RoboDojo
Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate.
Far from saturated: the sim board top on 2026-10-09 was VPP2 with a 39.26 average score and 32.26% success. Models self-reporting 97-99% on LIBERO score far lower here. Team also evaluated GPT-6 Astra as an embodied agent.
In the authors’ words
Generalist robot manipulation policies have advanced rapidly, yet existing benchmarks remain limited in systematically evaluating their capabilities. Many rely on simple, short-horizon, or skill-narrow tasks with limited capability coverage, and are often conducted only in simulation or only in the real world. Simulation enables scalable feedback but misses physical deployment challenges, while real-world evaluation is costly, time-consuming, and difficult to reproduce. We introduce RoboDojo, a unified sim-and-real benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of generalist robot manipulation policies. RoboDojo includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 real-world tasks covering diverse and complementary manipulation capabilities. The simulation benchmark evaluates five dimensions: generalization, memory, precision, long-horizon execution, and open-vocabulary instruction following, while the real-world benchmark exposes policies to challenging physical-world deployment conditions. RoboDojo supports scalable evaluation through heterogeneous parallel simulation in Isaac Sim and provides RoboDojo-RealEval, a reproducible real-world evaluation system with remote cloud access, standardized hardware, scene reset, evaluation protocol, and deployment interface. Together with XPolicyLab, policies can be integrated once and evaluated across simulation and real-world settings with minimal adaptation. We integrate 30 policies into XPolicyLab and evaluate them on RoboDojo, establishing a public leaderboard and systematic analysis of current policy performance. The website is available at http://robodojo-benchmark.com/.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Q0-Preview tops the leaderboard with 74.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-6 Astra, at 29%.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- and 14 more
- 74.2 Q0-Preview
- 61.9 GO-3 Nano Preview
- 55.3 PyRUA-Lean
- 53.2 HexaShell-Preview
- 46.6 WorldScape-R²SI
- 45.1 EmbodiedEvo
- 42.6 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite
- 39.3 VPP2
- 36.3 PhysicalRSI
- 35.3 Awomo-0.5
- 34.0 Simate-beta
- 33.8 Rex-M1 Preview
- 32.8 HWM-0 Preview
- 31.4 VPP2-Preview
- 30.8 InternW0-Δ
- 30.7 Liber-0 Preview
- 29.2 Liber-0 Lite
- 29.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 24.9 DM0.5
- 21.7 ME-Brain-1.0
- 20.2 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5)
- 20.1 Xiaomi-Robotics-1
- 17.8 MachEmbodied-U0
- 17.2 OpenWAM-α
- 15.2 EWAM
- 14.9 Meituan-Robotics-0
- 14.3 HWM-CogWAM
- 13.1 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA
- 13.0 KinRT
- 12.6 SimpleMemVLA
- 12.4 Spatial Forcing
- 11.4 π0.5
- 11.2 InternVLA-A1.5
- 10.8 StarVLA-PI_v3
- 10.7 VLAct
- 10.1 X-VLA
- 8.99
MolmoAct 2
- 8.25 StarVLA-GR00T
- 8.18 StarVLA-OFT
- 7.69 X-WAM
- 6.93 Xiaomi-Robotics-0
- 6.40 StarVLA
- 6.20 GigaWorld-Policy-0
- 5.82 GalaxeaVLA (G0)
- 5.50 LingBot-VLA
- 4.97 EventVLA
- 4.82 AHA-WAM
- 3.67 ABot-M0
- 3.48 Fast-WAM
- 3.48 π0
- 2.99 DeepSeek-Flash
- 2.85 GROOT-N1.7
- 2.48 InternVLA-A1
- 1.82 SmolVLA (Single Task)
- 1.66 LDA-1B
- 1.13 GPT-5.5
- 1.08 ACT (Single Task)
- 0.99 GO-1
- 0.67 H-RDT
- 0.51 RDT
- 0.45 DM0
- 0.38 Dexora-1B
- 0.28 A1
- 0.23 Spirit v1.5
- 0.22 TinyVLA
- 0.21
OpenVLA-OFT
- 1 Q0-Preview 74.2%
- 2 GO-3 Nano Preview 61.9%
- 3 PyRUA-Lean 55.3%
- 4 HexaShell-Preview 53.2%
- 5 WorldScape-R²SI 46.6%
- 6 EmbodiedEvo 45.1%
- 7 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite 42.6%
- 8 VPP2 39.3%
- 9 PhysicalRSI 36.3%
- 10 Awomo-0.5 35.3%
- 11 Simate-beta 34%
- 12 Rex-M1 Preview 33.8%
- 13 HWM-0 Preview 32.8%
- 14 VPP2-Preview 31.4%
- 15 InternW0-Δ 30.8%
- 16 Liber-0 Preview 30.7%
- 17 Liber-0 Lite 29.2%
- 18 GPT-6 Astra 29%
- 19 DM0.5 24.9%
- 20 ME-Brain-1.0 21.7%
- 21 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) 20.2%
- 22 Xiaomi-Robotics-1 20.1%
- 23 MachEmbodied-U0 17.8%
- 24 OpenWAM-α 17.2%
- 25 EWAM 15.2%
- 26 Meituan-Robotics-0 14.9%
- 27 HWM-CogWAM 14.3%
- 28 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA 13.1%
- 29 KinRT 13%
- 30 SimpleMemVLA 12.6%
- 31 Spatial Forcing 12.4%
- 32 π0.5 11.4%
- 33 InternVLA-A1.5 11.2%
- 34 StarVLA-PI_v3 10.8%
- 35 VLAct 10.7%
- 36 X-VLA 10.1%
- 37
MolmoAct 2 8.99%
- 38 StarVLA-GR00T 8.25%
- 39 StarVLA-OFT 8.18%
- 40 X-WAM 7.69%
- 41 Xiaomi-Robotics-0 6.93%
- 42 StarVLA 6.40%
- 43 GigaWorld-Policy-0 6.20%
- 44 GalaxeaVLA (G0) 5.82%
- 45 LingBot-VLA 5.50%
- 46 EventVLA 4.97%
- 47 AHA-WAM 4.82%
- 48 ABot-M0 3.67%
- 49 Fast-WAM 3.48%
- 50 π0 3.48%
- 51 DeepSeek-Flash 2.99%
- 52 GROOT-N1.7 2.85%
- 53 InternVLA-A1 2.48%
- 54 SmolVLA (Single Task) 1.82%
- 55 LDA-1B 1.66%
- 56 GPT-5.5 1.13%
- 57 ACT (Single Task) 1.08%
- 58 GO-1 0.99%
- 59 H-RDT 0.67%
- 60 RDT 0.51%
- 61 DM0 0.45%
- 62 Dexora-1B 0.38%
- 63 A1 0.28%
- 64 Spirit v1.5 0.23%
- 65 TinyVLA 0.22%
- 66
OpenVLA-OFT 0.21%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q0-Preview | 74.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GO-3 Nano Preview | 61.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | PyRUA-Lean | 55.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | HexaShell-Preview | 53.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | WorldScape-R²SI | 46.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | EmbodiedEvo | 45.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | WALL-OSS-1.0-lite | 42.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | VPP2 | 39.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | PhysicalRSI | 36.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Awomo-0.5 | 35.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Simate-beta | 34% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Rex-M1 Preview | 33.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | HWM-0 Preview | 32.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | VPP2-Preview | 31.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | InternW0-Δ | 30.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Liber-0 Preview | 30.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Liber-0 Lite | 29.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | GPT-6 Astra | 29% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | DM0.5 | 24.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | ME-Brain-1.0 | 21.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) | 20.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Xiaomi-Robotics-1 | 20.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | MachEmbodied-U0 | 17.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | OpenWAM-α | 17.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | EWAM | 15.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | Meituan-Robotics-0 | 14.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | HWM-CogWAM | 14.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA | 13.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | KinRT | 13% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | SimpleMemVLA | 12.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 31 | Spatial Forcing | 12.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | π0.5 | 11.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | InternVLA-A1.5 | 11.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 34 | StarVLA-PI_v3 | 10.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 35 | VLAct | 10.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | X-VLA | 10.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | | 8.99% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | StarVLA-GR00T | 8.25% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 39 | StarVLA-OFT | 8.18% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 40 | X-WAM | 7.69% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 41 | Xiaomi-Robotics-0 | 6.93% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 42 | StarVLA | 6.40% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 43 | GigaWorld-Policy-0 | 6.20% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 44 | GalaxeaVLA (G0) | 5.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 45 | LingBot-VLA | 5.50% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 46 | EventVLA | 4.97% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 47 | AHA-WAM | 4.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 48 | ABot-M0 | 3.67% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 49 | Fast-WAM | 3.48% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 50 | π0 | 3.48% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | DeepSeek-Flash | 2.99% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 52 | GROOT-N1.7 | 2.85% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 53 | InternVLA-A1 | 2.48% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 54 | SmolVLA (Single Task) | 1.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 55 | LDA-1B | 1.66% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 56 | GPT-5.5 | 1.13% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | ACT (Single Task) | 1.08% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 58 | GO-1 | 0.99% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 59 | H-RDT | 0.67% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 60 | RDT | 0.51% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 61 | DM0 | 0.45% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 62 | Dexora-1B | 0.38% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 63 | A1 | 0.28% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 64 | Spirit v1.5 | 0.23% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 65 | TinyVLA | 0.22% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 66 | | 0.21% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate.
GR00T N1.7 8.58%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials.
MolmoAct 2 97.2%