Benchmark Almanac

AndroidLab

AutoGLM-Phone-9B-Multilingual 47.7% tops its leaderboard GPT-4o Nov 2024 31.2% leads the models we track Not in model cards

Mobile agents complete 138 tasks across nine apps on predefined Android virtual devices, in text-only and multimodal modes. Checks on the final device state score each task.

It ships its own agent framework and training data alongside the benchmark.

In the authors’ words

Autonomous agents have become increasingly important for interacting with the real world. Android agents, in particular, have been recently a frequently-mentioned interaction method. However, existing studies for training and evaluating Android agents lack systematic research on both open-source and closed-source models. In this work, we propose AndroidLab as a systematic Android agent framework. It includes an operation environment with different modalities, action space, and a reproducible benchmark. It supports both large language models (LLMs) and multimodal models (LMMs) in the same action space. AndroidLab benchmark includes predefined Android virtual devices and 138 tasks across nine apps built on these devices. By using the AndroidLab environment, we develop an Android Instruction dataset and train six open-source LLMs and LMMs, lifting the average success rates from 4.59% to 21.50% for LLMs and from 1.93% to 13.28% for LMMs. AndroidLab is open-sourced and publicly available at https://github.com/THUDM/Android-Lab.

Abstract of AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agents (arXiv:2410.24024, CC0)
Made by Tsinghua University and Zhipu AI (THUDM) Released Oct 2024 Phones All tasks public Last model added Nov 2024 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

AutoGLM-Phone-9B-Multilingual tops the leaderboard with 47.7%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4o, at 31.2%.

  1. 1 AutoGLM-Phone-9B-Multilingual screenshot 47.7%
  2. 2 AutoGLM-Mobile screenshot + xml 46.8%
  3. 3 MobileUse screenshot 44.2%
  4. 4 UI-Genie-Agent screenshot + xml 41.2%
  5. 5 V-Droid (Llama8B) xml 38.3%
  6. 6 AutoGLM-2024-10 screenshot + xml 36.2%
  7. 7 GPT-4o Nov 2024, screenshot 31.2%
  8. 8 LLaMA3.1-8B(ft) xml 23.9%
  9. 9 GLM4-9B(ft) xml 21%
  10. 10 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024, xml 18.8%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 AutoGLM-Phone-9B-Multilingual 47.7% screenshot Official leaderboard
2 AutoGLM-Mobile 46.8% screenshot + xml Official leaderboard
3 MobileUse 44.2% screenshot Official leaderboard
4 UI-Genie-Agent 41.2% screenshot + xml Official leaderboard
5 V-Droid (Llama8B) 38.3% xml Official leaderboard
6 AutoGLM-2024-10 36.2% screenshot + xml Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o Nov 2024 31.2% screenshot Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
8 LLaMA3.1-8B(ft) 23.9% xml Official leaderboard
9 GLM4-9B(ft) 21% xml Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 18.8% xml Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2024
GPT-4o 31.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o Gemini 1.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o Gemini 1.5 Pro

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%