CaseLaw v2
Models answer private questions over recent Canadian court decisions, such as finding key cases and answering across several documents.
Replaced the original CaseLaw benchmark after models neared 90% on it. Updated 2026-03-02 and archived as saturated, last run 2026-05-04 with 54 models.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Grok 4.3 leads with 79.3% among models released by Apr 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 15 more
- 79.3 Grok 4.3
- 73.4 GPT-5.1
- 69.9 GPT-4.1
- 68.5 GPT-5 mini
- 68.4 Claude Opus 4.7
- 66.5 GPT-5
- 66.2 GPT-5.5
- 66.0 GPT-5.2
- 65.8 Grok 4
- 65.7 Grok 4 Fast
- 65.7 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 64.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 64.5
Cohere Command A
- 64.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 63.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 63.8 GPT-5.4
- 63.1
Muse Spark
- 62.6 Claude Opus 4.5
- 62.2 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 62.1 Claude Opus 4.6
- 61.4
Mistral Large 3
- 61.2 Kimi K2.6
- 60.9
MiniMax-M2.7
- 60.5 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 59.7 GPT-4o
- 59.7
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)
- 59.4
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 58.7 Kimi K2.5
- 57.9
Trinity Large Thinking
- 56.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 56.0
Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)
- 55.8
Gemini 3 Flash
- 55.8
MiniMax-M2.1
- 55.4
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 55.0
Qwen3-Max
- 55.0
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 54.9 GLM-4.7
- 54.5 Grok 4.20
- 53.9
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 53.5
MiniMax-M2.5
- 53.2
Qwen3.6 27B
- 53.0
Gemini 3 Pro
- 52.6 GPT-5 nano
- 52.6
Gemma 4 31B IT
- 52.5 GLM-5
- 51.9 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 51.7 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 51.5 GLM-5.1
- 51.5
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 48.8 gpt-oss-120b
- 47.9
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
- 44.2
Mistral Medium 3.5
- 43.8 gpt-oss-20b
- 1 Grok 4.3 79.3%
- 2 GPT-5.1 73.4%
- 3 GPT-4.1 69.9%
- 4 GPT-5 mini 68.5%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.7 68.4%
- 6 GPT-5 66.5%
- 7 GPT-5.5 66.2%
- 8 GPT-5.2 66%
- 9 Grok 4 65.8%
- 10 Grok 4 Fast 65.7%
- 11 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7%
- 12
Gemini 3.1 Pro 64.8%
- 13
Cohere Command A 64.5%
- 14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 64%
- 15
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 63.9%
- 16 GPT-5.4 xhigh 63.8%
- 17
Muse Spark 63.1%
- 18 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 62.6%
- 19 Claude Sonnet 4.5 thinking 62.2%
- 20 Claude Opus 4.6 thinking 62.1%
- 21
Mistral Large 3 61.4%
- 22 Kimi K2.6 61.2%
- 23
MiniMax-M2.7 60.9%
- 24 Grok 4.1 Fast 60.5%
- 25 GPT-4o Aug 2024 59.7%
- 26
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) thinking 59.7%
- 27
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 59.4%
- 28 Kimi K2.5 thinking 58.7%
- 29
Trinity Large Thinking 57.9%
- 30 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 56.5%
- 31
Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B) 56%
- 32
Gemini 3 Flash 55.8%
- 33
MiniMax-M2.1 55.8%
- 34
DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 55.4%
- 35
Qwen3-Max 55%
- 36
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 55%
- 37 GLM-4.7 54.9%
- 38 Grok 4.20 54.5%
- 39
DeepSeek-V3.1 53.9%
- 40
MiniMax-M2.5 53.5%
- 41
Qwen3.6 27B 53.2%
- 42
Gemini 3 Pro 53%
- 43 GPT-5 nano 52.6%
- 44
Gemma 4 31B IT 52.6%
- 45 GLM-5 thinking 52.5%
- 46 GPT-5.4 Nano 51.9%
- 47 GPT-5.4 Mini 51.7%
- 48 GLM-5.1 51.5%
- 49
Qwen 3.6 Plus 51.5%
- 50 gpt-oss-120b 48.8%
- 51
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 47.9%
- 52
Mistral Medium 3.5 44.2%
- 53 gpt-oss-20b 43.8%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4.3 | 79.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 | 73.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-4.1 | 69.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5 mini | 68.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 68.4% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-5 | 66.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-5.5 | 66.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-5.2 | 66% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Grok 4 | 65.8% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Grok 4 Fast | 65.7% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 65.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 64.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 64.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 64% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 63.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-5.4 | 63.8% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 63.1% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 62.6% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 62.2% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 62.1% | thinking | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 61.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Kimi K2.6 | 61.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 60.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 60.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 59.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 59.7% | thinking | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 59.4% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Kimi K2.5 | 58.7% | thinking | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 57.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 56.5% | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 56% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 55.8% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 55.8% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 55.4% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | | 55% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 55% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | GLM-4.7 | 54.9% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | Grok 4.20 | 54.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 53.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 53.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 53.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 53% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | GPT-5 nano | 52.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 52.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GLM-5 | 52.5% | thinking | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 51.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 51.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GLM-5.1 | 51.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 51.5% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | gpt-oss-120b | 48.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 47.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 44.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | gpt-oss-20b | 43.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%