PhysicianBench
100 physician tasks performed by an agent inside an EHR environment. Scored by pass rate per attempt.
In the authors’ words
We introduce PhysicianBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on physician tasks grounded in real clinical setting within electronic health record (EHR) environments. Existing medical agent benchmarks primarily focus on static knowledge recall, single-step atomic actions, or action intent without verifiable execution against the environment. As a result, they fail to capture the long-horizon, composite workflows that characterize real clinical systems. PhysicianBench comprises 100 long-horizon tasks adapted from real consultation cases between primary care and subspecialty physicians, with each task independently reviewed by a separate panel of physicians. Tasks are instantiated in an EHR environment with real patient records and accessed through the same standard APIs used by commercial EHR vendors. Tasks span 21 specialties (e.g., cardiology, endocrinology, oncology, psychiatry) and diverse workflow types (e.g., diagnosis interpretation, medication prescribing, treatment planning), requiring an average of 27 tool calls per task. Solving each task requires retrieving data across encounters, reasoning over heterogeneous clinical information, executing consequential clinical actions, and producing clinical documentation. Each task is decomposed into structured checkpoints (670 in total across the benchmark) capturing distinct stages of completion graded by task-specific scripts with execution-grounded verification. Across 13 proprietary and open-source LLM agents, the best-performing model achieves only 46% success rate (pass@1), while open-source models reach at most 19%, revealing a substantial gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of real-world clinical workflows. PhysicianBench provides a realistic and execution-grounded benchmark for measuring progress toward autonomous clinical agents.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 50% among models released by Jul 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 1 GPT-5.6 Sol 50%
- 2 GPT-5.5 46.3%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 31.7%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.7 29.3%
- 5 GPT-5.4 27.7%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 23%
- 7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 18.7%
- 8 Kimi K2.6 17%
- 9 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 16.7%
- 10
Qwen 3.6 Plus 13.7%
- 11
MiniMax-M2.7 8.70%
- 12
Gemini 3.1 Pro 6.00%
- 13 Grok 4.20 5.30%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 50% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 | 46.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 31.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 29.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 | 27.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 23% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 18.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Kimi K2.6 | 17% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 16.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 13.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 8.70% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 6.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Grok 4.20 | 5.30% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 43 | PhysicianBench, share of attempts passed, max effort (Figure 8.11.2.A) | Health |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 63.2 | PhysicianBench pass@1 at max effort (8.15.3, Figure 8.15.B) | Health |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%