SWE-Marathon v1.1
Agents complete 20 multi-hour software tasks such as library rebuilds, product clones and ML work. Hidden tests, parity checks and integrity checks grade each run, scored over 8 trials.
The maker keeps v1.0 scores on an archive board. v1.1 moved the post-training task to H100 GPUs and raised trials from 5 to 8.
In the authors’ words
AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments. Yet current agent benchmarks largely evaluate short-form tasks, such as single pull requests, small tickets, or 5-10 minute exercises, limiting our ability to measure agents' capabilities in planning, long-context understanding, and memory use. We introduce SWE-Marathon, a benchmark of 20 long-horizon tasks spanning software engineering and adjacent technical domains. Each task consists of a unique executable environment, a human-written reference solution, and a multi-layer verification suite. Logged agent attempts average 27.2M total tokens, making SWE-Marathon substantially longer-horizon than existing SWE and command-line agent benchmarks. Current frontier coding agents solve fewer than 30% of tasks. Failures often arise from poor self-verification, self-reported infeasibility, and premature termination. We also observe reward-hacking behavior in 13.8% of rollouts, where agents attempt to exploit the environment or verifier to bypass the intended workflow. SWE-Marathon includes adversarial review of test suites and execution environments, as well as multi-layer checks designed to prevent shortcut solutions. We release SWE-Marathon, evaluation code, and agent trajectories at https://swe-marathon.org/.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
Muse Wonder Full leads with 53.1%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
- 53.1
Muse Wonder Full
- 52.5
Muse Wonder
- 51.3 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 50.0 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 48.1 Kimi K3
- 46.3
Muse Spark 1.3
- 46.3 Claude Opus 5.5
- 45.6 Claude Fable 5.1
- 45.6 Grok 4.7
- 43.8
Gemini 4 Argon
- 42.5 GLM-5.3
- 42.5 GPT-6 Astra
- 42.5 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 38.8 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 28.1 GPT-6 Luna
- 22.5
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 10.6
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 1
Muse Wonder Full max 53.1%
- 2
Muse Wonder max 52.5%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 51.3%
- 4 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 50%
- 5 Kimi K3 48.1%
- 6
Muse Spark 1.3 max 46.3%
- 7 Claude Opus 5.5 max 46.3%
- 8 Claude Fable 5.1 max 45.6%
- 9 Grok 4.7 high 45.6%
- 10
Gemini 4 Argon high 43.8%
- 11 GLM-5.3 max 42.5%
- 12 GPT-6 Astra max 42.5%
- 13 GPT-6.1 Sol max 42.5%
- 14 GLM-5.3-Flash max 38.8%
- 15 GPT-6 Luna max 28.1%
- 16
Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5%
- 17
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10.6%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 53.1% | max, Muse Code | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 52.5% | max, Muse Code | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 51.3% | max, Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 50% | max, Claude Code | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi K3 | 48.1% | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 46.3% | max, Muse Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 46.3% | max, Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 45.6% | max, Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Grok 4.7 | 45.6% | high, Grok Build | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 43.8% | high, Gemini CLI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GLM-5.3 | 42.5% | max, Claude Code | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-6 Astra | 42.5% | max, Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 42.5% | max, Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 38.8% | max, Claude Code | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-6 Luna | 28.1% | max, Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 22.5% | OpenCode | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 10.6% | Mini-SWE-Agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Of runs with a cost, the best scores 51.3% for $169 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Muse Spark 1.3 at max comes within 5 points of the best for $14 a task, 12 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | max | Muse Code | 53.1% | ||
| | max | Muse Code | 52.5% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | max | Claude Code | 51.3% | $169 | |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | max | Claude Code | 50% | $22 | |
| Kimi K3 | Claude Code | 48.1% | $661 | ||
| | max | Muse Code | 46.3% | $14 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | max | Claude Code | 46.3% | $164 | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | max | Claude Code | 45.6% | $63 | |
| Grok 4.7 | high | Grok Build | 45.6% | ||
| | high | Gemini CLI | 43.8% | $10 | |
| GLM-5.3 | max | Claude Code | 42.5% | $59 | |
| GPT-6 Astra | max | Codex | 42.5% | $52 | |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | max | Codex | 42.5% | $7.90 | |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | max | Claude Code | 38.8% | $2.46 | |
| GPT-6 Luna | max | Codex | 28.1% | $0.84 | |
| | OpenCode | 22.5% | $11 | ||
| | Mini-SWE-Agent | 10.6% |
4 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471