MATH Level 5
Models solve the 1,324 hardest MATH test problems, drawn from competitions such as AMC and AIME. Scored by final answer match.
Near saturation, and contamination is likely because the problems have been public since 2021.
In the authors’ words
Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community.
- Level
- Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
GPT-5 leads with 98.1% among models released by Oct 2025
Best score per model in Epoch AI’s data. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Oct 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 98.1 GPT-5
- 97.8 GPT-5 mini
- 97.8 o4-mini
- 97.8 o3
- 97.7 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 97.1
Qwen3-Max
- 96.6
DeepSeek-R1
- 96.5 o3-mini
- 96.4 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 95.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 95.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 95.2 GPT-5 nano
- 94.7 o1
- 93.0
DeepSeek-R1
- 91.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 90.9 Grok-3 mini
- 89.9
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B
- 89.2 o1-mini
- 88.8 Grok 3
- 87.3 GPT-4.1 mini
- 87.1
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
- 85.0 Claude Opus 4
- 84.4 Claude Sonnet 4
- 83.5
Gemini 2.0 Pro
- 83.0 GPT-4.1
- 82.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 81.7 o1-preview
- 81.6
Mistral Medium 3
- 78.6 GPT-4.5
- 75.5
DeepSeek-V3
- 74.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 73.0
Llama 4 Maverick
- 70.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 70.0 GPT-4.1 nano
- 68.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 67.2
Qwen2.5-Max
- 65.3
Qwen Plus
- 64.9
Phi-4
- 64.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 63.5 Grok-2
- 63.2
Qwen2.5-72B
- 62.3
Llama 4 Scout
- 61.9
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 57.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 56.2
Qwen-Turbo
- 56.1
Qwen2.5-32B
- 53.3 GPT-4o
- 52.6 GPT-4o mini
- 51.7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 51.0 GPT-4o
- 50.3
Mistral Large 2
- 49.8
Llama 3.1-405B
- 49.8 GPT-4o
- 46.8
Mistral Small 3.1
- 46.7 GPT-4 Turbo
- 46.4 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 44.8
Mistral Large 2
- 44.8
Mistral Small 3
- 42.7
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
- 41.6
Llama 3.3 70B
- 40.8
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 40.0 GPT-4 Turbo
- 39.4
Llama 3.2 90B
- 39.1
Qwen2-72B
- 37.5 Claude 3 Opus
- 36.7
Llama 3.1-70B
- 27.9
Gemma 2 27B
- 25.7
WizardLM-2 8x22B
- 25.5
Yi-1.5-34B
- 25.1
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 24.5
Mistral Large
- 24.2
Mixtral 8x22B
- 23.0 GPT-4
- 22.9
Llama 3.1-8B
- 22.7 Hermes 2 Theta Llama-3 70B
- 22.6
Llama 3-70B
- 21.0
Gemma 2 9B
- 18.2 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 17.6
phi-3-medium 14B
- 15.9 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 14.9
Ministral 8B
- 14.9 Claude 3 Haiku
- 14.4
Ministral 3B
- 11.7 Claude 2
- 11.7
DBRX
- 11.6 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 11.2
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 10.8
Mistral NeMo
- 9.95
Mixtral 8x7B
- 6.39
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 6.13
Llama 3-8B
- 5.15
Yi-34B
- 3.68
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 3.29
Llama 2-70B
- 1 GPT-5 high 98.1%
- 2 GPT-5 mini high 97.8%
- 3 o4-mini high 97.8%
- 4 o3 high 97.8%
- 5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 32k thinking 97.7%
- 6
Qwen3-Max 97.1%
- 7
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 96.6%
- 8 o3-mini high 96.5%
- 9 Claude Haiku 4.5 32K 96.4%
- 10
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 95.9%
- 11
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 95.6%
- 12 GPT-5 nano medium 95.2%
- 13 o1 high 94.7%
- 14
DeepSeek-R1 93%
- 15 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 64k thinking 91.2%
- 16 Grok-3 mini low 90.9%
- 17
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B 89.9%
- 18 o1-mini high 89.2%
- 19 Grok 3 88.8%
- 20 GPT-4.1 mini 87.3%
- 21
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B 87.1%
- 22 Claude Opus 4 85%
- 23 Claude Sonnet 4 84.4%
- 24
Gemini 2.0 Pro 83.5%
- 25 GPT-4.1 83%
- 26
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 82.2%
- 27 o1-preview 81.7%
- 28
Mistral Medium 3 81.6%
- 29 GPT-4.5 78.6%
- 30
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 75.5%
- 31
Gemma 3 27B 74%
- 32
Llama 4 Maverick FP8 73%
- 33
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 70.4%
- 34 GPT-4.1 nano 70%
- 35
Qwen3-235B-A22B 68.9%
- 36
Qwen2.5-Max 67.2%
- 37
Qwen Plus Jan 2025 65.3%
- 38
Phi-4 64.9%
- 39
DeepSeek-V3 64.8%
- 40 Grok-2 Dec 2024 63.5%
- 41
Qwen2.5-72B 63.2%
- 42
Llama 4 Scout 62.3%
- 43
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 61.9%
- 44 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 57%
- 45
Qwen-Turbo 56.2%
- 46
Qwen2.5-32B 56.1%
- 47 GPT-4o Aug 2024 53.3%
- 48 GPT-4o mini 52.6%
- 49 Claude 3.5 Sonnet Jun 2024 51.7%
- 50 GPT-4o May 2024 51%
- 51
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 50.3%
- 52
Llama 3.1-405B 49.8%
- 53 GPT-4o Nov 2024 49.8%
- 54
Mistral Small 3.1 46.8%
- 55 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 46.7%
- 56 Claude 3.5 Haiku Oct 2024 46.4%
- 57
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 44.8%
- 58
Mistral Small 3 44.8%
- 59
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B 42.7%
- 60
Llama 3.3 70B 41.6%
- 61
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 40.8%
- 62 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 40%
- 63
Llama 3.2 90B 39.4%
- 64
Qwen2-72B 39.1%
- 65 Claude 3 Opus 37.5%
- 66
Llama 3.1-70B 36.7%
- 67
Gemma 2 27B 27.9%
- 68
WizardLM-2 8x22B 25.7%
- 69
Yi-1.5-34B 25.5%
- 70
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 25.1%
- 71
Mistral Large 24.5%
- 72
Mixtral 8x22B 24.2%
- 73 GPT-4 Jun 2023 23%
- 74
Llama 3.1-8B 22.9%
- 75 Hermes 2 Theta Llama-3 70B 22.7%
- 76
Llama 3-70B 22.6%
- 77
Gemma 2 9B 21%
- 78 Claude 3 Sonnet 18.2%
- 79
phi-3-medium 14B 17.6%
- 80 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 15.9%
- 81
Ministral 8B 14.9%
- 82 Claude 3 Haiku 14.9%
- 83
Ministral 3B 14.4%
- 84 Claude 2 11.7%
- 85
DBRX 11.7%
- 86 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 11.6%
- 87
Gemini 1.0 Pro 11.2%
- 88
Mistral NeMo 10.8%
- 89
Mixtral 8x7B 9.95%
- 90
DeepSeek LLM 67B 6.39%
- 91
Llama 3-8B 6.13%
- 92
Yi-34B 5.15%
- 93
Mistral 7B v0.3 3.68%
- 94
Llama 2-70B 3.29%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 98.1% | high | Aug 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 2 | GPT-5 mini | 97.8% | high | Aug 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 3 | o4-mini | 97.8% | high | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 4 | o3 | 97.8% | high | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 97.7% | 32k thinking | Sep 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 6 | | 97.1% | Sep 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 7 | | 96.6% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 8 | o3-mini | 96.5% | high | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 9 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 96.4% | 32K | Oct 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 10 | | 95.9% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 11 | | 95.6% | Mar 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 12 | GPT-5 nano | 95.2% | medium | Aug 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 13 | o1 | 94.7% | high | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI |
| 14 | | 93% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 15 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 91.2% | 64k thinking | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 16 | Grok-3 mini | 90.9% | low | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 17 | | 89.9% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 18 | o1-mini | 89.2% | high | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI |
| 19 | Grok 3 | 88.8% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 20 | GPT-4.1 mini | 87.3% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 21 | | 87.1% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 22 | Claude Opus 4 | 85% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 23 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 84.4% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 24 | | 83.5% | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 25 | GPT-4.1 | 83% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 26 | | 82.2% | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 27 | o1-preview | 81.7% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 28 | | 81.6% | May 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 29 | GPT-4.5 | 78.6% | Feb 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 30 | | 75.5% | Mar 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 31 | | 74% | Mar 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 32 | | 73% | FP8 | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI |
| 33 | | 70.4% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 34 | GPT-4.1 nano | 70% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 35 | | 68.9% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 36 | | 67.2% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 37 | | 65.3% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 38 | | 64.9% | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 39 | | 64.8% | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 40 | Grok-2 Dec 2024 | 63.5% | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 41 | | 63.2% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 42 | | 62.3% | Apr 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 43 | | 61.9% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 44 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 57% | Oct 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 45 | | 56.2% | Nov 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 46 | | 56.1% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 47 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 53.3% | Aug 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 48 | GPT-4o mini | 52.6% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 49 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 51.7% | Jun 2024 | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI |
| 50 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 51% | May 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 51 | | 50.3% | Nov 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 52 | | 49.8% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 53 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 49.8% | Nov 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 54 | | 46.8% | Mar 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 55 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 46.7% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 56 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 46.4% | Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | Epoch AI |
| 57 | | 44.8% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 58 | | 44.8% | Jan 2025 | Epoch AI | |
| 59 | | 42.7% | Nov 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 60 | | 41.6% | Dec 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 61 | | 40.8% | May 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 62 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 40% | Nov 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 63 | | 39.4% | Sep 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 64 | | 39.1% | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 65 | Claude 3 Opus | 37.5% | Feb 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 66 | | 36.7% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 67 | | 27.9% | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 68 | | 25.7% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 69 | | 25.5% | May 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 70 | | 25.1% | May 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 71 | | 24.5% | Feb 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 72 | | 24.2% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 73 | GPT-4 Jun 2023 | 23% | Jun 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 74 | | 22.9% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 75 | Hermes 2 Theta Llama-3 70B | 22.7% | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 76 | | 22.6% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 77 | | 21% | Jun 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 78 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 18.2% | Feb 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 79 | | 17.6% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 80 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 15.9% | Nov 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 81 | | 14.9% | Oct 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 82 | Claude 3 Haiku | 14.9% | Mar 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 83 | | 14.4% | Oct 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 84 | Claude 2 | 11.7% | Jul 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 85 | | 11.7% | Mar 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 86 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 11.6% | Jan 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 87 | | 11.2% | Dec 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 88 | | 10.8% | Jul 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 89 | | 9.95% | Dec 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 90 | | 6.39% | Nov 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 91 | | 6.13% | Apr 2024 | Epoch AI | |
| 92 | | 5.15% | Nov 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 93 | | 3.68% | Sep 2023 | Epoch AI | |
| 94 | | 3.29% | Jul 2023 | Epoch AI |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
12 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Sep 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2025 | LFM2-8B-A1B | 62.4 | MATH Lvl 5 |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2025 | LFM2-8B-A1B technical report | 62.4 | MATH Lvl 5, LFM2-8B-A1B (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 28 Nov 2025 | LFM2-1.2B technical report | 18.6 | MATH Lvl 5, LFM2-1.2B (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Math
- IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
- AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
- HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
- MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
- PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked.
Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
- USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%