IFMTBench
Models translate text while following explicit instructions, such as keeping JSON or HTML structure, using a glossary, using provided context and matching a register. It covers seven languages with 4,506 single-constraint and 2,838 multi-constraint items. Deterministic checkers verify some constraints, and a rubric-based model judge scores the rest.
Tencent released it with its Hy-MT2 translation models on May 21st, 2026 and reports it in the Hy-MT2 report. The repository stars (about 1,500) belong to the Hy-MT2 model release, not to the benchmark alone.
- Made by
- Tencent Hunyuan
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Translation
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemma 4 31B IT #100 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Modern translation workflows demand more than semantic equivalence. Users routinely require models to preserve JSON or HTML schemas, honor curated glossaries, disambiguate with provided context, and match prescribed registers, often several at once. Conventional metrics such as BLEU and xCOMET capture semantic fidelity but provide little signal on constraint adherence, while general instruction following benchmarks ignore the cross-lingual nature of translation. We introduce \bench, a benchmark for multilingual translation instruction following covering seven languages, with 4,506 single-constraint and 2,838 multi-constraint items spanning six constraint dimensions and five compositional patterns with instructions issued in all seven languages. Constraints are split into a gating subset verified by deterministic checkers and a continuous subset scored by a rubric-based LLM judge, combined under a multiplicative rule that resists reward hacking. Evaluating 15 models reveals systematic gaps that prior protocols miss: Instruction following scales with size more sharply than translation quality, glossary and structured-format constraints dominate the difficulty gradient, and general instruction following rankings correlate only weakly with translation behavior. Our benchmark are available at https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/Hy-MT2/tree/main/IFMTBench.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 89.1%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3.5-27B, at 81.1%.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 89.1%
- 2 Hy-MT2 A3B 85.7%
- 3 Hy-MT2 7B 83.1%
- 4
Qwen3.5-27B 81.1%
- 5
Gemma 4 31B IT 79.6%
- 6 gemma4 A4B 79.6%
- 7 Qwen3.6 A3B 75.4%
- 8 Qwen3.5 A3B 74.1%
- 9
Gemma 4 E4B 72.6%
- 10
Qwen3.5-9B 71.2%
- 11 Hy-MT2 1.8B 69.4%
- 12
Qwen3.5-4B 66.7%
- 13
Gemma 4 E2B 58.7%
- 14
Qwen3.5-2B 43.1%
- 15
Qwen3.5-0.8B 28%
Source: Official IFMTBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 89.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Hy-MT2 A3B | 85.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Hy-MT2 7B | 83.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | | 81.1% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 79.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | gemma4 A4B | 79.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Qwen3.6 A3B | 75.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Qwen3.5 A3B | 74.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 72.6% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 71.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Hy-MT2 1.8B | 69.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | | 66.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 58.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 43.1% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 28% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official IFMTBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official IFMTBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%