POPE
Vision language models answer yes or no questions about whether objects appear in COCO images. Scored by accuracy or F1 on object hallucination.
In the authors’ words
Inspired by the superior language abilities of large language models (LLM), large vision-language models (LVLM) have been recently explored by integrating powerful LLMs for improving the performance on complex multimodal tasks. Despite the promising progress on LVLMs, we find that LVLMs suffer from the hallucination problem, i.e. they tend to generate objects that are inconsistent with the target images in the descriptions. To investigate it, this work presents the first systematic study on object hallucination of LVLMs. We conduct the evaluation experiments on several representative LVLMs, and show that they mostly suffer from severe object hallucination issue. We further discuss that the visual instructions may influence the hallucination, and find that: objects that frequently occur in the visual instructions or co-occur with the image objects, are obviously prone to be hallucinated by LVLMs. Besides, we find that existing evaluation methods might be affected by the input instructions and generation styles of LVLMs. Thus, we further design an improved evaluation method for object hallucination by proposing a polling-based query method called POPE. Experiment results demonstrate that our POPE can evaluate the object hallucination in a more stable and flexible way. Our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/POPE.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 90.7% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 90.7%
- 2 LFM2.5-VL-3B 88.7%
- 3
Janus-Pro-7B 87.4%
- 4 LFM2-VL-1.6B 87.2%
- 5
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 87%
- 6 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 86.1%
- 7
Phi-4-multimodal 85.6%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.7% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 88.7% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 87.4% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 87.2% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 87% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 86.1% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 85.6% | Feb 2025 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in May 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Aug 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 88.7 | POPE |
| 26 Feb 2025 | 85.6 | POPE | |
| 27 Jan 2025 | 87.4 | POPE |
6 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report | 87.2 | POPE, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 87 | POPE, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 88.8 | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 90.7 | POPE (avg) (Table 6) | Hallucination |
| 3 Mar 2025 | | 85.6 | POPE (test) (Table 1) | Hallucination |
| 27 Jan 2025 | | 87.4 | POPE (Table 3) | Hallucination |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 86.1 | POPE (test) (Table 5) | Hallucination |
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
- RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%