METR Time Horizon
Agents attempt software and research tasks timed against skilled humans. The score is the human task length at which the agent succeeds half the time.
Time Horizon 1.0 used 170 tasks in Vivaria. METR replaced it with Time Horizon 1.1 in January 2026 and re-estimated 14 models.
In the authors’ words
Despite rapid progress on AI benchmarks, the real-world meaning of benchmark performance remains unclear. To quantify the capabilities of AI systems in terms of human capabilities, we propose a new metric: 50%-task-completion time horizon. This is the time humans typically take to complete tasks that AI models can complete with 50% success rate. We first timed humans with relevant domain expertise on a combination of RE-Bench, HCAST, and 66 novel shorter tasks. On these tasks, current frontier AI models such as Claude 3.7 Sonnet have a 50% time horizon of around 50 minutes. Furthermore, frontier AI time horizon has been doubling approximately every seven months since 2019, though the trend may have accelerated in 2024. The increase in AI models' time horizons seems to be primarily driven by greater reliability and ability to adapt to mistakes, combined with better logical reasoning and tool use capabilities. We discuss the limitations of our results – including their degree of external validity – and the implications of increased autonomy for dangerous capabilities. If these results generalize to real-world software tasks, extrapolation of this trend predicts that within 5 years, AI systems will be capable of automating many software tasks that currently take humans a month.
- Level
- Research frontier Researchers, on open problems or tasks that take days
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Claude Opus 4.5 leads with 4.1 h among models released by Nov 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 4.1 h Claude Opus 4.5
- 2.7 h GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
- 2.2 h GPT-5
- 117 min Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 109 min Claude Opus 4.1
- 105 min Grok 4
- 91 min o3
- 84 min Claude Opus 4
- 74 min Claude Sonnet 4
- 58 min Kimi K2 Thinking
- 55 min Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 42 min o1
- 40 min
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 33 min
DeepSeek-R1
- 30 min Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 28 min
DeepSeek-R1
- 25 min
DeepSeek-V3
- 23 min o1-preview
- 20 min
DeepSeek-V3
- 20 min Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 10 min GPT-4o
- 9.4 min GPT-4 Turbo
- 7.8 min GPT-4 Turbo
- 7.1 min Claude 3 Opus
- 6.3 min GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024)
- 6.0 min GPT-4
- 5.8 min
Qwen2.5-72B
- 2.5 min
Qwen2-72B
- 0.6 min GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
- 0.1 min davinci-002
- 0.1 min GPT-2 (1.5B)
- 1 Claude Opus 4.5 4.1 h
- 2 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 2.7 h
- 3 GPT-5 2.2 h
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 117 min
- 5 Claude Opus 4.1 109 min
- 6 Grok 4 105 min
- 7 o3 91 min
- 8 Claude Opus 4 84 min
- 9 Claude Sonnet 4 74 min
- 10 Kimi K2 Thinking 58 min
- 11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 55 min
- 12 o1 42 min
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 40 min
- 14
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 33 min
- 15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 30 min
- 16
DeepSeek-R1 28 min
- 17
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 25 min
- 18 o1-preview 23 min
- 19
DeepSeek-V3 20 min
- 20 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20 min
- 21 GPT-4o May 2024 10 min
- 22 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 9.4 min
- 23 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 7.8 min
- 24 Claude 3 Opus 7.1 min
- 25 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 6.3 min
- 26 GPT-4 Mar 2023 6.0 min
- 27
Qwen2.5-72B 5.8 min
- 28
Qwen2-72B 2.5 min
- 29 GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct 0.6 min
- 30 davinci-002 0.1 min
- 31 GPT-2 (1.5B) 0.1 min
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 4.1 h | generate | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | 2.7 h | generate | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5 | 2.2 h | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 117 min | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 109 min | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Grok 4 | 105 min | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | o3 | 91 min | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4 | 84 min | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 74 min | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 58 min | generate | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 55 min | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | o1 | 42 min | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 40 min | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 33 min | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 30 min | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 28 min | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 25 min | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | o1-preview | 23 min | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 20 min | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 20 min | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 10 min | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 9.4 min | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 7.8 min | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Claude 3 Opus | 7.1 min | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) | 6.3 min | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 6.0 min | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 5.8 min | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 2.5 min | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct | 0.6 min | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | davinci-002 | 0.1 min | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | GPT-2 (1.5B) | 0.1 min | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard |
Epoch AI has scores for 39 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
7 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and Epoch AI’s runs.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
7 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | METR Time Horizon 1.1, METR did not treat the result as robust because of detected cheating, no number (9.1.3.6) | AI R&D risk | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | METR Time Horizon 1.1, METR did not treat the result as robust because of detected cheating, no number (9.1.3.6) | AI R&D risk | |
| 18 Nov 2025 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max system card | 162 | METR 50% time horizon, point estimate 2h42m, range 75 to 350 minutes (5.1.3.6) | Autonomy |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 system card | 135 | METR 50%-time horizon of about 2h15m (95% CI 65m to 4h30m) (5.1.3.7) | Autonomy |
| 16 Apr 2025 | o4-mini system card | 75 | METR time horizon score, 50% reliability, about 1 hour 15 minutes (3.9.1) | Autonomy |
| 16 Apr 2025 | o3 system card | 90 | METR time horizon score, 50% reliability, about 1 hour 30 minutes (3.9.1) | Autonomy |
| 27 Feb 2025 | GPT-4.5 system card | 30 | METR time horizon score, 50% reliability, around 30 minutes (Figure 1 caption, 3.4) | Autonomy |
Versions
More in AI research
- MLS-Bench In use Agent must invent one algorithmic change in an ML research scaffold whose gain transfers across settings. Scored relative to human baselines. Claude Fable 5.1 50.3%
- PaperBench In use Agent replicates ICML 2024 papers from scratch. LLM judge grades against author-written hierarchical rubrics.
Qwen 3.8 Max 93%
- MLE-bench In use Kaggle-style ML engineering competitions. Agent trains models and is scored against competition leaderboards. GPT-6 Astra 93.8%
- PostTrainBench 1.2 In use CLI agent gets a base model, one H100 and a time budget to post-train it for a target benchmark. Scored on normalized gain. Claude Fable 5.1 44.6%
- KernelBench In use Replace PyTorch operators with faster custom GPU kernels. Scored on correctness and speedup.
MiniMax-M3 28.8%
- OpenAI PRs Only in system cards Agents replicate internal OpenAI pull requests from a pre-PR branch and a prompt. Graded by hidden unit tests as pass@1. GPT-5.2 55%