Benchmark Almanac

VisualWebBench

Seed1.5-VL 87.3% leads since May 2025 Dropped

Models answer questions about web page screenshots across seven tasks, such as captioning, OCR, element grounding and action prediction.

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce \bench, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. \bench consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on \bench, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe \bench will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.

Abstract of VisualWebBench: How Far Have Multimodal LLMs Evolved in Web Page Understanding and Grounding? (arXiv:2404.05955, CC0)
Made by Junpeng Liu , Yifan Song et al. Released Apr 2024 Finding things on screen All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2025 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Oct 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Seed1.5-VL leads with 87.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed1.5-VL 87.3%
  2. 2 LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.5-VL 87.3% May 2025 Model card
2 LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7% Oct 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2025, by Seed1.5-VL
Seed1.5-VL 87.3%

The best score passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL

Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7 VisualWebBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 87.3 VisualWebBench

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 78.7 VisualWebBench (Table 5) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 87.3 VisualWebBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 88.0 Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%