Benchmark Almanac

UniGenBench

Only in system cards

Text-to-image models draw images for 600 prompts across 5 themes and 20 subthemes, in English and Chinese and in short and long forms. A multimodal model judge checks each image on 10 primary and 27 secondary semantic dimensions, such as attributes, actions, relationships, layout, text and logical reasoning.

It first appeared with the Pref-GRPO paper (arXiv 2508.20751), and UniGenBench++ (arXiv 2510.18701) extended it. Separate leaderboards cover English, Chinese and long prompts. The team also releases an offline judge model based on a 72B Qwen model, so scores from the two judges may differ. 68 HF paper upvotes and about 140 GitHub stars.

Released
August 2025
Kind
Image generation and editing
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
May 2026
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent progress in text-to-image (T2I) generation underscores the importance of reliable benchmarks in evaluating how accurately generated images reflect the semantics of their textual prompt. However, (1) existing benchmarks lack the diversity of prompt scenarios and multilingual support, both essential for real-world applicability; (2) they offer only coarse evaluations across primary dimensions, covering a narrow range of sub-dimensions, and fall short in fine-grained sub-dimension assessment. To address these limitations, we introduce UniGenBench++, a unified semantic assessment benchmark for T2I generation. Specifically, it comprises 600 prompts organized hierarchically to ensure both coverage and efficiency: (1) spans across diverse real-world scenarios, i.e., 5 main prompt themes and 20 subthemes; (2) comprehensively probes T2I models' semantic consistency over 10 primary and 27 sub evaluation criteria, with each prompt assessing multiple testpoints. To rigorously assess model robustness to variations in language and prompt length, we provide both English and Chinese versions of each prompt in short and long forms. Leveraging the general world knowledge and fine-grained image understanding capabilities of a closed-source Multi-modal Large Language Model (MLLM), i.e., Gemini-2.5-Pro, an effective pipeline is developed for reliable benchmark construction and streamlined model assessment. Moreover, to further facilitate community use, we train a robust evaluation model that enables offline assessment of T2I model outputs. Through comprehensive benchmarking of both open- and closed-sourced T2I models, we systematically reveal their strengths and weaknesses across various aspects.

Abstract of UniGenBench++: A Unified Semantic Evaluation Benchmark for Text-to-Image Generation (arXiv:2510.18701, CC0)
63
Entries on its own leaderboard, 16 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-Image-1.5 leads with 95.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 GPT-Image-1.5 95.8%
  2. 2 Nano Banana Pro 92.7%
  3. 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 92.5%
  4. 4 Imagen-4.0-Ultra-preview-06-06 91.7%
  5. 5 FLUX.2 [max] 90.8%
  6. 6 Seedream-4-5-251128 89.7%
  7. 7 FLUX.2 [flex] 89.3%
  8. 8 FLUX.2 [pro] 88.3%
  9. 9 Seedream 4.0 87.3%
  10. 10 Nano Banana 87.3%
  11. 11 Imagen-4.0-generate-preview-06-06 85.8%
  12. 12 FLUX.2 [dev] 84.8%
  13. 13 FLUX-kontext-max 80%
  14. 14 FLUX.2-klein-base-9b 79.3%
  15. 15 Seedream 3.0 78.4%
  16. 16 Qwen-Image 78.4%
  17. 17 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 78.3%
  18. 18 Z-Image 78.1%
  19. 19 wan2.5-t2i-preview 77.9%
  20. 20 Imagen-4.0-Fast-preview-06-06 77.7%
  21. 21 FLUX-kontext-pro 75.8%
  22. 22 Hunyuan-Image-2.1 74.6%
  23. 23 LongCat-Image 73.5%
  24. 24 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B 72.3%
  25. 25 Z-Image-Turbo 71.4%
  26. 26 HiDream-I1-Full 71.4%
  27. 27 Imagen 3 (generate-002) 71.3%
  28. 28 Lumina-DiMOO 71.1%
  29. 29 FLUX-pro-1.1-Ultra 70.5%
  30. 30 FLUX.1-Krea-dev 69.9%
  31. 31 FLUX.2-klein-base-4b 69.8%
  32. 32 Runway-Gen4-Image 69.8%
  33. 33 Echo-4o 69.1%
  34. 34 DALL-E 3 68.8%
  35. 35 Pref-GRPO 68.4%
  36. 36 GLM-Image 67.2%
  37. 37 Keling-Ketu 65.2%
  38. 38 BLIP3-o-Next 65.2%
  39. 39 wan2.2-t2i-plus 64.8%
  40. 40 UniWorld-V1 63.1%
  41. 41 OmniGen2 63.1%
  42. 42 SD-3.5-Large 62.9%
  43. 43 Recraft 62.6%
  44. 44 Stability-AI-stable-image-ultra 62%
  45. 45 Show-o2 61.9%
  46. 46 HiDream_v2L 61.6%
  47. 47 Janus-Pro 61.4%
  48. 48 FLUX.1 [dev] 61%
  49. 49 SD-3.5-Medium 60.7%
  50. 50 BAGEL 59.9%
  51. 51 Infinity 59.8%
  52. 52 BLIP3-o 59.6%
  53. 53 OneCAT 58.3%
  54. 54 CogView4 56%
  55. 55 X-Omni 53.8%
  56. 56 Janus 51.6%
  57. 57 Hunyuan-DiT 51.4%
  58. 58 Janus-flow 47.1%
  59. 59 Kolors 46.1%
  60. 60 Playground2.5 46%
  61. 61 Emu3 45.4%
  62. 62 MMaDA 41.4%
  63. 63 SDXL 40.2%

Source: Official UniGenBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-Image-1.5 95.8% Official leaderboard
2 Nano Banana Pro 92.7% Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 92.5% Official leaderboard
4 Imagen-4.0-Ultra-preview-06-06 91.7% Official leaderboard
5 FLUX.2 [max] 90.8% Official leaderboard
6 Seedream-4-5-251128 89.7% Official leaderboard
7 FLUX.2 [flex] 89.3% Official leaderboard
8 FLUX.2 [pro] 88.3% Official leaderboard
9 Seedream 4.0 87.3% Official leaderboard
10 Nano Banana 87.3% Official leaderboard
11 Imagen-4.0-generate-preview-06-06 85.8% Official leaderboard
12 FLUX.2 [dev] 84.8% Official leaderboard
13 FLUX-kontext-max 80% Official leaderboard
14 FLUX.2-klein-base-9b 79.3% Official leaderboard
15 Seedream 3.0 78.4% Official leaderboard
16 Qwen-Image 78.4% Official leaderboard
17 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 78.3% Official leaderboard
18 Z-Image 78.1% Official leaderboard
19 wan2.5-t2i-preview 77.9% Official leaderboard
20 Imagen-4.0-Fast-preview-06-06 77.7% Official leaderboard
21 FLUX-kontext-pro 75.8% Official leaderboard
22 Hunyuan-Image-2.1 74.6% Official leaderboard
23 LongCat-Image 73.5% Official leaderboard
24 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B 72.3% Official leaderboard
25 Z-Image-Turbo 71.4% Official leaderboard
26 HiDream-I1-Full 71.4% Official leaderboard
27 Imagen 3 (generate-002) 71.3% Official leaderboard
28 Lumina-DiMOO 71.1% Official leaderboard
29 FLUX-pro-1.1-Ultra 70.5% Official leaderboard
30 FLUX.1-Krea-dev 69.9% Official leaderboard
31 FLUX.2-klein-base-4b 69.8% Official leaderboard
32 Runway-Gen4-Image 69.8% Official leaderboard
33 Echo-4o 69.1% Official leaderboard
34 DALL-E 3 68.8% Official leaderboard
35 Pref-GRPO 68.4% Official leaderboard
36 GLM-Image 67.2% Official leaderboard
37 Keling-Ketu 65.2% Official leaderboard
38 BLIP3-o-Next 65.2% Official leaderboard
39 wan2.2-t2i-plus 64.8% Official leaderboard
40 UniWorld-V1 63.1% Official leaderboard
41 OmniGen2 63.1% Official leaderboard
42 SD-3.5-Large 62.9% Official leaderboard
43 Recraft 62.6% Official leaderboard
44 Stability-AI-stable-image-ultra 62% Official leaderboard
45 Show-o2 61.9% Official leaderboard
46 HiDream_v2L 61.6% Official leaderboard
47 Janus-Pro 61.4% Official leaderboard
48 FLUX.1 [dev] 61% Official leaderboard
49 SD-3.5-Medium 60.7% Official leaderboard
50 BAGEL 59.9% Official leaderboard
51 Infinity 59.8% Official leaderboard
52 BLIP3-o 59.6% Official leaderboard
53 OneCAT 58.3% Official leaderboard
54 CogView4 56% Official leaderboard
55 X-Omni 53.8% Official leaderboard
56 Janus 51.6% Official leaderboard
57 Hunyuan-DiT 51.4% Official leaderboard
58 Janus-flow 47.1% Official leaderboard
59 Kolors 46.1% Official leaderboard
60 Playground2.5 46% Official leaderboard
61 Emu3 45.4% Official leaderboard
62 MMaDA 41.4% Official leaderboard
63 SDXL 40.2% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

No dated values yet.

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 84.6 Cosmos3-Nano text-to-image UniGenBench All (1170), Table 11 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%