Benchmark Almanac

BIG-Bench Extra Hard

Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4% leads since Apr 2026 In use

Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies.

A mini version with 460 examples also exists, so check which one a model card reports.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in everyday applications, demanding robust general reasoning capabilities and diverse reasoning skillset. However, current LLM reasoning benchmarks predominantly focus on mathematical and coding abilities, leaving a gap in evaluating broader reasoning proficiencies. One particular exception is the BIG-Bench dataset, which has served as a crucial benchmark for evaluating the general reasoning capabilities of LLMs, thanks to its diverse set of challenging tasks that allowed for a comprehensive assessment of general reasoning across various skills within a unified framework. However, recent advances in LLMs have led to saturation on BIG-Bench, and its harder version BIG-Bench Hard (BBH). State-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores on many tasks in BBH, thus diminishing its utility. To address this limitation, we introduce BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH), a new benchmark designed to push the boundaries of LLM reasoning evaluation. BBEH replaces each task in BBH with a novel task that probes a similar reasoning capability but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. We evaluate various models on BBEH and observe a (harmonic) average accuracy of 9.8% for the best general-purpose model and 44.8% for the best reasoning-specialized model, indicating substantial room for improvement and highlighting the ongoing challenge of achieving robust general reasoning in LLMs. We release BBEH publicly at: https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh.

Abstract of BIG-Bench Extra Hard (arXiv:2502.19187, CC0)
Made by Google DeepMind Released Feb 2025 Language reasoning All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
11
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
10
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Gemma 4 31B IT leads with 74.4% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  2. 2 ERNIE 5.0 66.6%
  3. 3 Gemma 4 26B A4B 64.8%
  4. 4 Ring-1T 59.6%
  5. 5 Ling-2.6-1T 52.4%
  6. 6 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 47.6%
  7. 7 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 27.2%
  8. 8 Gemma 3 27B 19.3%
  9. 9 Gemma 3 12B 16.3%
  10. 10 Gemma 3 4B 11%
  11. 11 Gemma 3 1B 7.20%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4% Apr 2026 Model card
2 ERNIE 5.0 66.6% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Gemma 4 26B A4B 64.8% Apr 2026 Model card
4 Ring-1T 59.6% Oct 2025 Model card
5 Ling-2.6-1T 52.4% Jun 2026 Model card
6 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 47.6% Jun 2026 Model card
7 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 27.2% Sep 2026 Model card
8 Gemma 3 27B 19.3% Mar 2025 Model card
9 Gemma 3 12B 16.3% Mar 2025 Model card
10 Gemma 3 4B 11% Mar 2025 Model card
11 Gemma 3 1B 7.20% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 11 models. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Google DeepMind Ant Group Baidu
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025
o3-mini 54.2%
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 4 31B IT ERNIE 5.0 Ring-1T o3-mini DeepSeek-R1 Gemma 2 27B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 4 31B IT ERNIE 5.0

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Baidu
DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 27.2 BBEH (EM)
10 Jun 2026 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B 47.6 BigBench Extra Hard
2 Apr 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B 64.8 BigBench Extra Hard
2 Apr 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4 BigBench Extra Hard
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 66.6 BBEH
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 19.3 BIG-Bench Extra Hard 0-shot (IT)

10 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
31 Jul 2026 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B technical report 47.6 BigBench EH, TD, 40.0 no-think (Table 3) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT technical report 74.4 Big Bench Extra Hard micro avg, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B technical report 64.8 Big Bench Extra Hard micro avg, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
13 Jun 2026 Ling-2.6-1T technical report 52.4 bbeh, Pass@1 (Table 5) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 66.6 BBEH (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Oct 2025 Ring-1T technical report 59.6 BBEH (Table 1) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 11 BBEH, IT, 0-shot (Table 18) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 19.3 BBEH, IT, 0-shot (Table 18) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 1B technical report 7.2 BBEH, IT, 0-shot (Table 18) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 16.3 BBEH, IT, 0-shot (Table 18) Capabilities

Versions

More in Knowledge

All 109 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%
  • HLE-Diamond In use Models answer 1,000 cleaned expert questions from Humanity's Last Exam, 500 on reasoning and 500 on knowledge, closed book. Graded on exact answers. GPT-6 Astra 65.8%