Benchmark Almanac

SWE-Marathon v1.1

Muse Wonder Full 53.1% leads since Oct 2026 Not in model cards

Agents complete 20 multi-hour software tasks such as library rebuilds, product clones and ML work. Hidden tests, parity checks and integrity checks grade each run, scored over 8 trials.

The maker keeps v1.0 scores on an archive board. v1.1 moved the post-training task to H100 GPUs and raised trials from 5 to 8.

In the authors’ words

AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments. Yet current agent benchmarks largely evaluate short-form tasks, such as single pull requests, small tickets, or 5-10 minute exercises, limiting our ability to measure agents' capabilities in planning, long-context understanding, and memory use. We introduce SWE-Marathon, a benchmark of 20 long-horizon tasks spanning software engineering and adjacent technical domains. Each task consists of a unique executable environment, a human-written reference solution, and a multi-layer verification suite. Logged agent attempts average 27.2M total tokens, making SWE-Marathon substantially longer-horizon than existing SWE and command-line agent benchmarks. Current frontier coding agents solve fewer than 30% of tasks. Failures often arise from poor self-verification, self-reported infeasibility, and premature termination. We also observe reward-hacking behavior in 13.8% of rollouts, where agents attempt to exploit the environment or verifier to bypass the intended workflow. SWE-Marathon includes adversarial review of test suites and execution environments, as well as multi-layer checks designed to prevent shortcut solutions. We release SWE-Marathon, evaluation code, and agent trajectories at https://swe-marathon.org/.

Abstract of SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work? (arXiv:2606.07682, CC0)
Made by Abundant AI Released Jul 2026 Building whole projects All tasks public Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
17
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Muse Wonder Full leads with 53.1%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

  1. 1 Muse Wonder Full max 53.1%
  2. 2 Muse Wonder max 52.5%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 51.3%
  4. 4 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 50%
  5. 5 Kimi K3 48.1%
  6. 6 Muse Spark 1.3 max 46.3%
  7. 7 Claude Opus 5.5 max 46.3%
  8. 8 Claude Fable 5.1 max 45.6%
  9. 9 Grok 4.7 high 45.6%
  10. 10 Gemini 4 Argon high 43.8%
  11. 11 GLM-5.3 max 42.5%
  12. 12 GPT-6 Astra max 42.5%
  13. 13 GPT-6.1 Sol max 42.5%
  14. 14 GLM-5.3-Flash max 38.8%
  15. 15 GPT-6 Luna max 28.1%
  16. 16 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5%
  17. 17 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Wonder Full 53.1% max, Muse Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Muse Wonder 52.5% max, Muse Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 51.3% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Haiku 5.5 50% max, Claude Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K3 48.1% Claude Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Muse Spark 1.3 46.3% max, Muse Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Opus 5.5 46.3% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Fable 5.1 45.6% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Grok 4.7 45.6% high, Grok Build Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 4 Argon 43.8% high, Gemini CLI Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GLM-5.3 42.5% max, Claude Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-6 Astra 42.5% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-6.1 Sol 42.5% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-5.3-Flash 38.8% max, Claude Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-6 Luna 28.1% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5% OpenCode Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
17 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10.6% Mini-SWE-Agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard

Of runs with a cost, the best scores 51.3% for $169 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Muse Spark 1.3 at max comes within 5 points of the best for $14 a task, 12 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Z.ai Meta OpenAI Anthropic Google DeepMind Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 20% 40% 60% $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 $1,000 Cost per task, log scale Claude Sonnet 5.5, max Claude Haiku 5.5, max Muse Spark 1.3, max Gemini 4 Argon, high GLM-5.3-Flash, max GPT-6 Luna, max 0% 20% 40% 60% $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 $1,000 Cost per task, log scale Claude Sonnet 5.5, max Muse Spark 1.3, max
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Muse Wonder Full max Muse Code 53.1%
Muse Wonder max Muse Code 52.5%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max Claude Code 51.3% $169
Claude Haiku 5.5 max Claude Code 50% $22
Kimi K3 Claude Code 48.1% $661
Muse Spark 1.3 max Muse Code 46.3% $14
Claude Opus 5.5 max Claude Code 46.3% $164
Claude Fable 5.1 max Claude Code 45.6% $63
Grok 4.7 high Grok Build 45.6%
Gemini 4 Argon high Gemini CLI 43.8% $10
GLM-5.3 max Claude Code 42.5% $59
GPT-6 Astra max Codex 42.5% $52
GPT-6.1 Sol max Codex 42.5% $7.90
GLM-5.3-Flash max Claude Code 38.8% $2.46
GPT-6 Luna max Codex 28.1% $0.84
Gemini 3.7 Flash OpenCode 22.5% $11
DeepSeek-V4-Pro Mini-SWE-Agent 10.6%

4 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek Moonshot AI Anthropic Meta
Own leaderboard 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Wonder Full Kimi K3 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Wonder Full DeepSeek-V4-Pro

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic xAI Moonshot AI Z.ai StepFun DeepSeek Meta
SWE-Marathon v1.1 9 leaders
SWE-Marathon 5 leaders
SWE-Marathon v1.1 4 leaders

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471