OmniDocBench
Diverse PDF pages with layout, text, table and formula annotations. Parsing scored by edit distance and TEDS.
The first release has 981 pages and reports edit distance, where lower is better. The repo main branch moved to v1.5 in 2025-09 and v1.6 in 2026-04, and v1.0 lives on branch v1_0.
In the authors’ words
Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
MiMo-V2.5 leads with 87.2% among models released by Jul 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 15 more
- 1 MiMo-V2.5 87.2%
- 2 Kimi K3 91.1%
- 3
MiniMax-M3 91.6%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MiMo-V2.5 | 87.2% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K3 | 91.1% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 91.6% | Jun 2026 | Model card |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 91.1 | OmniDocBench |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 91.6 | OmniDocBench | |
| 5 May 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 0.125 | OmniDocBench (Document Parsing), plotted 12.5, version not stated |
| 22 Apr 2026 | MiMo-V2.5 | 87.2 | OmniDocBench |
| 5 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 0.109 | OmniDocBench (normalized edit distance, lower is better), reasoning none |
| 31 Oct 2025 | 22.8 | OmniDocBench EN/ZH (lower is better) 22.8 / 29.0 |
5 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 91.1 | OmniDocBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 21.5 | OmniDocBench NED, lower is better, version not stated, SeRe (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.155, zh 0.207, lower is better, no overall (Table 2) | Capabilities | |
| 31 Oct 2025 | | 22.8 | OmniDocBench EN, lower is better (Table 5). ZH 29.0 | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.226, zh 0.324, lower is better, no overall (Table 5) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%