OmniDocBench v1.6
Models parse 1,651 PDF pages, including nested tables, dense formulas and unusual layouts, into text, tables and formulas. Scored by the v1.5 Overall formula.
Adds 296 harder pages and a new matching method, MGAM, on the prediction side. v1.7 on 2026-04-30 added skills-based evaluation without new pages, so it stays in this record.
In the authors’ words
Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
OXR-1.0 tops the leaderboard with 97.0
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GLM-OCR, at 95.2.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jan 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 97.0 OXR-1.0
- 96.9 TeleOCR
- 96.5 OvisOCR2
- 96.3 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6
- 95.8 MinerU2.5-Pro
- 95.2 GLM-OCR
- 94.9 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5
- 94.2 PaddleOCR-VL
- 94.0 Unlimited-OCR
- 93.9 Qianfan-OCR
- 93.7 Youtu-Parsing
- 93.7 Ovis2.6-30B-A3B
- 93.3 Logics-Parsing-v2
- 93.3 ABot-OCR
- 93.3 FireRed-OCR
- 93.0 MinerU-2.5
- 92.9
Gemini 3 Pro
- 92.6
Gemini 3 Flash
- 91.8 MonkeyOCR V2
- 90.8 dots.ocr
- 90.7 OpenDoc-0.1B
- 90.3 DeepSeek-OCR 2
- 90.0 HunyuanOCR
- 89.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 89.5 Dolphin-v2
- 88.6 OCRVerse
- 88.6 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B
- 86.6 GPT-5.2
- 86.5 Dolphin-1.5
- 86.5 MinerU-Pipeline
- 85.7 olmOCR
- 85.7 Mistral OCR
- 84.5 Kimi K2.5
- 83.8
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 83.6 Nanonets-OCR-s
- 83.4 POINTS-Reader
- 78.4 Marker
- 1 OXR-1.0 97.0
- 2 TeleOCR 96.9
- 3 OvisOCR2 96.5
- 4 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 96.3
- 5 MinerU2.5-Pro 95.8
- 6 GLM-OCR 95.2
- 7 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 94.9
- 8 PaddleOCR-VL 94.2
- 9 Unlimited-OCR 94.0
- 10 Qianfan-OCR 93.9
- 11 Youtu-Parsing 93.7
- 12 Ovis2.6-30B-A3B 93.7
- 13 Logics-Parsing-v2 93.3
- 14 ABot-OCR 93.3
- 15 FireRed-OCR 93.3
- 16 MinerU-2.5 93.0
- 17
Gemini 3 Pro 92.9
- 18
Gemini 3 Flash 92.6
- 19 MonkeyOCR V2 91.8
- 20 dots.ocr 90.8
- 21 OpenDoc-0.1B 90.7
- 22 DeepSeek-OCR 2 90.3
- 23 HunyuanOCR 90.0
- 24
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.8
- 25 Dolphin-v2 89.5
- 26 OCRVerse 88.6
- 27 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 88.6
- 28 GPT-5.2 86.6
- 29 Dolphin-1.5 86.5
- 30 MinerU-Pipeline 86.5
- 31 olmOCR 85.7
- 32 Mistral OCR 85.7
- 33 Kimi K2.5 84.5
- 34
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 83.8
- 35 Nanonets-OCR-s 83.6
- 36 POINTS-Reader 83.4
- 37 Marker 78.4
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OXR-1.0 | 97.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | TeleOCR | 96.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | OvisOCR2 | 96.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 | 96.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | MinerU2.5-Pro | 95.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | GLM-OCR | 95.2 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | 94.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | PaddleOCR-VL | 94.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Unlimited-OCR | 94.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Qianfan-OCR | 93.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Youtu-Parsing | 93.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Ovis2.6-30B-A3B | 93.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Logics-Parsing-v2 | 93.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | ABot-OCR | 93.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | FireRed-OCR | 93.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | MinerU-2.5 | 93.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 92.9 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 92.6 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | MonkeyOCR V2 | 91.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | dots.ocr | 90.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | OpenDoc-0.1B | 90.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | DeepSeek-OCR 2 | 90.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | HunyuanOCR | 90.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | | 89.8 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Dolphin-v2 | 89.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | OCRVerse | 88.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | MonkeyOCR-pro-3B | 88.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | GPT-5.2 | 86.6 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Dolphin-1.5 | 86.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | MinerU-Pipeline | 86.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 31 | olmOCR | 85.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | Mistral OCR | 85.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 33 | Kimi K2.5 | 84.5 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 83.8 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Nanonets-OCR-s | 83.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | POINTS-Reader | 83.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | Marker | 78.4 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%