Benchmark Almanac

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1

Grok 4.6 61.0 leads since Aug 2026 In use

Version 4.1 of Artificial Analysis's index, which moved to GDPval-AA v2, Terminal-Bench 2.1 and τ³-Banking and put the most weight on agents.

In use from June to September 2026, with 4.1.1 (August 2026) changing the τ³-Banking dataset and the graders for HLE, AA-LCR and AA-Omniscience. Components: GDPval-AA v2, τ³-Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience (accuracy 8%, non-hallucination 4%), Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond and CritPt. Weights: Agents 34%, Coding 24%, Scientific Reasoning 24%, General 18%. IFBench left the index.

Made by Artificial Analysis Released Jun 2026 Composite indices Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
7
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Grok 4.6 leads with 61.0 among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Grok 4.6 61.0
  2. 2 GPT-5.6 Sol 58.9
  3. 3 Kimi K3 57.1
  4. 4 Gemini 3.7 Flash 56.0
  5. 5 GPT-5.6 Terra 55.0
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2
  7. 7 Inkling-Small 40.0
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Grok 4.6 61.0 Aug 2026 Model card
2 GPT-5.6 Sol 58.9 Jul 2026 Model card
3 Kimi K3 57.1 Jul 2026 Model card
4 Gemini 3.7 Flash 56.0 Aug 2026 Model card
5 GPT-5.6 Terra 55.0 Jul 2026 Model card
6 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2 Jul 2026 Model card
7 Inkling-Small 40.0 Jul 2026 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI xAI
Lab claims Replaced by 4.2, Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 61.0

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
40 45 50 55 60 65 40 45 50 55 60 65

4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Thinking Machines
xAI
Google DeepMind
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash 56 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
12 Aug 2026 Grok 4.6 61 AA Intelligence Index
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small 40 AA Index v4.1
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra 55 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol 58.9 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 (Sol, max)

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash model card 56 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (results table, p.5) Capabilities
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small model card 40 AA Index v4.1 (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 57.1 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1, rank 4 of 580 (Table 5) Other

Versions

More in Other

All 41 in Other
  • Personal Superintelligence Index (Meta) In use Meta's composite of seven personal and knowledge-work evals: Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, FocusBench, JobBench, GDP.pdf, VBT and DRACO.
  • Anthropic ECI (AECI) Only in system cards Index that combines a basket of capability benchmarks into one capability score to track trends across Anthropic models. Claude Opus 5.5 169.4
  • Qwen in-house English automatic evaluation Only in system cards Models answer Qwen in-house English datasets on knowledge, comprehension, coding, math and related skills. Skills and weights change between reports. Qwen2-72B 72.9%
  • Recognition of model-written user turns (Anthropic) Only in system cards Models write synthetic user turns for real Claude Code transcripts, then judge which version is real. Score is accuracy above chance. Claude Mythos Preview 0.35
  • LiveBench Dropped Models answer monthly refreshed questions across math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis. Scored automatically against objective ground truth. Claude Fable 5.1 85.7%
  • PhiBench Dropped Models answer original prompts that Microsoft's Phi team wrote to test a wide range of skills and reasoning. Phi-4-Reasoning-plus 74.2%