Benchmark Almanac

Harvey LAB (Legal Agent Benchmark)

Muse Spark 1.2 25.4% leads since Aug 2026 In use

Agent works through legal matter files across 24+ practice areas and produces work product. Expert rubric, task passes only if every criterion passes.

All-pass scoring keeps it far from saturated: at launch Opus 4.7 led at 7.1% on Harvey's private holdout. Vals HLAB v1.1 (2026-10-21) top is 27.1% on 120 holdout tasks while per-criterion pass is ~93-96%. Harvey ran its own baselines. Vals now runs the board. Repo keeps a score-impact CHANGELOG so results at two commits can be checked for comparability. Dataset field is a community Harbor port (1,760 tasks, not official).

Made by Harvey Released May 2026 Law Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
80
Models scored on its own leaderboard
13
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
15
System cards report it, from 5 labs

Muse Spark 1.2 leads with 25.4%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

80 models. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 25.4 Muse Spark 1.2
  2. 23.8 Muse Spark 1.3
  3. 21.7 Muse Wonder Full
  4. 20.0 Muse Spark 1.1
  5. 19.6 Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 19.2 GLM Legal
  7. 17.1 Muse Wonder
  8. 16.7 Muse Spark Open
  9. 15.8 Grok 4.6
  10. 15.8 Mistral Large 4
  11. 12.9 Grok 4.5
  12. 12.9 Kimi K3
  13. 12.5 Grok 4.7
  14. 11.3 Claude Fable 5
  15. 11.3 Qwen 3.8 27B
  16. 11.3 MiMo-V2.6 Flash
  17. 10.8 MiMo-V2.6 Pro
  18. 10.4 Qwen 3.8 Max
  19. 10.0 Gemini 3.8 Flash
  20. 9.58 Claude Opus 4.8
  21. 9.17 Tencent Hy4 preview
  22. 9.17 Step 5 Preview
  23. 9.17 Ember-1
  24. 9.17 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  25. 8.75 Gemini 3.7 Flash
  26. 8.33 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
  27. 8.33 GLM-5.3
  28. 7.50 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
  29. 7.08 GLM-5.2
  30. 6.67 Claude Opus 4.7
  31. 6.67 Claude Opus 5
  32. 6.67 GLM-5.3-Flash
  33. 6.67 Claude Fable 5.1
  34. 6.67 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
  35. 5.42 GPT-6 Astra
  36. 5.42 GPT-6.1 Sol
  37. 5.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6
  38. 5.00 Claude Sonnet 5
  39. 4.17 MiniMax-M3
  40. 3.75 GPT-5.5
  41. 3.75 DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  42. 3.75 Claude Opus 5.5
  43. 3.33 Gemini 3.6 Flash
  44. 2.92 GPT-6 Luna
  45. 2.92 Claude Sonnet 5.5
  46. 2.50 Gemini 3.5 Flash
  47. 2.50 GPT-5.6 Sol
  48. 2.08 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  49. 2.08 Inkling
  50. 1.67 Kimi K2.6
  51. 1.67 MiMo-V2.5
  52. 1.67 Qwen3.7-Max
  53. 1.67 Inkling-Small
  54. 1.67 GPT-6 Sol
  55. 1.25 Qwen 3.6 Plus
  56. 1.25 GPT-5.6 Luna
  57. 1.25 Ling-3.0-flash
  58. 1.25 Claude Haiku 5.5
  59. 0.83 Claude Haiku 4.5
  60. 0.83 GPT-5.6 Terra
  61. 0.42 Mistral Medium 3.5
  62. 0.42 Grok 4.3
  63. 0.42 Nemotron 3 Ultra
  64. 0.0 Gemini 3 Flash
  65. 0.0 Kimi K2.5
  66. 0.0 Grok 4.20
  67. 0.0 Gemini 3.1 Pro
  68. 0.0 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
  69. 0.0 GPT-5.4
  70. 0.0 GPT-5.4 Mini
  71. 0.0 GPT-5.4 Nano
  72. 0.0 MiniMax-M2.7
  73. 0.0 GLM-5.1
  74. 0.0 Laguna M.1
  75. 0.0 Laguna XS.2
  76. 0.0 Qwen3.7-Plus
  77. 0.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  78. 0.0 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
  79. 0.0 Ling-3.0-flash-Fin
  80. 0.0 Mercury 2.5
  1. 1 Muse Spark 1.2 25.4%
  2. 2 Muse Spark 1.3 max 23.8%
  3. 3 Muse Wonder Full 21.7%
  4. 4 Muse Spark 1.1 20%
  5. 5 Gemini 4 Argon 19.6%
  6. 6 GLM Legal 19.2%
  7. 7 Muse Wonder 17.1%
  8. 8 Muse Spark Open 16.7%
  9. 9 Grok 4.6 15.8%
  10. 10 Mistral Large 4 15.8%
  11. 11 Grok 4.5 12.9%
  12. 12 Kimi K3 12.9%
  13. 13 Grok 4.7 12.5%
  14. 14 Claude Fable 5 11.3%
  15. 15 Qwen 3.8 27B 11.3%
  16. 16 MiMo-V2.6 Flash 11.3%
  17. 17 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 10.8%
  18. 18 Qwen 3.8 Max 10.4%
  19. 19 Gemini 3.8 Flash 10%
  20. 20 Claude Opus 4.8 9.58%
  21. 21 Tencent Hy4 preview 9.17%
  22. 22 Step 5 Preview 9.17%
  23. 23 Ember-1 9.17%
  24. 24 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 9.17%
  25. 25 Gemini 3.7 Flash 8.75%
  26. 26 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 8.33%
  27. 27 GLM-5.3 8.33%
  28. 28 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 7.50%
  29. 29 GLM-5.2 7.08%
  30. 30 Claude Opus 4.7 6.67%
  31. 31 Claude Opus 5 6.67%
  32. 32 GLM-5.3-Flash 6.67%
  33. 33 Claude Fable 5.1 6.67%
  34. 34 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 6.67%
  35. 35 GPT-6 Astra 5.42%
  36. 36 GPT-6.1 Sol 5.42%
  37. 37 Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.00%
  38. 38 Claude Sonnet 5 5.00%
  39. 39 MiniMax-M3 4.17%
  40. 40 GPT-5.5 3.75%
  41. 41 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 3.75%
  42. 42 Claude Opus 5.5 3.75%
  43. 43 Gemini 3.6 Flash 3.33%
  44. 44 GPT-6 Luna 2.92%
  45. 45 Claude Sonnet 5.5 2.92%
  46. 46 Gemini 3.5 Flash 2.50%
  47. 47 GPT-5.6 Sol 2.50%
  48. 48 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 2.08%
  49. 49 Inkling 2.08%
  50. 50 Kimi K2.6 1.67%
  51. 51 MiMo-V2.5 1.67%
  52. 52 Qwen3.7-Max 1.67%
  53. 53 Inkling-Small 1.67%
  54. 54 GPT-6 Sol 1.67%
  55. 55 Qwen 3.6 Plus 1.25%
  56. 56 GPT-5.6 Luna 1.25%
  57. 57 Ling-3.0-flash 1.25%
  58. 58 Claude Haiku 5.5 1.25%
  59. 59 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 0.83%
  60. 60 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.83%
  61. 61 Mistral Medium 3.5 0.42%
  62. 62 Grok 4.3 0.42%
  63. 63 Nemotron 3 Ultra 0.42%
  64. 64 Gemini 3 Flash 0%
  65. 65 Kimi K2.5 thinking 0%
  66. 66 Grok 4.20 0%
  67. 67 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0%
  68. 68 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 0%
  69. 69 GPT-5.4 xhigh 0%
  70. 70 GPT-5.4 Mini 0%
  71. 71 GPT-5.4 Nano 0%
  72. 72 MiniMax-M2.7 0%
  73. 73 GLM-5.1 0%
  74. 74 Laguna M.1 0%
  75. 75 Laguna XS.2 0%
  76. 76 Qwen3.7-Plus 0%
  77. 77 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 0%
  78. 78 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 0%
  79. 79 Ling-3.0-flash-Fin 0%
  80. 80 Mercury 2.5 0%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Spark 1.2 25.4% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Muse Spark 1.3 23.8% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Muse Wonder Full 21.7% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Muse Spark 1.1 20% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 4 Argon 19.6% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM Legal 19.2% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Muse Wonder 17.1% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Muse Spark Open 16.7% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Grok 4.6 15.8% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Mistral Large 4 15.8% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4.5 12.9% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Kimi K3 12.9% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Grok 4.7 12.5% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Fable 5 11.3% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen 3.8 27B 11.3% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 MiMo-V2.6 Flash 11.3% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
17 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 10.8% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Qwen 3.8 Max 10.4% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 3.8 Flash 10% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Opus 4.8 9.58% May 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Tencent Hy4 preview 9.17% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Step 5 Preview 9.17% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Ember-1 9.17% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 9.17% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Gemini 3.7 Flash 8.75% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
26 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 8.33% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
27 GLM-5.3 8.33% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
28 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 7.50% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
29 GLM-5.2 7.08% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
30 Claude Opus 4.7 6.67% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
31 Claude Opus 5 6.67% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
32 GLM-5.3-Flash 6.67% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
33 Claude Fable 5.1 6.67% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
34 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 6.67% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
35 GPT-6 Astra 5.42% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
36 GPT-6.1 Sol 5.42% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
37 Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.00% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
38 Claude Sonnet 5 5.00% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
39 MiniMax-M3 4.17% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
40 GPT-5.5 3.75% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
41 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 3.75% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
42 Claude Opus 5.5 3.75% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
43 Gemini 3.6 Flash 3.33% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
44 GPT-6 Luna 2.92% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
45 Claude Sonnet 5.5 2.92% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
46 Gemini 3.5 Flash 2.50% May 2026 Official leaderboard
47 GPT-5.6 Sol 2.50% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
48 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 2.08% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
49 Inkling 2.08% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
50 Kimi K2.6 1.67% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
51 MiMo-V2.5 1.67% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
52 Qwen3.7-Max 1.67% May 2026 Official leaderboard
53 Inkling-Small 1.67% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
54 GPT-6 Sol 1.67% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
55 Qwen 3.6 Plus 1.25% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
56 GPT-5.6 Luna 1.25% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
57 Ling-3.0-flash 1.25% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
58 Claude Haiku 5.5 1.25% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
59 Claude Haiku 4.5 0.83% thinking Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
60 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.83% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
61 Mistral Medium 3.5 0.42% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
62 Grok 4.3 0.42% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
63 Nemotron 3 Ultra 0.42% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
64 Gemini 3 Flash 0% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
65 Kimi K2.5 0% thinking Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
66 Grok 4.20 0% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
67 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
68 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 0% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
69 GPT-5.4 0% xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
70 GPT-5.4 Mini 0% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
71 GPT-5.4 Nano 0% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
72 MiniMax-M2.7 0% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
73 GLM-5.1 0% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
74 Laguna M.1 0% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
75 Laguna XS.2 0% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
76 Qwen3.7-Plus 0% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
77 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 0% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
78 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 0% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
79 Ling-3.0-flash-Fin 0% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
80 Mercury 2.5 0% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 17 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

The best score, 25.4%, costs $2.09 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Xiaomi Corp Meta DeepSeek NVIDIA Z.ai Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 10% 20% 30% $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 Cost per task, log scale Muse Spark 1.2 Muse Spark 1.1 GLM Legal MiMo-V2.6 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 MiMo-V2.5 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 0% 10% 20% 30% $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 Cost per task, log scale Muse Spark 1.2 Muse Spark 1.1
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 25.4% $2.09
Muse Spark 1.3 max 23.8% $2.26
Muse Spark 1.3 22.9% $2.76
Muse Wonder Full 21.7% $5.41
Muse Spark 1.1 20% $0.80
Gemini 4 Argon 19.6% $11
GLM Legal 19.2% $0.15
Muse Wonder 17.1% $7.08
Muse Spark Open 16.7% $6.83
Grok 4.6 15.8% $4.01
Mistral Large 4 15.8% $4.18
Grok 4.5 12.9% $2.02
Kimi K3 12.9% $3.83
Grok 4.7 12.5% $11
Claude Fable 5 11.3% $19
Qwen 3.8 27B 11.3% $4.03
MiMo-V2.6 Flash 11.3% $0.09
MiMo-V2.6 Pro 10.8% $0.22
Qwen 3.8 Max 10.4% $2.37
Gemini 3.8 Flash 10% $3.66
Claude Opus 4.8 9.58% $10
Tencent Hy4 preview 9.17% $0.98
Step 5 Preview 9.17% $1.00
Ember-1 9.17% $3.33
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 9.17% $0.54
Gemini 3.7 Flash 8.75% $2.56
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 8.33% $0.06
GLM-5.3 8.33% $4.30
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 7.50% $0.17
GLM-5.2 7.08% $2.06
Claude Opus 4.7 6.67% $11
Claude Opus 5 6.67% $24
GLM-5.3-Flash 6.67% $0.57
Claude Fable 5.1 6.67% $46
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 6.67% $0.17
GPT-6 Astra 5.42% $26
GPT-6.1 Sol 5.42% $3.93
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.00% $3.04
Claude Sonnet 5 5.00% $8.95
MiniMax-M3 4.17% $1.46
GPT-5.5 3.75% $4.60
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 3.75% $0.74
Claude Opus 5.5 3.75% $21
Gemini 3.6 Flash 3.33% $1.90
GPT-6 Luna 2.92% $0.30
Claude Sonnet 5.5 2.92% $17
Gemini 3.5 Flash 2.50% $2.12
GPT-5.6 Sol 2.50% $10
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 2.08% $0.11
Inkling 2.08% $1.25
Kimi K2.6 1.67% $0.82
MiMo-V2.5 1.67% $0.04
Qwen3.7-Max 1.67% $1.58
Inkling-Small 1.67% $0.17
GPT-6 Sol 1.67% $3.36
Qwen 3.6 Plus 1.25% $3.94
GPT-5.6 Luna 1.25% $0.38
Ling-3.0-flash 1.25% $0.05
Claude Haiku 5.5 1.25% $3.39
Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 0.83% $0.42
GPT-5.6 Terra 0.83% $3.20
Mistral Medium 3.5 0.42% $6.07
Grok 4.3 0.42% $0.39
Nemotron 3 Ultra 0.42%
Gemini 3 Flash 0% $0.26
Kimi K2.5 thinking 0% $0.35
Grok 4.20 0% $0.99
Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% $1.15
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 0% $0.08
GPT-5.4 xhigh 0% $3.60
GPT-5.4 Mini 0% $1.00
GPT-5.4 Nano 0% $0.18
MiniMax-M2.7 0% $0.49
GLM-5.1 0% $0.56
Laguna M.1 0%
Laguna XS.2 0%
Qwen3.7-Plus 0% $0.23
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 0% $0.33
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 0% $0.03
Ling-3.0-flash-Fin 0% $0.05
Mercury 2.5 0% $0.19

6 models have held number one since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic xAI Meta Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard 6 leaders
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2026, by Kimi K3
Kimi K3 94.6%

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3 Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3 Muse Spark 1.1

6 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
Moonshot AI
xAI
Google DeepMind
Mistral AI
Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
24 Oct 2026 Kimi K3.1 Pro 23.7 Harvey Legal Agent (public 1,251 tasks, Stirrup harness, all-pass rate)
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon 19.6 Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark
12 Oct 2026 Muse Wonder 10 Harvey LAB-AA
12 Oct 2026 Muse Wonder Full 13.1 Harvey LAB-AA
6 Oct 2026 Mistral Large 4 15.8 Harvey's Legal Agent: Vals.ai - Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey LAB)
21 Sep 2026 Grok 4.7 19.6 Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark (Legal work)
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash 10 Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (All pass rate)
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash 90.7 Harvey LAB-AA
12 Aug 2026 Grok 4.6 15.8 Harvey LAB (Vals)
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 11.7 Legal Legal Agent Benchmark, Held-out
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 94.6 Harvey Lab-AA
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 8.9 Best of Legal Agent Benchmark Full Public Set / Legal Agent Benchmark Harvey's Held-Out Set
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 16.9 Best of Legal Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey's Held-Out Set) / Legal Agent Full Public Benchmark Set

15 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon model card 19.6 Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (results table, p.5) Capabilities
12 Oct 2026 Muse Wonder model card 10 Harvey LAB-AA, Artificial Analysis version 1.1 with hallucination checks, Muse Wonder (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) Capabilities
12 Oct 2026 Muse Wonder Full model card 13.1 Harvey LAB-AA, Artificial Analysis version 1.1 with hallucination checks, Muse Wonder Full (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) Capabilities
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card 11.7 Legal Agent Benchmark held-out set, all-pass rate at high effort, mean criterion pass 92.1% (max effort 10% and 93.1%) (8.14.2) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 8.3 Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey LAB) held-out set of 120 problems, all-pass rate at max effort, run by Artificial Analysis (mean criterion pass rate 91.2%) (8.14.2) Capabilities
21 Sep 2026 Grok 4.7 model card 19.6 Legal Agent Benchmark, Harvey final score, xhigh, Vals AI 120-task held-out run in Valkyrie (3.1) Capabilities
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash model card 10 Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, all pass rate (results table, p.5) Capabilities
1 Sep 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card 19.1 Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey LAB), all-pass rate on 1,235 public problems, max effort, internal harness, mean criterion pass rate 90.81%; held-out set run by Artificial Analysis 16.7% all-pass at xhigh (8.15.2) Capabilities
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash model card 90.7 Harvey LAB-AA (results table, p.5) Capabilities
12 Aug 2026 Grok 4.6 model card 15.8 Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), score, high, Vals AI Valkyrie harness (3.5) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 94.6 Harvey Lab-AA, criterion pass rate, cited from Artificial Analysis (Table 2) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 23.6 Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey LAB), all-pass rate on 1,235 public problems, max effort, internal harness, production safeguards, mean criterion pass rate 93.74%. Harvey's held-out set: 11.7% all-pass, 94.1% mean criterion (8.13.3) Capabilities
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 5.8 Legal Agent Benchmark, Harvey's held-out set, all-pass rate per Harvey's evaluation, mean criterion pass 91.2%. Full public set (1,235 problems, internal harness) 8.92% all-pass and 88.26% mean criterion (Table 8.1.A, 8.11.3) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 13.3 Legal Agent Benchmark, Harvey's held-out set, all-pass rate, Harvey's evaluation as of June 2026 (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.4) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 9.62 Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey LAB), all-pass rate on 1,235 public problems, internal reimplementation, max effort, five trials, mean criterion pass rate 89.01% (8.13.3) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic Meta Moonshot AI Google DeepMind
Harvey LAB v1.1 (HLAB-Vals-1.1) 6 leaders
Harvey LAB (Legal Agent Benchmark) Passed 85% in Jul 2026, by Kimi K3
Kimi K3 94.6%

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%