Benchmark Almanac

Phare

Claude Haiku 4.5 83.2% leads since Oct 2025 Not in model cards

Models are probed in English, French and Spanish for hallucination, harmful misguidance, stereotypes and jailbreaks. Hallucination tasks cover factuality, misinformation, debunking and tool use.

Announced 2025-02 with Google DeepMind as research partner. Phare V2 (2025-12-16) added a jailbreak module and self-harm tests with the same method. The board lists about 70 models.

In the authors’ words

Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) is critical for responsible deployment, yet existing evaluations often prioritize performance over identifying failure modes. We introduce Phare, a multilingual diagnostic framework to probe and evaluate LLM behavior across three critical dimensions: hallucination and reliability, social biases, and harmful content generation. Our evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals patterns of systematic vulnerabilities across all safety dimensions, including sycophancy, prompt sensitivity, and stereotype reproduction. By highlighting these specific failure modes rather than simply ranking models, Phare provides researchers and practitioners with actionable insights to build more robust, aligned, and trustworthy language systems.

Abstract of Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models (arXiv:2505.11365, CC0)
Made by Giskard Released Feb 2025 Hallucination rates Public tasks plus a private test set Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
66
Entries on its own leaderboard, 62 models we track

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 83.2% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 83.2%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.5 82.4%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 5 78.1%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.6%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.1 76.9%
  6. 6 Llama 3.1-405B 76.4%
  7. 7 Kimi K2.6 76.1%
  8. 8 Qwen3.7-Max 75.6%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4.6 74.1%
  10. 10 Qwen3.7-Plus 74.1%
  11. 11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 74%
  12. 12 Gemini 3 Pro 73.3%
  13. 13 GPT-5 mini 73.2%
  14. 14 GPT-5.1 72.8%
  15. 15 GPT-5.2 71%
  16. 16 Llama 4 Maverick 70.8%
  17. 17 GPT-4o Mar 2025 70.7%
  18. 18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 70.6%
  19. 19 GPT-5.5 70.5%
  20. 20 GPT-4.1 mini 70.5%
  21. 21 GLM-5.2 69.9%
  22. 22 GPT-5 nano 69.5%
  23. 23 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 69.5%
  24. 24 Claude 3.5 Haiku 69.1%
  25. 25 Qwen Plus Apr 2025 68.8%
  26. 26 Grok 4.3 68.6%
  27. 27 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 67.5%
  28. 28 Gemma 4 67.4%
  29. 29 GPT-5 67.2%
  30. 30 GPT-4.1 67.1%
  31. 31 Kimi K2.5 67%
  32. 32 Grok 4 Fast non-reasoning 66.5%
  33. 33 gpt-oss-120b 66.1%
  34. 34 Qwen3-Max 65.9%
  35. 35 DeepSeek-V3.1 64.8%
  36. 36 Mistral Small 3.2 64.5%
  37. 37 Mistral Medium 3.5 64.3%
  38. 38 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 64.2%
  39. 39 Qwen3-8B 63.9%
  40. 40 Llama 4 Scout 63.8%
  41. 41 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 63.7%
  42. 42 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 63.6%
  43. 43 Llama 3.1-8B 62.5%
  44. 44 Magistral Medium 1.0 62.3%
  45. 45 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 62.2%
  46. 46 Qwen2.5-Max 62.2%
  47. 47 Grok 4 62.1%
  48. 48 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 62%
  49. 49 Mistral Large 3 60.9%
  50. 50 Cohere Command A 60.9%
  51. 51 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 60.5%
  52. 52 Grok-3 mini 60%
  53. 53 Qwen 3 30B VL Instruct 59.3%
  54. 54 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 58.9%
  55. 55 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 58.9%
  56. 56 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 58.8%
  57. 57 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 58.5%
  58. 58 GPT-4o mini 58.3%
  59. 59 Mistral Medium 58.1%
  60. 60 GPT-4.1 nano 57.5%
  61. 61 Gemma 3 27B 57.4%
  62. 62 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.3%
  63. 63 Magistral Small Latest 55.9%
  64. 64 Gemma 3 12B IT 55.7%
  65. 65 Grok-2 Dec 2024 54.6%
  66. 66 Grok 3 53.5%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Haiku 4.5 83.2% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 4.5 82.4% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 5 78.1% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.1 76.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Llama 3.1-405B 76.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Kimi K2.6 76.1% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.7-Max 75.6% May 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4.6 74.1% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3.7-Plus 74.1% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 74% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3 Pro 73.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-5 mini 73.2% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5.1 72.8% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5.2 71% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Llama 4 Maverick 70.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4o Mar 2025 70.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 70.6% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-5.5 70.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-4.1 mini 70.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
21 GLM-5.2 69.9% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
22 GPT-5 nano 69.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 69.5% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Claude 3.5 Haiku 69.1% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen Plus Apr 2025 68.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Grok 4.3 68.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 67.5% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
28 Gemma 4 67.4% Official leaderboard
29 GPT-5 67.2% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
30 GPT-4.1 67.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Kimi K2.5 67% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Grok 4 Fast 66.5% non-reasoning Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
33 gpt-oss-120b 66.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen3-Max 65.9% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
35 DeepSeek-V3.1 64.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Mistral Small 3.2 64.5% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Mistral Medium 3.5 64.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
38 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 64.2% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
39 Qwen3-8B 63.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
40 Llama 4 Scout 63.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
41 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 63.7% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
42 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 63.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
43 Llama 3.1-8B 62.5% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
44 Magistral Medium 1.0 62.3% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
45 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 62.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
46 Qwen2.5-Max 62.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
47 Grok 4 62.1% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
48 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 62% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
49 Mistral Large 3 60.9% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
50 Cohere Command A 60.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
51 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 60.5% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
52 Grok-3 mini 60% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
53 Qwen 3 30B VL Instruct 59.3% Official leaderboard
54 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 58.9% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
55 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 58.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
56 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 58.8% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
57 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 58.5% May 2025 Official leaderboard
58 GPT-4o mini 58.3% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
59 Mistral Medium 58.1% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
60 GPT-4.1 nano 57.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
61 Gemma 3 27B 57.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
62 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
63 Magistral Small Latest 55.9% Official leaderboard
64 Gemma 3 12B IT 55.7% Official leaderboard
65 Grok-2 Dec 2024 54.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
66 Grok 3 53.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

4 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Llama 3.1-405B GPT-4o mini Mistral Medium 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4.1

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Factuality

All 70 in Factuality
  • SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references. Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
  • HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy. Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
  • SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
  • GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
  • Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
  • RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%