RCM-Bench-1
Agents handle healthcare revenue cycle work, such as claim submission, billing and eligibility checks, with tools. Checks cover tool calls, arguments, replies and final system state.
97 scenarios across six workflows, weighted equally. 20 models in the Fireworks index. The maker page renders in the browser only.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Claude Opus 5 leads with 92.7%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
- 92.7 Claude Opus 5
- 91.5
Gemini 4 Argon
- 91.2 Claude Sonnet 5
- 91.2 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 91.0 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 90.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 90.1 Claude Opus 5.5
- 89.8 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 89.0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 88.4 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 88.3 GLM-5.3
- 88.2 Grok 4.7
- 87.8 Claude Opus 4.6
- 87.4 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 87.0 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 85.8 GPT-6 Luna
- 84.3 GPT-5 mini
- 81.5 GPT-6 Sol
- 71.5 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 70.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 1 Claude Opus 5 92.7%
- 2
Gemini 4 Argon medium 91.5%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 5 91.2%
- 4 GPT-5.6 Sol medium 91.2%
- 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 91%
- 6
Gemini 3.8 Flash medium 90.2%
- 7 Claude Opus 5.5 90.1%
- 8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 89.8%
- 9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 89%
- 10 Claude Haiku 5.5 88.4%
- 11 GLM-5.3 88.3%
- 12 Grok 4.7 88.2%
- 13 Claude Opus 4.6 87.8%
- 14 GPT-6.1 Sol medium 87.4%
- 15 GPT-5.6 Terra medium 87%
- 16 GPT-6 Luna medium 85.8%
- 17 GPT-5 mini 84.3%
- 18 GPT-6 Sol medium 81.5%
- 19 GPT-5.6 Luna none 71.5%
- 20 Claude Haiku 4.5 70.2%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 | 92.7% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 91.5% | medium | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 91.2% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 91.2% | medium | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 90.2% | medium | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 90.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 89.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 89% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 88.4% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GLM-5.3 | 88.3% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Grok 4.7 | 88.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 87.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 87.4% | medium | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 87% | medium | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GPT-6 Luna | 85.8% | medium | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | GPT-5 mini | 84.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-6 Sol | 81.5% | medium | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 71.5% | none | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 70.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The best score, 92.7%, costs $0.15 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Claude Haiku 5.5 comes within 4.3 points of the best for $0.003 a task, 50 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 92.7% | $0.15 | |||
| | medium | 91.5% | $0.09 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | 91.2% | $0.05 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | medium | 91.2% | $0.07 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91% | $0.05 | |||
| | medium | 90.2% | $0.02 | ||
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 90.1% | $0.09 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 89.8% | $0.05 | |||
| | 89% | ||||
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 88.4% | $0.003 | |||
| GLM-5.3 | 88.3% | $0.02 | |||
| Grok 4.7 | 88.2% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | 87.8% | ||||
| GPT-6.1 Sol | medium | 87.4% | $0.02 | ||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | medium | 87% | $0.04 | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | medium | 85.8% | $0.002 | ||
| GPT-5 mini | 84.3% | $0.008 | |||
| GPT-6 Sol | medium | 81.5% | $0.03 | ||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | none | 71.5% | $0.003 | ||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 70.2% | $0.01 |
5 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%