Benchmark Almanac

RoboTwin 2.0

GO-3 Nano Preview 85% tops its leaderboard π0.5 58.3% leads the models we track Not in model cards

Bimanual Aloha-AgileX sim: 50 tasks, policies trained on 50 clean demos per task, 100 trials each in clean and domain-randomized scenes.

Official board: team retrained 17 of 22 entries via XPolicyLab. Clean track crowding (top 89.58%), randomized top 68.12%. Self-reported paper numbers (~86-94%, larger demo budget) are saturated and not comparable.

In the authors’ words

Simulation-based data synthesis has emerged as a powerful paradigm for advancing real-world robotic manipulation. Yet existing datasets remain insufficient for robust bimanual manipulation due to (1) the lack of scalable task generation methods and (2) oversimplified simulation environments. We present RoboTwin 2.0, a scalable framework for automated, large-scale generation of diverse and realistic data, together with unified evaluation protocols for dual-arm manipulation. At its core is RoboTwin-OD, an object library of 731 instances across 147 categories with semantic and manipulation-relevant annotations. Building on this, we design an expert data synthesis pipeline that leverages multimodal language models (MLLMs) and simulation-in-the-loop refinement to automatically generate task-level execution code. To improve sim-to-real transfer, RoboTwin 2.0 applies structured domain randomization along five axes: clutter, lighting, background, tabletop height, and language, enhancing data diversity and policy robustness. The framework is instantiated across 50 dual-arm tasks and five robot embodiments. Empirically, it yields a 10.9% gain in code generation success rate. For downstream policy learning, a VLA model trained with synthetic data plus only 10 real demonstrations achieves a 367% relative improvement over the 10-demo baseline, while zero-shot models trained solely on synthetic data obtain a 228% gain. These results highlight the effectiveness of RoboTwin 2.0 in strengthening sim-to-real transfer and robustness to environmental variations. We release the data generator, benchmark, dataset, and code to support scalable research in robust bimanual manipulation. Project Page: https://robotwin-platform.github.io/, Code: https://github.com/robotwin-Platform/robotwin/.

Abstract of RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulation (arXiv:2506.18088, CC0)
Made by RoboTwin Platform (HKU MMLab + others) Released Jun 2025 Simulated robots All tasks public Last model added Apr 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
33
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

GO-3 Nano Preview tops the leaderboard with 85%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is π0.5, at 58.3%.

  1. 1 GO-3 Nano Preview cotrain 85%
  2. 2 PrismWAM* cotrain 83.7%
  3. 3 PICA-WAM cotrain 82.7%
  4. 4 CloudRobo-WM cotrain 82%
  5. 5 MWA-Phoenix cotrain 79.5%
  6. 6 PatchWAM cotrain 79.1%
  7. 7 ME-Dex-1.0 cotrain 78.8%
  8. 8 EWAM cotrain 77.1%
  9. 9 ViGAR cotrain 74.5%
  10. 10 UniWAM cotrain 71.3%
  11. 11 PrismWAM cotrain 70.6%
  12. 12 GigaBrain-0.7 cotrain 67.4%
  13. 13 WorldLA cotrain 64.5%
  14. 14 WorldScape Policy 2.0 cotrain 61.7%
  15. 15 4D-WAM cotrain 61.6%
  16. 16 π0.5 cotrain 58.3%
  17. 17 OLA-Geo cotrain 58.3%
  18. 18 Spatial Forcing cotrain 52%
  19. 19 X-WAM cotrain 47.9%
  20. 20 X-VLA cotrain 44.5%
  21. 21 Abot-M0 cotrain 43.9%
  22. 22 EventVLA cotrain 40.7%
  23. 23 Xiaomi Robotics-0 cotrain 40.5%
  24. 24 FastWAM cotrain 39.8%
  25. 25 GalaxeaVLA cotrain 37.7%
  26. 26 Discrete Forcing cotrain 35.3%
  27. 27 AHA-WAM cotrain 33.8%
  28. 28 π0 sft 31.4%
  29. 29 DP3 sft 30.1%
  30. 30 starVLA cotrain 24.8%
  31. 31 RDT sft 24.1%
  32. 32 ACT sft 15.7%
  33. 33 DP sft 14.3%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GO-3 Nano Preview 85% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 PrismWAM* 83.7% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 PICA-WAM 82.7% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
4 CloudRobo-WM 82% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 MWA-Phoenix 79.5% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
6 PatchWAM 79.1% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
7 ME-Dex-1.0 78.8% cotrain Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 EWAM 77.1% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
9 ViGAR 74.5% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
10 UniWAM 71.3% cotrain Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 PrismWAM 70.6% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GigaBrain-0.7 67.4% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
13 WorldLA 64.5% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
14 WorldScape Policy 2.0 61.7% cotrain Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
15 4D-WAM 61.6% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 π0.5 58.3% cotrain Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 OLA-Geo 58.3% cotrain Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Spatial Forcing 52% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
19 X-WAM 47.9% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
20 X-VLA 44.5% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Abot-M0 43.9% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
22 EventVLA 40.7% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Xiaomi Robotics-0 40.5% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
24 FastWAM 39.8% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
25 GalaxeaVLA 37.7% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
26 Discrete Forcing 35.3% cotrain Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
27 AHA-WAM 33.8% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
28 π0 31.4% sft Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
29 DP3 30.1% sft Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
30 starVLA 24.8% cotrain Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
31 RDT 24.1% sft Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
32 ACT 15.7% sft Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
33 DP 14.3% sft Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) π0.5 π0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) π0.5 π0

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in Robotics

All 86 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. GR00T N1.7 8.58%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials. MolmoAct 2 97.2%