PolicyBench
No-tools estimate of US taxes and benefits for 100 households across 18 programs. Headline metric is answers within $1 of PolicyEngine-US.
Prompts and reference values are public, so the authors call the board a preview. Forced tool calls lowered some Claude scores.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
GPT-6 Sol leads with 95.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 95.2 GPT-6 Sol
- 94.1 Claude Opus 5.5
- 93.1 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 93.1 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 91.7 GPT-6 Astra
- 91.7 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 91.5 GPT-6 Luna
- 90.8 Claude Fable 5.1
- 90.5 Kimi K3
- 90.2 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 90.0
Muse Wonder
- 88.7 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 88.6
Gemini 4 Argon
- 88.6 ox-alpha
- 88.0 GPT-5.5
- 87.7
Inkling
- 87.6 Grok 4.7
- 87.6 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 87.2
Muse Spark 1.3
- 86.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 85.8 Grok 4.6
- 85.6
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 84.7 Grok 4.5
- 83.6 Claude Opus 5
- 83.3 Claude Fable 5
- 83.0
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- 82.9
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- 82.7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 82.6
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 81.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 81.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 81.1 GLM-5.3
- 80.6
Gemini 3 Flash
- 80.5 Claude Opus 4.7
- 80.3 Grok 4.3
- 79.9 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 79.9 Grok Build 0.1
- 79.8
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 79.3
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 79.3
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 79.2 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 76.9
Qwen3.7-Max
- 76.5 GLM-5.2
- 75.8 Claude Opus 4.8
- 75.4
MiniMax-M3
- 74.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 74.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 73.3 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 72.3 Claude Sonnet 5
- 66.9 Kimi K2.6
- 65.3 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 1 GPT-6 Sol 95.2%
- 2 Claude Opus 5.5 94.1%
- 3 GPT-6.1 Terra 93.1%
- 4 GPT-5.6 Sol 93.1%
- 5 GPT-6 Astra 91.7%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 91.7%
- 7 GPT-6 Luna 91.5%
- 8 Claude Fable 5.1 90.8%
- 9 Kimi K3 90.5%
- 10 GPT-6.1 Sol 90.2%
- 11
Muse Wonder 90%
- 12 GPT-5.6 Luna 88.7%
- 13
Gemini 4 Argon 88.6%
- 14 ox-alpha 88.6%
- 15 GPT-5.5 88%
- 16
Inkling 87.7%
- 17 Grok 4.7 87.6%
- 18 GPT-5.6 Terra 87.6%
- 19
Muse Spark 1.3 87.2%
- 20
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 86.3%
- 21 Grok 4.6 85.8%
- 22
Gemini 3.8 Flash 85.6%
- 23 Grok 4.5 84.7%
- 24 Claude Opus 5 83.6%
- 25 Claude Fable 5 83.3%
- 26
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 83%
- 27
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 82.9%
- 28
Gemini 3.7 Flash 82.7%
- 29
Gemini 3.6 Flash 82.6%
- 30
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 81.5%
- 31
Gemini 3.1 Pro 81.2%
- 32 GLM-5.3 81.1%
- 33
Gemini 3 Flash 80.6%
- 34 Claude Opus 4.7 80.5%
- 35 Grok 4.3 80.3%
- 36 Claude Sonnet 4.6 79.9%
- 37 Grok Build 0.1 79.9%
- 38
Gemini 3.5 Flash 79.8%
- 39
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 79.3%
- 40
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 79.3%
- 41 Claude Haiku 5.5 79.2%
- 42
Qwen3.7-Max 76.9%
- 43 GLM-5.2 76.5%
- 44 Claude Opus 4.8 75.8%
- 45
MiniMax-M3 75.4%
- 46
Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8%
- 47 Claude Haiku 4.5 74.5%
- 48 GPT-5.4 Mini 73.3%
- 49 Claude Sonnet 5 72.3%
- 50 Kimi K2.6 66.9%
- 51 GPT-5.4 Nano 65.3%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Sol | 95.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 94.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 93.1% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 93.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-6 Astra | 91.7% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91.7% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-6 Luna | 91.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 90.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Kimi K3 | 90.5% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 90.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 90% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 88.7% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 88.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | ox-alpha | 88.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | GPT-5.5 | 88% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 87.7% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Grok 4.7 | 87.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 87.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 87.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 86.3% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Grok 4.6 | 85.8% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 85.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Grok 4.5 | 84.7% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Claude Opus 5 | 83.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude Fable 5 | 83.3% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 83% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 82.9% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 82.7% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 82.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 81.5% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 81.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | GLM-5.3 | 81.1% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 80.6% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Grok 4.3 | 80.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 79.9% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Grok Build 0.1 | 79.9% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 79.8% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 79.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 79.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 79.2% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 76.9% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | GLM-5.2 | 76.5% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 75.8% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 75.4% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 74.8% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 74.5% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 73.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 72.3% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | Kimi K2.6 | 66.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 65.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The best score, 95.2%, costs $0.03 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. GPT-6 Luna comes within 3.7 points of the best for $0.002 a task, 14 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Sol | 95.2% | $0.03 | |||
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 94.1% | $0.07 | |||
| GPT-6.1 Terra | 93.1% | $0.01 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 93.1% | $0.09 | |||
| GPT-6 Astra | 91.7% | $0.13 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91.7% | $0.03 | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | 91.5% | $0.002 | |||
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 90.8% | $0.26 | |||
| Kimi K3 | 90.5% | $0.47 | |||
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 90.2% | $0.02 | |||
| | 90% | $0.08 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 88.7% | $0.02 | |||
| | 88.6% | $0.03 | |||
| GPT-5.5 | 88% | $0.26 | |||
| | 87.7% | $0.09 | |||
| Grok 4.7 | 87.6% | $0.26 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | 87.6% | $0.04 | |||
| | 87.2% | $0.02 | |||
| | 86.3% | $0.02 | |||
| Grok 4.6 | 85.8% | $0.09 | |||
| | 85.6% | $0.07 | |||
| Grok 4.5 | 84.7% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude Opus 5 | 83.6% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude Fable 5 | 83.3% | $0.54 | |||
| | 83% | $0.20 | |||
| | 82.9% | $0.003 | |||
| | 82.7% | $0.01 | |||
| | 82.6% | $0.05 | |||
| | 81.5% | $0.003 | |||
| | 81.2% | $0.08 | |||
| GLM-5.3 | 81.1% | $0.17 | |||
| | 80.6% | $0.05 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.5% | $0.29 | |||
| Grok 4.3 | 80.3% | $0.02 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 79.9% | $0.19 | |||
| Grok Build 0.1 | 79.9% | $0.04 | |||
| | 79.8% | $0.06 | |||
| | 79.3% | $0.002 | |||
| | 79.3% | $0.01 | |||
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 79.2% | $0.001 | |||
| | 76.9% | $0.14 | |||
| GLM-5.2 | 76.5% | $0.08 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 75.8% | $0.26 | |||
| | 75.4% | $0.007 | |||
| | 74.8% | $0.22 | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 74.5% | $0.06 | |||
| GPT-5.4 Mini | 73.3% | $0.006 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | 72.3% | $0.17 | |||
| Kimi K2.6 | 66.9% | $0.39 | |||
| GPT-5.4 Nano | 65.3% | $0.002 |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Apr 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%