Benchmark Almanac

XCOPA

PaLM 2-L 94.4% Dropped

Models pick the more plausible cause or effect of a premise from two options, in 11 languages. Scoring is accuracy.

In the authors’ words

In order to simulate human language capacity, natural language processing systems must be able to reason about the dynamics of everyday situations, including their possible causes and effects. Moreover, they should be able to generalise the acquired world knowledge to new languages, modulo cultural differences. Advances in machine reasoning and cross-lingual transfer depend on the availability of challenging evaluation benchmarks. Motivated by both demands, we introduce Cross-lingual Choice of Plausible Alternatives (XCOPA), a typologically diverse multilingual dataset for causal commonsense reasoning in 11 languages, which includes resource-poor languages like Eastern Apurímac Quechua and Haitian Creole. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models on this novel dataset, revealing that the performance of current methods based on multilingual pretraining and zero-shot fine-tuning falls short compared to translation-based transfer. Finally, we propose strategies to adapt multilingual models to out-of-sample resource-lean languages where only a small corpus or a bilingual dictionary is available, and report substantial improvements over the random baseline. The XCOPA dataset is freely available at github.com/cambridgeltl/xcopa.

Abstract of XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoning (arXiv:2005.00333, CC0)
Made by Cambridge Language Technology Lab (Ponti et al.) Released May 2020 Reasoning in many languages All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2025 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs

PaLM 2-L leads with 94.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 PaLM 2-L 94.4%
  2. 2 Apertus 70B 69.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 PaLM 2-L 94.4% May 2023 Model card
2 Apertus 70B 69.8% Sep 2025 Model card

The best score passed 85% in May 2023

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) PaLM 2-L 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) PaLM 2-L

Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Swiss AI Initiative
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
2 Sep 2025 Apertus 70B 69.8 XCOPA (pretraining evaluation)
10 May 2023 PaLM 2-L 94.4 XCOPA (4)

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%