Benchmark Almanac

OmniDocBench

MiMo-V2.5 87.2% leads since Apr 2026 In use

Diverse PDF pages with layout, text, table and formula annotations. Parsing scored by edit distance and TEDS.

The first release has 981 pages and reports edit distance, where lower is better. The repo main branch moved to v1.5 in 2025-09 and v1.6 in 2026-04, and v1.0 lives on branch v1_0.

In the authors’ words

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Abstract of OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations (arXiv:2412.07626, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Lab (OpenDataLab) Released Dec 2024 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a launch post Jul 2026 Last model added Jul 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
3
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
5
System cards report it, from 4 labs

MiMo-V2.5 leads with 87.2% among models released by Jul 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MiMo-V2.5 87.2%
  2. 2 Kimi K3 91.1%
  3. 3 MiniMax-M3 91.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiMo-V2.5 87.2% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Kimi K3 91.1% Jul 2026 Model card
3 MiniMax-M3 91.6% Jun 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Xiaomi Corp
Lab claims Not tested since Jul 2026
MiMo-V2.5 87.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 MiMo-V2.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 MiMo-V2.5

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meituan
OpenAI
Xiaomi Corp
MiniMax
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 91.1 OmniDocBench
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 91.6 OmniDocBench
5 May 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant 0.125 OmniDocBench (Document Parsing), plotted 12.5, version not stated
22 Apr 2026 MiMo-V2.5 87.2 OmniDocBench
5 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 0.109 OmniDocBench (normalized edit distance, lower is better), reasoning none
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 22.8 OmniDocBench EN/ZH (lower is better) 22.8 / 29.0

5 system cards report it, from 4 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 91.1 OmniDocBench (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 21.5 OmniDocBench NED, lower is better, version not stated, SeRe (Table 1) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.155, zh 0.207, lower is better, no overall (Table 2) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 22.8 OmniDocBench EN, lower is better (Table 5). ZH 29.0 Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.226, zh 0.324, lower is better, no overall (Table 5) Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%