Benchmark Almanac

TextEdit Real

Nano Banana Pro 0.91 tops its leaderboard GPT-Image-1.5 0.90 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models edit text in real images in the full TextEdit test set. The score is the published judged average.

One track of TextEdit. The TextEdit record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.

Released
March 2026
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
7
Entries on its own leaderboard, 3 models we track

Nano Banana Pro tops the leaderboard with 0.91

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-1.5, at 0.90.

  1. 0.91 Nano Banana Pro
  2. 0.90 GPT-Image-1.5
  3. 0.88 InternVL-U
  4. 0.77 Qwen-Image-Edit
  5. 0.53 BAGEL
  6. 0.18 Ovis-U1
  7. 0.09 Lumina-DiMOO
  1. 1 Nano Banana Pro 0.91
  2. 2 GPT-Image-1.5 0.90
  3. 3 InternVL-U 0.88
  4. 4 Qwen-Image-Edit 0.77
  5. 5 BAGEL 0.53
  6. 6 Ovis-U1 0.18
  7. 7 Lumina-DiMOO 0.09

Source: Official TextEdit Real leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nano Banana Pro 0.91 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-Image-1.5 0.90 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL-U 0.88 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen-Image-Edit 0.77 Official leaderboard
5 BAGEL 0.53 Official leaderboard
6 Ovis-U1 0.18 Official leaderboard
7 Lumina-DiMOO 0.09 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

No dated values yet.

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%