Benchmark Almanac

SMDD-Bench

GPT-5.4 40.2% leads since May 2026 Not in model cards

502 small-molecule drug-design tasks in 5 types. Agent uses a fixed toolkit to produce a molecule that must pass all task criteria.

502 tasks per run in five types: 2D pharmacophore identification, interaction point discovery, scaffold hopping, lead optimization and fragment assembly. Agents get a Python sandbox, the Boltz structure predictor and an ADMET predictor. A separate diversity board resamples 20 lead-optimization tasks with 10 rollouts each. The board reports cost and time per task.

In the authors’ words

LLM agents have incredible potential for scientific discovery applications. However, the performance of LLM agents on real-world, small molecule drug design (SMDD) tasks across diverse chemistries and targets is unclear. Current evaluation methods are either ad hoc, too simple for real-world discovery, limited in scale, or restricted to single-turn question answering. In effort to standardize the evaluation of LLM agents on small molecule design, we introduce SMDD-Bench, a challenging, multi-turn, long-horizon agentic benchmark consisting of 502 guaranteed-solvable task instances spanning 5 task types: 2D Pharmacophore Identification, Interaction Point Discovery, Scaffold Hopping, Lead Optimization, and Fragment Assembly. SMDD-Bench tasks span a wide region of chemical space and involve 102 unique protein targets. Completely solving the benchmark would require having strong chemical and biological reasoning and 3D intuition, understanding specialized tool use, and displaying planning expertise over a limited number of oracle calls. We benchmark 7 frontier open and closed source LLMs and find even the most performant LLM, GPT5.4, solves only 40.2% of tasks. We hope SMDD-Bench provides a standardized testbed to invigorate the field towards training and evaluating LLM agents for fully autonomous computational drug design. We host a public leaderboard at smddbench.com .

Abstract of SMDD-Bench: Can LLMs Solve Real-World Small Molecule Drug Design Tasks? (arXiv:2605.21740, CC0)
Made by CMU Released May 2026 Genomics and life sciences All tasks public Last model added Mar 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
7
Models scored on its own leaderboard

GPT-5.4 leads with 40.2% among models released by Mar 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.4 medium 40.2%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro medium 39%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium 38%
  4. 4 Kimi K2.5 thinking 30.3%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 27.5%
  6. 6 DeepSeek-V3.2 24.3%
  7. 7 MiniMax-M2.7 19.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.4 40.2% medium Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39% medium Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 38% medium Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Kimi K2.5 30.3% thinking Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 27.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-V3.2 24.3% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
7 MiniMax-M2.7 19.3% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2026
GPT-5.4 40.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.4 Kimi K2.5 DeepSeek-V3.2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.4 Kimi K2.5

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Biology and chemistry

All 96 in Biology and chemistry
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
  • BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference. Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%