Benchmark Almanac

OSWorld-Verified

Intelligence-Indeed Agent 90.2% tops its leaderboard Claude Fable 5 86% leads the models we track In use

369 open-ended tasks in real desktop apps. Agent acts through screenshots, mouse and keyboard. Execution-based checkers score success.

Human baseline 72.4%. Top reported scores are ~83-86%, so near-saturated. Successor OSWorld 2.0 released 2026-06 (repo xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2).

In the authors’ words

Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.

Abstract of OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments (arXiv:2404.07972, CC0)
Made by XLANG Lab (HKU) + collaborators Released Jul 2025 Desktop apps All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
55
Entries on its own leaderboard, 33 models we track
36
Launch posts list it, from 11 labs
19
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Intelligence-Indeed Agent tops the leaderboard with 90.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Fable 5, at 86%.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 100 steps 90.2%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps 83.6%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
  5. 5 Coasty CUA v1 100 steps 82.8%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 81.5%
  7. 7 Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
  8. 8 Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps 78.3%
  10. 10 Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps 76.3%
  11. 11 MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
  12. 12 Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
  13. 13 Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
  14. 14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 100 steps 72.6%
  15. 15 GPT-5 100 steps 69.9%
  16. 16 GBOX Agent 15 steps 64.2%
  17. 17 Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
  18. 18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
  19. 19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 100 steps 61.9%
  20. 20 Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
  21. 21 CoACT-1 150 steps 60.8%
  22. 22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 50 steps 58%
  23. 23 EvoCUA-20260105 50 steps 56.7%
  24. 24 o3 100 steps 56%
  25. 25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 50 steps 55.4%
  26. 26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 100 steps 53.9%
  27. 27 UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
  28. 28 EvoCUA 50 steps 50.3%
  29. 29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 50 steps 48%
  30. 30 autoglm-os-9b 50 steps 47.3%
  31. 31 EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
  32. 32 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, 50 steps 45.8%
  33. 33 opencua-72b-preview 100 steps 45%
  34. 34 Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
  35. 35 UI-TARS-250705 100 steps 41.8%
  36. 36 Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
  37. 37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 30 steps 40.5%
  38. 38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 100 steps 40.1%
  39. 39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 100 steps 40%
  40. 40 GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps 38.9%
  41. 41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
  42. 42 OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
  43. 43 Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
  44. 44 GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
  45. 45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
  46. 46 TianXi-Action-7B 50 steps 29.8%
  47. 47 GPT-4o Mar 2025, 100 steps 29.3%
  48. 48 OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
  49. 49 UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
  50. 50 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
  51. 51 opencua-qwen2-7b 100 steps 23.1%
  52. 52 opencua-a3b 50 steps 19.9%
  53. 53 kimi-vl-a3b 100 steps 10.3%
  54. 54 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
  55. 55 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intelligence-Indeed Agent 90.2% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 86% 1M context, 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.7 83.6% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 5 83.4% 1M context, 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Coasty CUA v1 82.8% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.5% 100 steps, Pointer Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Muse Spark 1.1 80.7% 100 steps Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Holo3-35B-A3B 80.4% 100 steps Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 78.3% 100 steps, OpenAPA Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 4.5 76.3% 100 steps, VLAA-GUI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 MiniMax-M3 75.2% 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3% 100 steps Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2.6 73.1% 100 steps Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
14 agent s3 w/ Opus 4.5 + GPT-5 bBoN (N=10) 72.6% 100 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5 69.9% 100 steps, agent s3 bBoN (N=10) Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 GBOX Agent 64.2% 15 steps Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Kimi K2.5 63.3% 100 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 62.9% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Agentic-Lybic-Maestro 61.9% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Seed1.8 61.9% 100 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
21 CoACT-1 60.8% 150 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 aworldGUIAgent-v1 58% 50 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
23 EvoCUA-20260105 56.7% 50 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
24 o3 56% 100 steps, agent s2.5 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 GUI-Owl-1.5 32B 55.4% 50 steps Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
26 DeepMiner-Mano-72B 53.9% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
27 UI-TARS-2 53.1% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
28 EvoCUA 50.3% 50 steps Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
29 autoglm-os-9b-20250925 48% 50 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
30 autoglm-os-9b 47.3% 50 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
31 EvoCUA-8B 46.1% 50 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 45.8% 50 steps, agent s2 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
33 opencua-72b-preview 45% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Claude Sonnet 4 43.9% 50 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
35 UI-TARS-250705 41.8% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Qwen3-VL-Flash 41.6% 100 steps Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
37 DART-GUI-7B-0924 40.5% 30 steps Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
38 DeepMiner-Mano-7B 40.1% 100 steps Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
39 doubao-1-5-thinking-vision-pro-250717 40% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
40 GUI-Owl-32B 38.9% 50 steps, mobile-agent-v3 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
41 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.8% 50 steps Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
42 OpenCUA-32B 34.8% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
43 Seed1.5-VL 33.8% 100 steps May 2025 Official leaderboard
44 GUI-Owl-7B 32.1% 15 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
45 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 31.3% 50 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
46 TianXi-Action-7B 29.8% 50 steps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
47 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.3% 100 steps, Jedi-7B Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
48 OpenCUA-7B 28.2% 50 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
49 UI-TARS-1.5 27.4% 100 steps Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
50 UI-TARS-72B-DPO 27.1% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
51 opencua-qwen2-7b 23.1% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
52 opencua-a3b 19.9% 50 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
53 kimi-vl-a3b 10.3% 100 steps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
54 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 5.00% 100 steps Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
55 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 3.88% 100 steps Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 37 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Claude Opus 4.5 UiPath Screen Agent
50 steps
67.1%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
15 steps 50 steps 100 steps
62.9%
o3 agent s2.5
15 steps 50 steps
56%
o3 GTA1
50 steps 100 steps
53.1%
o3 Jedi-7B
15 steps 50 steps
51%
Gemini 2.5 Pro agent s2
15 steps 50 steps
45.8%
Claude Sonnet 4
15 steps 100 steps
43.9%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
15 steps 100 steps
35.8%
OpenCUA-32B
15 steps 50 steps
34.8%
Seed1.5-VL
15 steps 100 steps
33.8%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
15 steps 100 steps
31.3%
GPT-4o Jedi-7B
15 steps
29.3%
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Claude Fable 5 1M context, 100 steps 86%
Claude Opus 4.7 100 steps Pointer Agent 83.6%
Claude Opus 5 1M context, 100 steps 83.4%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps Pointer Agent 81.5%
Muse Spark 1.1 100 steps 80.7%
Holo3-35B-A3B 100 steps 80.4%
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100 steps OpenAPA 78.3%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps VLAA-GUI 76.3%
MiniMax-M3 100 steps 75.2%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps HIPPO Agent 74.5%
Qwen3.7-Plus 100 steps 73.3%
Kimi K2.6 100 steps 73.1%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 100 steps 72.1%
GPT-5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=10) 69.9%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps UiPath Screen Agent 67.1%
Claude Opus 4.5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=1) 66%
GPT-5 50 steps OS-Symphony 65.8%
Claude Opus 4.5 50 steps UiPath Screen Agent 64.4%
GPT-5 100 steps GTA1 63.4%
Kimi K2.5 100 steps 63.3%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 100 steps 62.9%
GPT-5 100 steps agent s3 bBoN (N=1) 62.6%
Seed1.8 100 steps 61.9%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 50 steps 58.1%
o3 100 steps agent s2.5 56%
o3 50 steps agent s2.5 54.2%
GPT-5 50 steps UiPath Screen Agent 53.6%
o3 100 steps GTA1 53.1%
UI-TARS-2 100 steps 53.1%
o3 100 steps Jedi-7B 51%
o3 50 steps Jedi-7B 50.6%
o3 50 steps GTA1 48.6%
EvoCUA-8B 50 steps 46.1%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 50 steps agent s2 45.8%
Claude Sonnet 4 50 steps 43.9%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 15 steps 42.9%
o3 15 steps Jedi-7B 42.4%
Qwen3-VL-Flash 100 steps 41.6%
Claude Sonnet 4 100 steps 41.4%
o3 15 steps agent s2.5 39%
GUI-Owl-32B 50 steps mobile-agent-v3 38.9%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 50 steps 35.8%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 100 steps 35.6%
OpenCUA-32B 100 steps 34.8%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 15 steps agent s2 34.6%
OpenCUA-32B 50 steps 34.1%
Seed1.5-VL 100 steps 33.8%
GUI-Owl-7B 15 steps 32.1%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 50 steps 31.3%
Claude Sonnet 4 15 steps 31.2%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 100 steps 30.5%
OpenCUA-32B 15 steps 29.7%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 100 steps Jedi-7B 29.3%
OpenCUA-7B 50 steps 28.2%
Seed1.5-VL 15 steps 27.8%
UI-TARS-1.5 100 steps 27.4%
UI-TARS-1.5 50 steps 27.3%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 100 steps 27.1%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 15 steps 27.1%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 50 steps Jedi-7B 27%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 15 steps Jedi-7B 26.8%
OpenCUA-7B 100 steps 26.6%
computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 15 steps 26%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 50 steps 25.8%
UI-TARS-1.5 15 steps 24.5%
OpenCUA-7B 15 steps 24.3%
UI-TARS-72B-DPO 15 steps 24%
o3 100 steps 23%
o3 50 steps 17.2%
o3 15 steps 9.10%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 100 steps 5.00%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 15 steps 4.43%
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 100 steps 3.88%
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 15 steps 3.04%

6 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Anthropic Qwen
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1%

The best score passed 85% in Jun 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5 o3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet UI-TARS-72B-DPO 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.5

9 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
OpenAI
Qwen
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
NVIDIA
Google DeepMind
MiniMax
Meta
Xiaomi Corp
Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
30 Oct 2026 Mage-VL-Cowork 66 OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks excluding Google Drive, 50 steps, two-run average
15 Oct 2026 Muse Spark Open 80.4 OSWorld Verified
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 51.1 OSWorld-Verified
22 Sep 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 82 OSWorld-Verified
14 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 84.3 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
10 Aug 2026 Muse Glimmer 65.9 OSWorld-Verified
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1 OSWorld-Verified
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 74 OSWorld-Verified
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash 83 OSWorld-Verified
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 84.8 OSWorld-Verified
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 80.8 OSWorld-Verified (Agentic computer use)
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 81.2 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 85 Computer use OSWorld-Verified
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 73.3 OSWorld-Verified (enable_thinking=False)
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 75.2 OSWorld-Verified
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 83.4 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
19 May 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash 78.4 OSWorld-Verified
28 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 47.4 OSWorld
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 64.4 OSWorld-Verfied
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 78.7 OSWorld-Verified
20 Apr 2026 Kimi K2.6 73.1 OSWorld-Verified
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 78 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
7 Apr 2026 Claude Mythos Preview 79.6 OSWorld
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62.5 OSWorld-Verified
17 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 Nano 39 OSWorld-Verified
17 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 Mini 72.1 OSWorld-Verified
5 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 75 OSWorld-Verified
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58 OSWorld-Verified
17 Feb 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 72.5 Agentic computer use OSWorld-Verified
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 62.2 OSWorld-Verified
5 Feb 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 72.7 Agentic computer use OSWorld
5 Feb 2026 GPT-5.3 Codex 64.7 OSWorld-Verified
24 Nov 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 66.3 Computer use OSWorld
15 Oct 2025 Claude Haiku 4.5 50.7 Computer use OSWorld
29 Sep 2025 Claude Sonnet 4.5 61.4 Computer use OSWorld (official OSWorld-Verified framework, 100 max steps)
22 Oct 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 22 OSWorld (screenshot only, 50 steps) Overall

19 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Oct 2026 Mage-VL-Cowork technical report 66 OSWorld-Verified Overall, 50 steps, OS 87.5, Office 64.9, Daily 65.0, Professional 66.3, Workflow 62.7 (Table 2) Capabilities
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 65.9 OSWorld-Verified, high, 69.7 xhigh (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 52.1 OSWorld (OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks without Google Drive, screenshots only, 100 steps) (Table 10) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report 82 OSWorld-Verified (Table 3) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 84.8 OSWorld-Verified (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash model card 83 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model card 74 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 80.8 OSWorld-Verified, mean per-task reward, 361 tasks (Figure 44) Capabilities
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 81.2 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate averaged over five runs, max effort, 100 steps (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.2) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 85 OSWorld-Verified, 361 tasks, 100 steps, pass@1 averaged over five runs, max effort, after the zoom-tool fix and 128K per-turn tokens (Table 8.1.A) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 83.4 OSWorld-Verified first-attempt success rate, 361 tasks, 100 steps, max effort, five runs, zoom tool fix and 128K tokens per turn (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.6) Capabilities
19 May 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash model card 78.4 OSWorld-Verified (results table, p.4) Capabilities
27 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 47.4 OSWorld, reasoning on, version not stated, mapped to OSWorld-Verified as in the launch record (Table 7) Capabilities
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 78 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 8.1.A, 8.9.4) Capabilities
7 Apr 2026 Claude Mythos Preview system card 79.6 OSWorld (named OSWorld in the card), first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 6.3.A, 6.11.4) Capabilities
17 Feb 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card 72.5 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs (Table 2.1.A, 2.6) Capabilities
5 Feb 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 system card 72.7 OSWorld-Verified, first-attempt success rate, average of five runs, 1080p, 100 steps (Table 2.3.A, 2.8) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 63.3 OSWorld-Verified, GUI actions only (Table 4) Capabilities
24 Nov 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 system card 66.3 OSWorld, P@1 avg@5, 1080p, 100 steps, 64k thinking (Table 2.3.A; 66.26% in 2.9) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Qwen Anthropic OpenAI ByteDance Seed
OSWorld 2.1 25 leaders
OSWorld Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 78.8%
OSWorld-Verified Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
Qwen 3.8 Max 86.1%
OSWorld 2.0 4 leaders
OSWorld 2.0 (Aug 2026) Replaced by 2.1, Sep 2026
OSWorld 2.1 2 leaders

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%
  • RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%