Benchmark Almanac

Protocols (Anthropic life sciences)

Claude Sonnet 5 62% leads since Jul 2026 Only in system cards

Models find and fix errors in molecular biology protocols and answer practical questions about applying real laboratory protocols.

Reported as two variants, Troubleshooting and Understanding (V2), with no overall score. Benchling built the Understanding set. From the Claude Opus 5.5 system card it is one of three evaluations Anthropic uses for CB-1 capability, with VCT and BioMysteryBench, replacing the Long-Form Virology Tasks.

Made by Anthropic (with Benchling) Released Jul 2026 Lab protocols Tasks kept private Last in a system card Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
3
Models scored in lab cards
7
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Sonnet 5 leads with 62% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Sonnet 5 62%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.8 59.6%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 51.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Sonnet 5 62% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Claude Opus 4.8 59.6% May 2026 Model card
3 Claude Opus 4.7 51.8% Apr 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims Not tested since Jul 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 4.7 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 4.7

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

7 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
7 Oct 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card Protocols, Troubleshooting 58.0 and Understanding (V2) 64.1, no overall (8.13.6, CB-1 evaluation in 2.2.2) Bio and chem risk
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card Protocols, Troubleshooting 67.3% and Understanding (V2) 66.6%, no overall (2.2.2 and 8.17.8, Figure 8.17.A) Bio and chem risk
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card Protocols, Troubleshooting 73.7% and Understanding (V2) 69.0%, no overall, final model (2.2.3.1 and 8.17.8) Bio and chem risk
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card Protocols, Troubleshooting 61.1% and Understanding 78.4%, no overall (8.17.6) Capabilities
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 62 Protocol troubleshooting, with web search, score 0.62. Only the Troubleshooting variant is reported (8.14.6, Figure 8.14.6.A) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 59.6 Protocol troubleshooting with bash and web search tools. Only the Troubleshooting part is reported (8.16.7) Capabilities
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 51.8 Protocol troubleshooting with bash and web search tools. Only the troubleshooting variant is reported (8.13.6) Capabilities

More in Biology and chemistry

All 96 in Biology and chemistry
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
  • BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference. Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%