ProofBench
Models write Lean 4 proofs of graduate-level theorems, with Mathlib search and code tools for up to 40 turns. Scored by the share that compile.
Vals froze the v1 board on 2026-08-05 with Claude Opus 5 on top at 78%. ProofBench v1.1 replaced it on 2026-08-13 with non-comparable scores.
In the authors’ words
We present FormalProofBench, a private benchmark designed to evaluate whether AI models can produce formally verified mathematical proofs at the graduate level. Each task pairs a natural-language problem with a Lean 4 formal statement, and a model must output a Lean proof accepted by the Lean 4 checker. FormalProofBench targets advanced undergraduate and graduate mathematics, with problems drawn from qualifying exams and standard textbooks across topics including analysis, algebra, probability, and logic. We evaluate a range of frontier models with an agentic harness, and find that the best-performing foundation model achieves 33.5% accuracy, with performance dropping rapidly after that. In addition to the accuracy numbers, we also provide empirical analysis of tool-use, failure modes, cost and latency, thereby providing a thorough evaluation of the formal-theorem proving abilities of frontier models.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Written proof
Claude Opus 5 leads with 78% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 9 more
- 78.0 Claude Opus 5
- 77.0 Claude Fable 5
- 77.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 71.0 Aristotle
- 71.0 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 70.0 Kimi K3
- 69.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 66.0 Claude Sonnet 5
- 57.0
Muse Spark 1.2
- 56.0 GPT-5.4
- 54.0 Claude Opus 4.7
- 54.0 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 50.0 Claude Opus 4.6
- 50.0 GPT-5.5
- 49.0
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- 47.0
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 45.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 45.0 Grok 4.6
- 39.0
Muse Spark 1.1
- 39.0
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- 36.0 Claude Opus 4.5
- 36.0
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 35.0 GLM-5.2
- 30.0 Grok 4.5
- 29.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 26.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 26.0
Qwen3.7-Max
- 24.0 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 22.2 GLM-5.1
- 21.0 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 20.0
Gemini 3 Pro
- 19.0 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 19.0
MiniMax-M3
- 18.0 GPT-5
- 17.0
Muse Spark
- 16.0 Kimi K2.6
- 16.0 MiMo-V2.5
- 15.0 GPT-5.2
- 15.0
Gemini 3 Flash
- 14.0 Grok 4.20
- 13.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 12.0 GPT-5 nano
- 11.0 Grok 4.3
- 10.0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 10.0
Mistral Medium 3.5
- 9.00 GPT-5 mini
- 9.00 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
- 8.00
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 8.00
Qwen3.6 27B
- 6.00 GLM-4.7
- 6.00
Ling-3.0-flash
- 5.00 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 5.00
Inkling-Small
- 4.00 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 4.00
MiniMax-M2.5
- 3.00
MiniMax-M2.7
- 2.00
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 2.00
Inkling
- 0.0
Laguna M.1
- 0.0
Laguna XS.2
- 1 Claude Opus 5 78%
- 2 Claude Fable 5 77%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 77%
- 4 Aristotle 71%
- 5 GPT-5.6 Terra 71%
- 6 Kimi K3 70%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.8 69%
- 8 Claude Sonnet 5 66%
- 9
Muse Spark 1.2 57%
- 10 GPT-5.4 xhigh 56%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.7 54%
- 12 GPT-5.6 Luna 54%
- 13 Claude Opus 4.6 thinking 50%
- 14 GPT-5.5 50%
- 15
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 49%
- 16
Qwen 3.8 Max 47%
- 17 Claude Sonnet 4.6 45%
- 18 Grok 4.6 45%
- 19
Muse Spark 1.1 39%
- 20
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 39%
- 21 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 36%
- 22
Gemini 3.6 Flash 36%
- 23 GLM-5.2 35%
- 24 Grok 4.5 30%
- 25
Gemini 3.5 Flash 29%
- 26
Gemini 3.1 Pro 26%
- 27
Qwen3.7-Max 26%
- 28 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 24%
- 29 GLM-5.1 22.2%
- 30 GPT-5.4 Mini 21%
- 31
Gemini 3 Pro 20%
- 32 Claude Sonnet 4.5 thinking 19%
- 33
MiniMax-M3 19%
- 34 GPT-5 18%
- 35
Muse Spark 17%
- 36 Kimi K2.6 16%
- 37 MiMo-V2.5 16%
- 38 GPT-5.2 15%
- 39
Gemini 3 Flash 15%
- 40 Grok 4.20 14%
- 41
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 13%
- 42 GPT-5 nano 12%
- 43 Grok 4.3 11%
- 44
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10%
- 45
Mistral Medium 3.5 10%
- 46 GPT-5 mini 9.00%
- 47 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 9.00%
- 48
DeepSeek-V3.2 non-thinking 8.00%
- 49
Qwen3.6 27B 8.00%
- 50 GLM-4.7 6.00%
- 51
Ling-3.0-flash 6.00%
- 52 GPT-5.4 Nano 5.00%
- 53
Inkling-Small 5.00%
- 54 Grok 4.1 Fast 4.00%
- 55
MiniMax-M2.5 4.00%
- 56
MiniMax-M2.7 3.00%
- 57
Nemotron 3 Ultra 2.00%
- 58
Inkling 2.00%
- 59
Laguna M.1 0%
- 60
Laguna XS.2 0%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 | 78% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 77% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 77% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Aristotle | 71% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 71% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 70% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 69% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 66% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 57% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5.4 | 56% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 54% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 54% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 50% | thinking | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-5.5 | 50% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 49% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 47% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 45% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Grok 4.6 | 45% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 39% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 39% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 36% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 36% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GLM-5.2 | 35% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Grok 4.5 | 30% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 29% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 26% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 26% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 24% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | GLM-5.1 | 22.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 21% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 20% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 19% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | | 19% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | GPT-5 | 18% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 17% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Kimi K2.6 | 16% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | MiMo-V2.5 | 16% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GPT-5.2 | 15% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 15% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | Grok 4.20 | 14% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 13% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | GPT-5 nano | 12% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Grok 4.3 | 11% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 10% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 10% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | GPT-5 mini | 9.00% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | 9.00% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 8.00% | non-thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | | 8.00% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | GLM-4.7 | 6.00% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 6.00% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 5.00% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | | 5.00% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 4.00% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 4.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 3.00% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | | 2.00% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 2.00% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 0% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 0% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Epoch AI has scores for 83 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
The best score, 78%, costs $2.11 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 78% | $2.11 | |||
| Claude Fable 5 | 77% | $5.45 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 77% | $1.74 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | 71% | $0.94 | |||
| Kimi K3 | 70% | $1.67 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 69% | $2.29 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | 66% | $2.25 | |||
| | 57% | $0.54 | |||
| GPT-5.4 | xhigh | 56% | $3.20 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 54% | $1.81 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 54% | $0.09 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | thinking | 50% | $2.70 | ||
| GPT-5.5 | 50% | $1.68 | |||
| | 49% | $0.07 | |||
| | 47% | $1.58 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 45% | $2.16 | |||
| Grok 4.6 | 45% | $0.76 | |||
| | 39% | $0.52 | |||
| | 39% | $0.03 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | thinking | 36% | $1.27 | ||
| | 36% | $0.52 | |||
| GLM-5.2 | 35% | ||||
| Grok 4.5 | 30% | $0.48 | |||
| | 29% | $1.40 | |||
| | 26% | $0.53 | |||
| | 26% | $2.46 | |||
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 24% | $0.07 | |||
| GLM-5.1 | 22.2% | $0.58 | |||
| GPT-5.4 Mini | 21% | $0.25 | |||
| | 20% | $1.23 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | thinking | 19% | $0.65 | ||
| | 19% | $0.37 | |||
| GPT-5 | 18% | $0.85 | |||
| | 17% | ||||
| Kimi K2.6 | 16% | $0.30 | |||
| MiMo-V2.5 | 16% | $0.07 | |||
| GPT-5.2 | 15% | $1.06 | |||
| | 15% | $0.33 | |||
| Grok 4.20 | 14% | $0.32 | |||
| | 13% | $0.13 | |||
| GPT-5 nano | 12% | $0.05 | |||
| Grok 4.3 | 11% | $0.24 | |||
| | 10% | ||||
| | 10% | $1.50 | |||
| GPT-5 mini | 9.00% | $0.22 | |||
| GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | 9.00% | $0.53 | |||
| | non-thinking | 8.00% | $0.12 | ||
| | 8.00% | $0.51 | |||
| GLM-4.7 | 6.00% | $0.14 | |||
| | 6.00% | $0.04 | |||
| GPT-5.4 Nano | 5.00% | $0.02 | |||
| | 5.00% | $0.08 | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4.00% | $0.10 | |||
| | thinking | 4.00% | $0.13 | ||
| | 4.00% | $0.06 | |||
| | 3.00% | $0.04 | |||
| | 2.00% | ||||
| | 2.00% | $0.20 | |||
| | 0% | ||||
| | 0% |
6 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and Epoch AI’s runs.
The best score passed 85% in Jun 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Math
- IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
- AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
- HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
- MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
- PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked.
Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
- USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%