Benchmark Almanac

SpreadsheetBench

MiniMax-M3 89.3% leads since Jun 2026 In use

Real spreadsheet manipulation questions from Excel forums. Output workbook is checked cell-by-cell against reference solutions.

Kimi K3 reports 'SpreadsheetBench 2'. We did not find a separate public repo for v2.

In the authors’ words

We introduce SpreadsheetBench, a challenging spreadsheet manipulation benchmark exclusively derived from real-world scenarios, designed to immerse current large language models (LLMs) in the actual workflow of spreadsheet users. Unlike existing benchmarks that rely on synthesized queries and simplified spreadsheet files, SpreadsheetBench is built from 912 real questions gathered from online Excel forums, which reflect the intricate needs of users. The associated spreadsheets from the forums contain a variety of tabular data such as multiple tables, non-standard relational tables, and abundant non-textual elements. Furthermore, we propose a more reliable evaluation metric akin to online judge platforms, where multiple spreadsheet files are created as test cases for each instruction, ensuring the evaluation of robust solutions capable of handling spreadsheets with varying values. Our comprehensive evaluation of various LLMs under both single-round and multi-round inference settings reveals a substantial gap between the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models and human performance, highlighting the benchmark's difficulty.

Abstract of SpreadsheetBench: Towards Challenging Real World Spreadsheet Manipulation (arXiv:2406.14991, CC0)
Made by Renmin University (RUCKBReasoning) Released Jun 2024 Documents and spreadsheets All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
6
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

MiniMax-M3 leads with 89.3% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MiniMax-M3 89.3%
  2. 2 Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  3. 3 Qwen3.7-Plus 86.3%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.5 64.3%
  5. 5 ChatGPT agent 45.5%
  6. 6 ERNIE 5.0 40.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M3 89.3% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.7-Max 87% May 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.7-Plus 86.3% Jun 2026 Model card
4 Claude Opus 4.5 64.3% Nov 2025 Model card
5 ChatGPT agent 45.5% Jul 2025 Model card
6 ERNIE 5.0 40.1% Feb 2026 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 14 entries, 2 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

4 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic Qwen MiniMax
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2026, by Qwen3.7-Max
MiniMax-M3 89.3%

The best score passed 85% in May 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 4.5 ChatGPT agent o3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 4.5

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Baidu
Qwen
MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 86.3 SpreadSheetBench-v1
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 89.3 SpreadSheetBench-v1
20 May 2026 Qwen3.7-Max 87 SpreadSheetBench-v1
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 40.1 SpreadSheetBench
17 Jul 2025 ChatGPT agent 45.5 SpreadsheetBench, OSX LibreOffice, with .xlsx access 45.5 (without 35.3)

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 40.1 SpreadSheetBench (Table 2) Capabilities
24 Nov 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 system card 64.3 SpreadsheetBench, full 912 problems, no extended thinking, avg of 5 trials (2.15) Capabilities

More in Economic work

All 91 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%