Benchmark Almanac

KernelBench

MiniMax-M3 28.8% In use

Replace PyTorch operators with faster custom GPU kernels. Scored on correctness and speedup.

KernelBench v0.1 (July 2025) fixed problem sizes and numerics, added randomized tests and a Level 4 of Hugging Face models. The HF dataset tracks v0.1. xAI reports an internal derivative, KernelBenchInternal v1.1.

In the authors’ words

Efficient GPU kernels are crucial for building performant machine learning architectures, but writing them is a time-consuming challenge that requires significant expertise; therefore, we explore using language models (LMs) to automate kernel generation. We introduce KernelBench, an open-source framework for evaluating LMs' ability to write fast and correct kernels on a suite of 250 carefully selected PyTorch ML workloads. KernelBench represents a real-world engineering environment and making progress on the introduced benchmark directly translates to faster practical kernels. We introduce a new evaluation metric fast_p, which measures the percentage of generated kernels that are functionally correct and offer a speedup greater than an adjustable threshold p over baseline. Our experiments across various state-of-the-art models and test-time methods show that frontier reasoning models perform the best out of the box but still fall short overall, matching the PyTorch baseline in less than 20% of the cases. While we show that results can improve by leveraging execution and profiling feedback during iterative refinement, KernelBench remains a challenging benchmark, with its difficulty increasing as we raise speedup threshold p.

Abstract of KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels? (arXiv:2502.10517, CC0)
Made by Stanford Scaling Intelligence Released Dec 2024 GPU kernels All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

MiniMax-M3 leads with 28.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MiniMax-M3 28.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M3 28.8% Jun 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 28.8 KernelBench Hard

More in AI research

All 83 in AI research
  • MLS-Bench In use Agent must invent one algorithmic change in an ML research scaffold whose gain transfers across settings. Scored relative to human baselines. Claude Fable 5.1 50.3%
  • PaperBench In use Agent replicates ICML 2024 papers from scratch. LLM judge grades against author-written hierarchical rubrics. Qwen 3.8 Max 93%
  • MLE-bench In use Kaggle-style ML engineering competitions. Agent trains models and is scored against competition leaderboards. GPT-6 Astra 93.8%
  • PostTrainBench 1.2 In use CLI agent gets a base model, one H100 and a time budget to post-train it for a target benchmark. Scored on normalized gain. Claude Fable 5.1 44.6%
  • OpenAI PRs Only in system cards Agents replicate internal OpenAI pull requests from a pre-PR branch and a prompt. Graded by hidden unit tests as pass@1. GPT-5.2 55%
  • OpenAI Research Engineer Interview: Multiple Choice Only in system cards Models answer 97 multiple-choice questions drawn from OpenAI machine learning interview topics. Scored as cons@32. o4-mini 83%