PharmaBench (micro1)
Agents write clinical trial documentation inside 8 synthetic drug programs, across 120 tasks written by biostatisticians, medical writers, safety physicians and regulatory staff.
Penalties subtract for content an expert would have to remove. Full marks were rare, 17.2% of runs for the best model. Not the 2024 PharmaBench of ADMET data.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 27.5%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 27.5%
- 2
Muse Wonder 17.2%
- 3 GPT-6 Astra 16.1%
- 4
Muse Spark 1.3 13.9%
- 5 Claude Fable 5.1 12.8%
- 6 Grok 4.6 12.5%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 11.4%
- 8 Claude Opus 5.5 10.8%
- 9
Muse Spark 1.1 9.70%
- 10 Claude Opus 5 9.70%
- 11
Gemini 4 Argon 8.60%
- 12
Gemini 3.8 Flash 5.60%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 27.5% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 17.2% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra | 16.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 13.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 12.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Grok 4.6 | 12.5% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 11.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 9.70% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5 | 9.70% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 8.60% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 5.60% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%