LIBERO
Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials.
Saturated: 22 of 35 catalog models self-report >=97% four-suite average. Protocols differ by paper. The same models score 0.02-24.4% on RoboDojo. Papers move to LIBERO-Plus/PRO.
In the authors’ words
Lifelong learning offers a promising paradigm of building a generalist agent that learns and adapts over its lifespan. Unlike traditional lifelong learning problems in image and text domains, which primarily involve the transfer of declarative knowledge of entities and concepts, lifelong learning in decision-making (LLDM) also necessitates the transfer of procedural knowledge, such as actions and behaviors. To advance research in LLDM, we introduce LIBERO, a novel benchmark of lifelong learning for robot manipulation. Specifically, LIBERO highlights five key research topics in LLDM: 1) how to efficiently transfer declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, or the mixture of both; 2) how to design effective policy architectures and 3) effective algorithms for LLDM; 4) the robustness of a lifelong learner with respect to task ordering; and 5) the effect of model pretraining for LLDM. We develop an extendible procedural generation pipeline that can in principle generate infinitely many tasks. For benchmarking purpose, we create four task suites (130 tasks in total) that we use to investigate the above-mentioned research topics. To support sample-efficient learning, we provide high-quality human-teleoperated demonstration data for all tasks. Our extensive experiments present several insightful or even unexpected discoveries: sequential finetuning outperforms existing lifelong learning methods in forward transfer, no single visual encoder architecture excels at all types of knowledge transfer, and naive supervised pretraining can hinder agents' performance in the subsequent LLDM. Check the website at https://libero-project.github.io for the code and the datasets.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
MolmoAct 2 leads with 97.2% among models released by May 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
MolmoAct 2 97.2%
- 2
OpenVLA-OFT 97.1%
- 3 π0.5 96.8%
- 4 π0 94.2%
- 5 π0-FAST 85.5%
- 6
OpenVLA 76.5%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 97.2% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 97.1% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | π0.5 | 96.8% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | π0 | 94.2% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | π0-FAST | 85.5% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 76.5% | Sep 2024 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 May 2026 | 97.2 | LIBERO average success rate after post-training (MolmoAct 2-Think 98.1) | |
| 16 Dec 2025 | LIBERO Spatial 97.65%, Goal 97.5%, Object 98.45%, 10 (Long) 94.35%, 200 trials per suite, no average printed (examples/LIBERO README) | ||
| 8 Sep 2025 | π0.5 | 96.8 | LIBERO average of Libero Spatial 98.8, Object 98.2, Goal 98.0, Libero 10 92.4, π0.5 fine-tuned for 30k steps, checkpoint pi05_libero (Results table) |
| 27 Feb 2025 | 97.1 | LIBERO average with third-person and wrist images and robot state, modified datasets, Spatial 97.6, Object 98.4, Goal 97.9, Long 94.5 (Table I) | |
| 4 Feb 2025 | π0-FAST | 85.5 | LIBERO average of Libero Spatial 96.4, Object 96.8, Goal 88.6, Libero 10 60.2, π0-FAST fine-tuned for 30k steps (Results table) |
| 4 Feb 2025 | π0 | 94.2 | LIBERO average of Libero Spatial 96.8, Object 98.8, Goal 95.8, Libero 10 85.2, π0 fine-tuned for 30k steps (Results table) |
| 5 Sep 2024 | 76.5 | LIBERO average, OpenVLA fine-tuned, Spatial 84.7, Object 88.4, Goal 79.2, Long 53.7, three seeds of 500 trials (Appendix E, Table 12) |
3 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 May 2026 | | 97.2 | LIBERO average of Spatial, Object, Goal, Long after fine-tuning (Table 8). MolmoAct2-Think 98.1 | Capabilities |
| 26 Sep 2025 | | LIBERO Spatial 92%, Goal 86%, Object 92%, Long 76%, Libero-90 89.3%, one post-trained checkpoint per suite, no average printed (examples/Libero README) | Capabilities | |
| 28 May 2025 | π0.5 technical report | LIBERO Spatial 98.0, Object 97.8, Goal 95.6, 10 (Long) 85.8, LIBERO-90 96.0, fine-tuned from the generalist model, no average printed (Table 1) | Capabilities |
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate.
GR00T N1.7 8.58%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- RoboCasa GR1 Tabletop Tasks Fading A simulated Fourier GR-1 humanoid with dexterous hands does 24 tabletop pick-and-place tasks, including unseen object and container pairs. Success rate per task.
GR00T N1 50%