SpatialWorld Digital
Agents complete entertainment tasks in digital environments. The score is the published digital task success rate.
One track of SpatialWorld. The SpatialWorld record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.
- Made by
- Tsinghua University
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Spatial reasoning and counting
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Spatial reasoning is a foundational capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to perceive and operate within the physical world. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on passive evaluation (e.g., static VQA) or simulator-specific pipelines, failing to assess general interactive spatial understanding. We introduce SpatialWorld, a unified benchmark designed specifically for evaluating the interactive spatial understanding of multimodal agents in complex real-world tasks. Integrating eight heterogeneous simulation backends under a shared, simulator-agnostic protocol, SpatialWorld features 760 human-annotated tasks across diverse domains (e.g., household routines, travel, social collaboration). Agents must solve tasks under vision-only partial observability, actively gathering egocentric visual evidence and expressing decisions via a unified, text-based action interface native to MLLMs. For reliable evaluation, each task includes a human-validated initial state, a reference trajectory, and a terminal-state verifier. Evaluating 15 advanced agents reveals that robust spatial task solving remains challenging: the strongest model, GPT-5, achieves an average task success rate (TSR) of only 17.4%, while the leading open-source model, Qwen-3.5, reaches 14.1%. Further analysis exposes a clear mismatch between task success and execution efficiency, alongside substantial domain-specific performance variations. These bottlenecks in active exploration and long-horizon planning position SpatialWorld as a rigorous testbed for future spatial agents.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 39% among models released by March 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 39.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 38.1
Gemini 3 Flash
- 36.4 GPT-5
- 32.6 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 31.0 Kimi K2.5
- 28.3 Qwen3-VL-235B-Thinking
- 26.0
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 24.8 Doubao-2.0-Lite
- 14.5 GLM-4.5V
- 11.9 GPT-5.4
- 8.10 GLM-4.6V
- 7.90 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B
- 7.60
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 5.00 Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct
- 3.30 Kimi-VL-A3B
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 39%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 38.1%
- 3 GPT-5 36.4%
- 4 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 32.6%
- 5 Kimi K2.5 31%
- 6 Qwen3-VL-235B-Thinking 28.3%
- 7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 26%
- 8 Doubao-2.0-Lite 24.8%
- 9 GLM-4.5V 14.5%
- 10 GPT-5.4 11.9%
- 11 GLM-4.6V 8.10%
- 12 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 7.90%
- 13
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 7.60%
- 14 Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct 5.00%
- 15 Kimi-VL-A3B 3.30%
Source: Official SpatialWorld Digital leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 39% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 38.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 | 36.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 32.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | 31% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Qwen3-VL-235B-Thinking | 28.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 26% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Doubao-2.0-Lite | 24.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | GLM-4.5V | 14.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5.4 | 11.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GLM-4.6V | 8.10% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B | 7.90% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 7.60% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct | 5.00% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Kimi-VL-A3B | 3.30% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official SpatialWorld Digital leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official SpatialWorld Digital leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%