Benchmark Almanac

SLAKE

Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% leads since Aug 2026 Fading

Models answer English and Chinese questions about radiology images of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Scoring is accuracy.

The authors say the released data was cleaned and may differ slightly from the paper.

In the authors’ words

Medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) has tremendous potential in healthcare. However, the development of this technology is hindered by the lacking of publicly-available and high-quality labeled datasets for training and evaluation. In this paper, we present a large bilingual dataset, SLAKE, with comprehensive semantic labels annotated by experienced physicians and a new structural medical knowledge base for Med-VQA. Besides, SLAKE includes richer modalities and covers more human body parts than the currently available dataset. We show that SLAKE can be used to facilitate the development and evaluation of Med-VQA systems. The dataset can be downloaded from http://www.med-vqa.com/slake.

Abstract of SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answering (arXiv:2102.09542, CC0)
Made by Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Xiao-Ming Wu group) Released Feb 2021 Medicine All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 84.7%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 81.6%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 79.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 84.7% Mar 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 81.6% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 79.9% Feb 2026 Model card

4 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2026, by Qwen 3.8 Max
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%

The best score passed 85% in Aug 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8 SLAKE
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 84.7 SLAKE
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 81.6 SLAKE
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 79.9 SLAKE

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 84.7 SLAKE (Table 6) Health

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%