 66.26% in 2.9) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%
- RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%