Benchmark Almanac

Quant-Arena

Kepler-1 77.6 tops its leaderboard GPT-6 Astra 51.3 leads the models we track Not in model cards

Models act as quant researchers on 2022 to 2023 China A-share data with bounded feedback, then commit one strategy. A cash-account evaluator with trading costs scores it once on a sealed 2024 window.

Models get raw daily and Level-2 data for 3,042 stocks. The score weights the sealed year 70% and the research window 30%. None of nine frontier models beat the equal-weight market in 2024.

In the authors’ words

Quantitative research is an iterative loop: a researcher proposes a market hypothesis, implements it as an executable signal, tests it on historical data, and decides what to keep. Existing benchmarks score formulas, code, or individual trading decisions, leaving open whether large language models (LLMs) can complete this loop and produce strategies that work beyond the research period. We introduce Quant-Arena, a benchmark and public leaderboard for end-to-end quantitative research on real A-share market data. A model constructs features and stock-scoring code, receives feedback only on 2022–2023, and freezes one strategy for assessment on the sealed year 2024. A cash-account evaluator applies trading constraints and costs, including market impact estimated from a simulated order book. Scores are dominated by realized excess return and complemented by signal quality and the diversity of features used by the strategy. We evaluate nine frontier models, among which GPT-6 Astra scores highest; yet no model beats the equal-weight market in 2024. Quant-Arena is open to submissions from any model or agent harness.

Abstract of Quant-Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Quantitative Trading Research (arXiv:2610.30113, CC0)
Made by Einsia AI (Navers Lab, LaPlace's Eye) Released Oct 2026 Finance Tasks kept private Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Kepler-1 tops the leaderboard with 77.6

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-6 Astra, at 51.3.

  1. 1 Kepler-1 77.6
  2. 2 GPT-6 Astra 51.3
  3. 3 GPT-6 Sol 51.1
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Terra 47.6
  5. 5 Claude Opus 5.5 44.3
  6. 6 Gemini 3.8 Flash 43.0
  7. 7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 40.9
  8. 8 GLM-5.3 38.9
  9. 9 Kimi K3 38.3
  10. 10 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 36.5
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kepler-1 77.6 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-6 Astra 51.3 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Sol 51.1 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Terra 47.6 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 5.5 44.3 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.8 Flash 43.0 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 40.9 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GLM-5.3 38.9 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Kimi K3 38.3 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 36.5 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%