SpreadsheetBench 2
Agents complete 321 expert-annotated business spreadsheet workflows, such as financial modeling, debugging, and charting, in multi-sheet workbooks. Scoring is task accuracy.
In the authors’ words
Spreadsheets are widely used for business analysis, financial modeling, reporting, and decision-making. However, most existing spreadsheet benchmarks evaluate isolated operations such as single-formula generation or local cell edits, and therefore fail to capture end-to-end workflows in realistic business settings. We introduce SpreadsheetBench 2, a workflow-level benchmark for spreadsheet agents that covers three task categories: generation, debugging, and visualization. The benchmark is constructed from authentic business data, including financial reports and corporate filings, and is annotated and validated by domain experts. The benchmark contains 321 tasks; each instance averages 11.8 worksheets and requires 593.5 cell modifications, reflecting large multi-sheet workbooks with cross-sheet dependencies. We evaluate eight frontier large language models under a unified multi-turn agent scaffold, and additionally include several LLM-based spreadsheet products as complementary baselines. Results show that current systems remain far from reliable on real-world workflows: the best model achieves 34.89% overall task accuracy, and debugging accuracy is as low as 12.00%. Trajectory analysis and a failure taxonomy further indicate that insufficient spreadsheet inspection and incorrect target-cell selection are the dominant bottlenecks. Together, these findings position SpreadsheetBench 2 as a challenging testbed for advancing reliable spreadsheet automation. Project page: https://spreadsheetbench.github.io/
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
arito tops the leaderboard with 54.5%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.6, at 34.9%.
The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1 arito 54.5%
- 2 WPS AI 50.9%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 34.9%
- 4 Decide Agent 2.0 33.8%
- 5 GPT-5.2 26.8%
- 6
Gemini 3.1 Pro 23.7%
- 7 GLM-5 17.1%
- 8
DeepSeek-V3.2 15.6%
- 9 Kimi K2.5 14.6%
- 10
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 11.2%
- 11
MiniMax-M2.5 7.17%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | arito | 54.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | WPS AI | 50.9% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 34.9% | SWE-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Decide Agent 2.0 | 33.8% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 | 26.8% | SWE-agent | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 23.7% | SWE-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5 | 17.1% | SWE-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 15.6% | SWE-agent | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Kimi K2.5 | 14.6% | SWE-agent | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 11.2% | SWE-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 7.17% | SWE-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Sep 2026 | 29.4 | SpeadSheet v2 | |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 34.8 | SpreadsheetBench 2 |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 34.8 | SpreadsheetBench 2 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%