Benchmark Almanac

SQuAD

Llama 3.1-405B 89.3% leads since Jul 2024 Dropped

Models extract answer spans from Wikipedia paragraphs for over 100,000 crowdsourced questions. Scored by exact match and F1.

Saturated, with models above human performance since 2018. SQuAD 2.0 added unanswerable questions.

In the authors’ words

We present the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD), a new reading comprehension dataset consisting of 100,000+ questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to each question is a segment of text from the corresponding reading passage. We analyze the dataset to understand the types of reasoning required to answer the questions, leaning heavily on dependency and constituency trees. We build a strong logistic regression model, which achieves an F1 score of 51.0%, a significant improvement over a simple baseline (20%). However, human performance (86.8%) is much higher, indicating that the dataset presents a good challenge problem for future research. The dataset is freely available at https://stanford-qa.com

Abstract of SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text (arXiv:1606.05250, CC0)
Made by Stanford NLP Released Jun 2016 Reading comprehension Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Apr 2024 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Jul 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
5
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
5
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Llama 3.1-405B leads with 89.3% among models released by Jul 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Llama 3.1-405B 89.3%
  2. 2 Llama 3-70B 85.6%
  3. 3 Llama 3.1-70B 81.8%
  4. 4 Llama 3.1-8B 77%
  5. 5 Llama 3-8B 76.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama 3.1-405B 89.3% Jul 2024 Model card
2 Llama 3-70B 85.6% Apr 2024 Model card
3 Llama 3.1-70B 81.8% Jul 2024 Model card
4 Llama 3.1-8B 77% Jul 2024 Model card
5 Llama 3-8B 76.4% Apr 2024 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta
Lab claims Passed 85% in Apr 2024, by Llama 3-70B

The best score passed 85% in Apr 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3.1-405B Llama 3-70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3.1-405B

Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-70B 85.6 SQuAD (1-shot) [pretrained]

5 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-8B model card 77 SQuAD, 1-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-70B model card 81.8 SQuAD, 1-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-405B model card 89.3 SQuAD, 1-shot, em, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-8B model card 76.4 SQuAD (1-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-70B model card 85.6 SQuAD (1-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities

Versions

More in Knowledge

All 109 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • BIG-Bench Extra Hard In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%