Benchmark Almanac

OmniDocBench v1.5

GLM-OCR 94.6 leads since Mar 2026 In use

Models parse 1,355 PDF pages into text, tables and formulas. The Overall score averages text accuracy from edit distance, table TEDS and formula CDM.

Adds 374 pages to v1.0, raises newspaper and note scans to 200 DPI, and drops the Chinese and English split. Higher Overall is better, unlike the v1.0 edit distance.

In the authors’ words

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Abstract of OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations (arXiv:2412.07626, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Lab (OpenDataLab) Released Sep 2025 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
13
Models scored in lab cards
20
Launch posts list it, from 9 labs
10
System cards report it, from 8 labs

GLM-OCR leads with 94.6

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 GLM-OCR 94.6
  2. 2 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7
  3. 3 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2
  4. 4 Muse Glimmer 75.8
  5. 5 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 0.42
  6. 6 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 0.32
  7. 7 GPT-5.4 Nano 0.24
  8. 8 Gemma 4 26B A4B 0.15
  9. 9 Gemma 4 31B IT 0.13
  10. 10 Gemini 3 Flash 0.12
  11. 11 Gemini 3 Pro 0.12
  12. 12 Seed1.8 0.11
  13. 13 Seed2.0 Pro 0.10
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GLM-OCR 94.6 Mar 2026 Model card
2 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7 Jun 2026 Model card
3 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2 Apr 2026 Model card
4 Muse Glimmer 75.8 Oct 2026 Model card
5 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 0.42 Oct 2026 Model card
6 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 0.32 Jun 2026 Model card
7 GPT-5.4 Nano 0.24 Mar 2026 Model card
8 Gemma 4 26B A4B 0.15 Apr 2026 Model card
9 Gemma 4 31B IT 0.13 Apr 2026 Model card
10 Gemini 3 Flash 0.12 Dec 2025 Model card
11 Gemini 3 Pro 0.12 Nov 2025 Model card
12 Seed1.8 0.11 Dec 2025 Model card
13 Seed2.0 Pro 0.10 Feb 2026 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 40 entries, 10 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

5 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Qwen Z.ai
Own leaderboard Replaced by 1.6, Apr 2026
GLM-OCR 94.3
Lab claims 3 leaders
GLM-OCR 94.6

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2025 2026 2027 0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2025 2026 2027

3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
Z.ai
Qwen
OpenAI
LG AI Research
Kuaishou
Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
14 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 91.1 Document intelligence OmniDocBench 1.5
10 Aug 2026 Muse Glimmer 75.8 OmniDocBench v1.5
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 92.1 OmniDocBench 1.5
10 Jun 2026 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 0.319 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 91.4 OmniDocBench1.5
25 May 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7 OmniDocBench1.5
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 89.9 OmniDocBench1.5
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2 OmniDocBench v1.5
2 Apr 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B 0.149 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 91.2 OmniDocBench1.5
2 Apr 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT 0.131 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
17 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 Nano 0.242 OmniDocBench 1.5 (no tools), lower is better
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 89.8 OmniDocBench1.5
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 90.8 OmniDocBench1.5
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 0.099 OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better)
30 Jan 2026 GLM-OCR 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 88.8 OmniDocBench 1.5
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 0.106 OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better)
17 Dec 2025 Gemini 3 Flash 0.121 OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better)
18 Nov 2025 Gemini 3 Pro 0.115 OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better)

10 system cards report it, from 8 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 0.42 OmniDocBench 1.5 edit distance, lower is better, reasoning, 0.47 non-reasoning (Table 8) Capabilities
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 75.8 OmniDocBench v1.5, high (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT technical report 0.131 OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B technical report 0.149 OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 84.7 OmniDocBench1.5 overall (Figure 5, printed value) Capabilities
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 81.2 OmniDocBench v1.5 (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 0.106 OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 2) Capabilities
11 Mar 2026 GLM-OCR technical report 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall (Tables 3 and 4). Text Edit 0.040, Formula CDM 93.90, Table TEDS 93.96, TEDS-S 96.39, Reading Order Edit 0.044 Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 0.099 OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 8) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 88.8 OmniDocBench 1.5, (1 minus normalized edit distance) x 100 (Table 4) Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%