Benchmark Almanac

PMC-VQA

Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2% leads since Aug 2026 Fading

Models answer multiple-choice questions about medical images drawn from PubMed Central figures. Scored by accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) presents a significant opportunity to enhance diagnostic accuracy and healthcare delivery by leveraging artificial intelligence to interpret and answer questions based on medical images. In this study, we reframe the problem of MedVQA as a generation task that naturally follows the human-machine interaction and propose a generative-based model for medical visual understanding by aligning visual information from a pre-trained vision encoder with a large language model. We establish a scalable pipeline to construct a large-scale medical visual question-answering dataset, named PMC-VQA, which contains 227k VQA pairs of 149k images that cover various modalities or diseases. We train the proposed model on PMC-VQA and then fine-tune it on multiple public benchmarks, e.g., VQA-RAD, SLAKE, and Image-Clef-2019, significantly outperforming existing MedVQA models in generating relevant, accurate free-form answers. In addition, we propose a test set that has undergone manual verification, which is significantly more challenging, serving to better monitor the development of generative MedVQA methods. To facilitate comprehensive evaluation and comparison, we have maintained a leaderboard at https://paperswithcode.com/paper/pmc-vqa-visual-instruction-tuning-for-medical, offering a centralized resource for tracking progress and benchmarking state-of-the-art approaches. The PMC-VQA dataset emerges as a vital resource for the field of research, and the MedVInT presents a significant breakthrough in the area of MedVQA.

Abstract of PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering (arXiv:2305.10415, CC0)
Made by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Shanghai AI Laboratory Released May 2023 Medicine All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 66.2% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2%
  2. 2 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 64.2%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 63.3%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 62.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 64.2% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 63.3% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 62.7% Mar 2026 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in May 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2 PMC-VQA
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 62.7 PMC-VQA
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 63.3 PMC-VQA
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 64.2 PMC-VQA

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 62.7 PMC-VQA (Table 6) Health

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%