Benchmark Almanac

CorpBench Work

GPT-5.6 Luna 92.7 leads since September 2026
Not in model cards

Agents carry out 100 business workflows across finance, marketing, operations, RevOps and sales, 20 per department, using simulated business systems and tool contracts. Grading checks the final state, the actions taken, and whether the agent finished the job or escalated it correctly.

Revensi, a company that builds AI agents for businesses, runs the board, which listed 18 models including local ones. The current library is Work 1.3. The repository had 0 GitHub stars on November 5th, 2026, and no outside use was found.

Made by
Revensi
Released
September 2026
Kind
Running a business
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Muse Spark 1.3 #26 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
18
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track

GPT-5.6 Luna leads with 92.7 among models released by September 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.6 Luna CorpBench Work v1.3 92.7
  2. 2 MiniMax-M3 CorpBench Work v1.3 89.6
  3. 3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 89.2
  4. 4 Muse Spark 1.3 CorpBench Work v1.3 88.1
  5. 5 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite CorpBench Work v1.3 87.3
  6. 6 GLM-5.3-Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 84.6
  7. 7 Gemma 4 E4B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 84.0
  8. 8 MiMo-V2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 79.1
  9. 9 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B CorpBench Work v1.3 79.1
  10. 10 Tencent Hy3 CorpBench Work v1.3 78.6
  11. 11 Mercury 2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 75.7
  12. 12 Claude Haiku 4.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 75.6
  13. 13 Mistral Small 4 CorpBench Work v1.3 74.8
  14. 14 Inkling-Small CorpBench Work v1.3 66.2
  15. 15 Qwen3.8 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 62.9
  16. 16 Qwen3.5-9B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 62.4
  17. 17 ministral-3:8b CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 46.7
  18. 18 Granite 4.2 8B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 31.1

Source: Official CorpBench Work leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Luna 92.7 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 MiniMax-M3 89.6 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 89.2 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Muse Spark 1.3 88.1 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 87.3 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-5.3-Flash 84.6 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemma 4 E4B 84.0 CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768, Ollama Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
8 MiMo-V2.5 79.1 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 79.1 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Tencent Hy3 78.6 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Mercury 2.5 75.7 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Claude Haiku 4.5 75.6 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Mistral Small 4 74.8 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Inkling-Small 66.2 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3.8 Flash 62.9 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3.5-9B 62.4 CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768, Ollama Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
17 ministral-3:8b 46.7 CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768, Ollama Official leaderboard
18 Granite 4.2 8B 31.1 CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768, Ollama Aug 2026 Official leaderboard

Performance versus cost

The line joins the runs that no other run beats on both measures. We redrew this chart from the numbers on the official leaderboard.

60 70 80 90 100 $0.001$0.01$0.1 Mean cost per task ($), log scale, lower is better CorpBench Score Claude Haiku 4.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 75.6, mean cost per task $0.06 MiniMax-M3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 89.6, mean cost per task $0.005 Tencent Hy3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 78.6, mean cost per task $0.003 Inkling-Small (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 66.2, mean cost per task $0.008 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 87.3, mean cost per task $0.01 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 79.1, mean cost per task $0.004 GLM-5.3-Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 84.6, mean cost per task $0.003 Qwen3.8 Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 62.9, mean cost per task $0.004 Muse Spark 1.3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 88.1, mean cost per task $0.03 Mercury 2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 75.7, mean cost per task $0.002 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 89.2, mean cost per task $0.003 Mistral Small 4 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 74.8, mean cost per task $0.001 MiMo-V2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 79.1, mean cost per task $0.002 GPT-5.6 Luna (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 92.7, mean cost per task $0.002 GPT-5.6 Luna (CorpBench Work v1.3)MiMo-V2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3)Mistral Small 4 (CorpBench Work v1.3) 60 70 80 90 100 $0.001$0.01$0.1 Mean cost per task ($), log scale, lower is better CorpBench Score Claude Haiku 4.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 75.6, mean cost per task $0.06 MiniMax-M3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 89.6, mean cost per task $0.005 Tencent Hy3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 78.6, mean cost per task $0.003 Inkling-Small (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 66.2, mean cost per task $0.008 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 87.3, mean cost per task $0.01 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 79.1, mean cost per task $0.004 GLM-5.3-Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 84.6, mean cost per task $0.003 Qwen3.8 Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 62.9, mean cost per task $0.004 Muse Spark 1.3 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 88.1, mean cost per task $0.03 Mercury 2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 75.7, mean cost per task $0.002 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 89.2, mean cost per task $0.003 Mistral Small 4 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 74.8, mean cost per task $0.001 MiMo-V2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 79.1, mean cost per task $0.002 GPT-5.6 Luna (CorpBench Work v1.3): CorpBench Score 92.7, mean cost per task $0.002 GPT-5.6 Luna (CorpBench Work v1.3)MiMo-V2.5 (CorpBench Work v1.3)Mistral Small 4 (CorpBench Work v1.3)
ModelSettingCorpBench ScoreMean cost per task
GPT-5.6 Luna CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 92.7 $0
MiniMax-M3 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 89.6 $0.01
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 89.2 $0
Muse Spark 1.3 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 88.1 $0.03
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 87.3 $0.01
GLM-5.3-Flash CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 84.6 $0
MiMo-V2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 79.1 $0
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 79.1 $0
Tencent Hy3 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 78.6 $0
Mercury 2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 75.7 $0
Claude Haiku 4.5 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 75.6 $0.06
Mistral Small 4 CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 74.8 $0
Inkling-Small CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 66.2 $0.01
Qwen3.8 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3, CorpBench 62.9 $0

The best score, 92.7, costs $0.002 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Mistral AI Xiaomi Corp OpenAI Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 $0.001 $0.002 $0.005 $0.01 $0.02 $0.05 $0.10 Cost per task, log scale GPT-5.6 Luna, CorpBench Work v1.3 MiMo-V2.5, CorpBench Work v1.3 Mistral Small 4, CorpBench Work v1.3 0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 $0.001 $0.01 $0.10 Cost per task, log scale GPT-5.6 Luna, CorpBench Work v1.3 MiMo-V2.5, CorpBench Work v1.3

Source: Official CorpBench Work leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 92.7 $0.002
MiniMax-M3 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 89.6 $0.005
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 89.2 $0.003
Muse Spark 1.3 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 88.1 $0.03
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 87.3 $0.01
GLM-5.3-Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 84.6 $0.003
Gemma 4 E4B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 Ollama 84.0
MiMo-V2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 79.1 $0.002
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 79.1 $0.004
Tencent Hy3 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 78.6 $0.003
Mercury 2.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 75.7 $0.002
Claude Haiku 4.5 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 75.6 $0.06
Mistral Small 4 CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 74.8 $0.001
Inkling-Small CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 66.2 $0.008
Qwen3.8 Flash CorpBench Work v1.3 CorpBench 62.9 $0.004
Qwen3.5-9B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 Ollama 62.4
Granite 4.2 8B CorpBench Work v1.3; Q4_K_M; context 32768 Ollama 31.1

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2026

Source: Official CorpBench Work leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2026 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2026

Source: Official CorpBench Work leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%