Phare
Models are probed in English, French and Spanish for hallucination, harmful misguidance, stereotypes and jailbreaks. Hallucination tasks cover factuality, misinformation, debunking and tool use.
Announced 2025-02 with Google DeepMind as research partner. Phare V2 (2025-12-16) added a jailbreak module and self-harm tests with the same method. The board lists about 70 models.
In the authors’ words
Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) is critical for responsible deployment, yet existing evaluations often prioritize performance over identifying failure modes. We introduce Phare, a multilingual diagnostic framework to probe and evaluate LLM behavior across three critical dimensions: hallucination and reliability, social biases, and harmful content generation. Our evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals patterns of systematic vulnerabilities across all safety dimensions, including sycophancy, prompt sensitivity, and stereotype reproduction. By highlighting these specific failure modes rather than simply ranking models, Phare provides researchers and practitioners with actionable insights to build more robust, aligned, and trustworthy language systems.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 83.2% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 15 more
- 83.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 82.4 Claude Opus 4.5
- 78.1 Claude Sonnet 5
- 77.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 76.9 Claude Opus 4.1
- 76.4
Llama 3.1-405B
- 76.1 Kimi K2.6
- 75.6
Qwen3.7-Max
- 74.1 Claude Opus 4.6
- 74.1
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 74.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 73.3
Gemini 3 Pro
- 73.2 GPT-5 mini
- 72.8 GPT-5.1
- 71.0 GPT-5.2
- 70.8
Llama 4 Maverick
- 70.7 GPT-4o
- 70.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 70.5 GPT-5.5
- 70.5 GPT-4.1 mini
- 69.9 GLM-5.2
- 69.5 GPT-5 nano
- 69.5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 69.1 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 68.8
Qwen Plus
- 68.6 Grok 4.3
- 67.5
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 67.4 Gemma 4
- 67.2 GPT-5
- 67.1 GPT-4.1
- 67.0 Kimi K2.5
- 66.5 Grok 4 Fast
- 66.1 gpt-oss-120b
- 65.9
Qwen3-Max
- 64.8
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 64.5
Mistral Small 3.2
- 64.3
Mistral Medium 3.5
- 64.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 63.9
Qwen3-8B
- 63.8
Llama 4 Scout
- 63.7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 63.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 62.5
Llama 3.1-8B
- 62.3
Magistral Medium 1.0
- 62.2
DeepSeek-V3
- 62.2
Qwen2.5-Max
- 62.1 Grok 4
- 62.0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 60.9
Mistral Large 3
- 60.9
Cohere Command A
- 60.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 60.0 Grok-3 mini
- 59.3 Qwen 3 30B VL Instruct
- 58.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 58.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 58.8
Mistral Large 2
- 58.5
DeepSeek-R1
- 58.3 GPT-4o mini
- 58.1
Mistral Medium
- 57.5 GPT-4.1 nano
- 57.4
Gemma 3 27B
- 57.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 55.9 Magistral Small Latest
- 55.7 Gemma 3 12B IT
- 54.6 Grok-2
- 53.5 Grok 3
- 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 83.2%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.5 82.4%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 5 78.1%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.6%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.1 76.9%
- 6
Llama 3.1-405B 76.4%
- 7 Kimi K2.6 76.1%
- 8
Qwen3.7-Max 75.6%
- 9 Claude Opus 4.6 74.1%
- 10
Qwen3.7-Plus 74.1%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 74%
- 12
Gemini 3 Pro 73.3%
- 13 GPT-5 mini 73.2%
- 14 GPT-5.1 72.8%
- 15 GPT-5.2 71%
- 16
Llama 4 Maverick 70.8%
- 17 GPT-4o Mar 2025 70.7%
- 18
Gemini 3.1 Pro 70.6%
- 19 GPT-5.5 70.5%
- 20 GPT-4.1 mini 70.5%
- 21 GLM-5.2 69.9%
- 22 GPT-5 nano 69.5%
- 23 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 69.5%
- 24 Claude 3.5 Haiku 69.1%
- 25
Qwen Plus Apr 2025 68.8%
- 26 Grok 4.3 68.6%
- 27
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 67.5%
- 28 Gemma 4 67.4%
- 29 GPT-5 67.2%
- 30 GPT-4.1 67.1%
- 31 Kimi K2.5 67%
- 32 Grok 4 Fast non-reasoning 66.5%
- 33 gpt-oss-120b 66.1%
- 34
Qwen3-Max 65.9%
- 35
DeepSeek-V3.1 64.8%
- 36
Mistral Small 3.2 64.5%
- 37
Mistral Medium 3.5 64.3%
- 38
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 64.2%
- 39
Qwen3-8B 63.9%
- 40
Llama 4 Scout 63.8%
- 41
DeepSeek-V4-Flash 63.7%
- 42
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 63.6%
- 43
Llama 3.1-8B 62.5%
- 44
Magistral Medium 1.0 62.3%
- 45
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 62.2%
- 46
Qwen2.5-Max 62.2%
- 47 Grok 4 62.1%
- 48
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 62%
- 49
Mistral Large 3 60.9%
- 50
Cohere Command A 60.9%
- 51
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 60.5%
- 52 Grok-3 mini 60%
- 53 Qwen 3 30B VL Instruct 59.3%
- 54
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 58.9%
- 55
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 58.9%
- 56
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 58.8%
- 57
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 58.5%
- 58 GPT-4o mini 58.3%
- 59
Mistral Medium 58.1%
- 60 GPT-4.1 nano 57.5%
- 61
Gemma 3 27B 57.4%
- 62
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.3%
- 63 Magistral Small Latest 55.9%
- 64 Gemma 3 12B IT 55.7%
- 65 Grok-2 Dec 2024 54.6%
- 66 Grok 3 53.5%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 83.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 82.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 78.1% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 77.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 76.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 76.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Kimi K2.6 | 76.1% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 75.6% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 74.1% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 74.1% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 74% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 73.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-5 mini | 73.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-5.1 | 72.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | GPT-5.2 | 71% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 70.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 70.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 70.6% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | GPT-5.5 | 70.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | GPT-4.1 mini | 70.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GLM-5.2 | 69.9% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | GPT-5 nano | 69.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 69.5% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 69.1% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 68.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Grok 4.3 | 68.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 67.5% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Gemma 4 | 67.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | GPT-5 | 67.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GPT-4.1 | 67.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Kimi K2.5 | 67% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Grok 4 Fast | 66.5% | non-reasoning | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | gpt-oss-120b | 66.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 65.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 64.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 64.5% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 64.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 64.2% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 63.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 63.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 63.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 63.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 62.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 62.3% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 62.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 62.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | Grok 4 | 62.1% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 62% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 60.9% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 60.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 60.5% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | Grok-3 mini | 60% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Qwen 3 30B VL Instruct | 59.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 54 | | 58.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 58.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 58.8% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | | 58.5% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | GPT-4o mini | 58.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 58.1% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | GPT-4.1 nano | 57.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | | 57.4% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 57.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | Magistral Small Latest | 55.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 64 | Gemma 3 12B IT | 55.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 65 | Grok-2 Dec 2024 | 54.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | Grok 3 | 53.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
4 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
- RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%