Benchmark Almanac

RedlineBench

GPT-5.5 50.5% leads since Jun 2026 Not in model cards

Agent acts as counsel at one turn of a SaaS contract negotiation and returns tracked-change redlines. Three LLM judges grade attorney-written rubrics.

Attorneys wrote a branching tree of golden responses. The counterparty playbook is hidden from the agent. Built without client data.

Made by Crosby Intelligence + micro1 Released Jun 2026 Law All tasks public Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
4
Models scored on its own leaderboard

GPT-5.5 leads with 50.5% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.5 50.5%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 47.3%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.5 Flash 45.1%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.8 44.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.5 50.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 47.3% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.5 Flash 45.1% May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.8 44.4% May 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026
GPT-5.5 50.5%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%