Benchmark Almanac

FLORES-200

Cohere Command A 81.2 Dropped

Models translate English Wikipedia sentences into about 200 languages. Outputs are scored with BLEU or chrF against human reference translations.

Extends FLORES-101 to about 200 languages. The flores record covers FLORES-101.

In the authors’ words

Driven by the goal of eradicating language barriers on a global scale, machine translation has solidified itself as a key focus of artificial intelligence research today. However, such efforts have coalesced around a small subset of languages, leaving behind the vast majority of mostly low-resource languages. What does it take to break the 200 language barrier while ensuring safe, high quality results, all while keeping ethical considerations in mind? In No Language Left Behind, we took on this challenge by first contextualizing the need for low-resource language translation support through exploratory interviews with native speakers. Then, we created datasets and models aimed at narrowing the performance gap between low and high-resource languages. More specifically, we developed a conditional compute model based on Sparsely Gated Mixture of Experts that is trained on data obtained with novel and effective data mining techniques tailored for low-resource languages. We propose multiple architectural and training improvements to counteract overfitting while training on thousands of tasks. Critically, we evaluated the performance of over 40,000 different translation directions using a human-translated benchmark, Flores-200, and combined human evaluation with a novel toxicity benchmark covering all languages in Flores-200 to assess translation safety. Our model achieves an improvement of 44% BLEU relative to the previous state-of-the-art, laying important groundwork towards realizing a universal translation system. Finally, we open source all contributions described in this work, accessible at https://github.com/facebookresearch/fairseq/tree/nllb.

Abstract of No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation (arXiv:2207.04672, CC0)
Made by Meta AI (NLLB Team) Released Jul 2022 Translation All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Cohere Command A leads with 81.2

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Cohere Command A 81.2
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Cohere Command A 81.2 Apr 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
81.2 2025 81.2 2025

No launch post has listed it since Sep 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Sep 2025 Hunyuan-MT-7B 88.6 Mean of FLORES-200 ZH→XX 87.6 / XX→ZH 85.3 / EN→XX 91.1 / XX→EN 90.2 (XCOMET-XXL)

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
5 Sep 2025 Hunyuan-MT-7B technical report Flores-200 XCOMET-XXL ZH to XX 87.58, XX to ZH 85.28, EN to XX 91.12, XX to EN 90.18, XX to XX 78.29, no overall score (Table 4). CometKiwi 79.63, 78.63, 87.42, 84.77, 72.10 Capabilities
1 Apr 2025 Cohere Command A technical report 81.2 FLORES COMET-20 average (Table 7) Capabilities
11 Jul 2023 Claude 2 model card Flores 200, English to 43 languages, BLEU per language, chart without printed values (4.1, Figure 7) Capabilities

Versions

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%