Benchmark Almanac

PhiBench

Phi-4-Reasoning-plus 74.2% leads since Apr 2025 Dropped

Models answer original prompts that Microsoft's Phi team wrote to test a wide range of skills and reasoning.

In-house: Microsoft never released the tasks, and the Phi-4-reasoning report uses a newer version, PhiBench 2.21.

Made by Microsoft Released Dec 2024 Other Tasks kept private Last in a launch post Apr 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Apr 2025
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Phi-4-Reasoning-plus leads with 74.2% among models released by Apr 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Phi-4-Reasoning-plus 74.2%
  2. 2 Phi-4-reasoning 70.6%
  3. 3 Phi-4 56.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-4-Reasoning-plus 74.2% Apr 2025 Model card
2 Phi-4-reasoning 70.6% Apr 2025 Model card
3 Phi-4 56.2% Dec 2024 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-4-Reasoning-plus Phi-4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-4-Reasoning-plus Phi-4

No launch post has listed it since Apr 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
30 Apr 2025 Phi-4-reasoning 70.6 PhiBench 2.21
30 Apr 2025 Phi-4-Reasoning-plus 74.2 PhiBench 2.21
12 Dec 2024 Phi-4 56.2 PhiBench (internal)

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Apr 2025 Phi-4-reasoning technical report 70.6 PhiBench 2.21 (Table 2) Capabilities
30 Apr 2025 Phi-4-Reasoning-plus technical report 74.2 PhiBench 2.21 (Table 2) Capabilities
12 Dec 2024 Phi-4 technical report 56.2 PhiBench (internal) (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Other

All 41 in Other
  • Personal Superintelligence Index (Meta) In use Meta's composite of seven personal and knowledge-work evals: Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, FocusBench, JobBench, GDP.pdf, VBT and DRACO.
  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 In use Version 5 of Artificial Analysis's index: nine evaluations in four equal categories, most with private test sets, run three times each in its own agent harness. Gemini 4 Carbon 59.0
  • Anthropic ECI (AECI) Only in system cards Index that combines a basket of capability benchmarks into one capability score to track trends across Anthropic models. Claude Opus 5.5 169.4
  • Qwen in-house English automatic evaluation Only in system cards Models answer Qwen in-house English datasets on knowledge, comprehension, coding, math and related skills. Skills and weights change between reports. Qwen2-72B 72.9%
  • Recognition of model-written user turns (Anthropic) Only in system cards Models write synthetic user turns for real Claude Code transcripts, then judge which version is real. Score is accuracy above chance. Claude Mythos Preview 0.35
  • LiveBench Dropped Models answer monthly refreshed questions across math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis. Scored automatically against objective ground truth. Claude Fable 5.1 85.7%