Benchmark Almanac

PCT (Polarized Contrastive Pairs)

Muse Spark 1.1 27.9% leads since Jul 2026 Not in model cards

Models answer matched left-coded and right-coded prompts, such as Obama and Reagan. Judges score whether sentiment and helpfulness stay consistent across each pair.

Political Consistency is the mean of Sentiment Consistency and Helpfulness Consistency. CAIS runs it on its AI Dashboard as part of the risk index and in simple-evals.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic political bias across a variety of sensitive contexts. We find that LLMs handle counterpart topics from opposing political sides asymmetrically. We refer to this phenomenon as covert political bias and identify 7 categories of techniques through which it operates. We propose two metrics for covert bias: Sentiment Consistency measures symmetry in rhetoric and framing across paired political prompts; Helpfulness Consistency measures symmetric depth and engagement. To reduce both types of covert bias, we introduce Political Consistency Training (PCT), an RL training method with two complementary paradigms: Sentiment Consistency Training and Helpfulness Consistency Training. We show that PCT preserves overall helpfulness, substantially reduces covert political bias, and generalizes to held-out benchmarks. We release our work at https://political-manipulation.ai

Abstract of Reducing Political Manipulation with Consistency Training (arXiv:2605.22771, CC0)
Made by Center for AI Safety Released May 2026 Bias, fairness and politics All tasks public Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
46
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Muse Spark 1.1 leads with 27.9%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Muse Spark 1.1 high 27.9%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 high 29.1%
  3. 3 Grok 4 Fast 30.8%
  4. 4 Grok 4.1 Fast 32.5%
  5. 5 Muse Wonder high 33.3%
  6. 6 Claude Fable 5.1 high 33.4%
  7. 7 GPT-5 high 35.3%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 5 high 36.7%
  9. 9 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, high 37.3%
  10. 10 GPT-6.1 Sol high 37.3%
  11. 11 GPT-6 Astra high 37.4%
  12. 12 Gemini 4 Argon high 38.7%
  13. 13 o3 high 39%
  14. 14 Claude Fable 5 high 39.8%
  15. 15 Grok 4.20 39.9%
  16. 16 GPT-5.5 high 40%
  17. 17 Muse Spark 1.3 high 40.6%
  18. 18 Muse Spark Open high 41.3%
  19. 19 GPT-5.6 Sol high 41.7%
  20. 20 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 42.2%
  21. 21 Kimi K2.6 43.6%
  22. 22 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 44%
  23. 23 GPT-5.6 Luna high 44.7%
  24. 24 Gemini 3.7 Flash high 45.1%
  25. 25 GPT-5.6 Terra high 46.2%
  26. 26 Gemini 3.8 Flash high 46.3%
  27. 27 GLM-5.3 46.8%
  28. 28 Kimi K3 high 47.6%
  29. 29 GPT-5.1 high 47.9%
  30. 30 Claude Opus 4.7 48.2%
  31. 31 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 49.4%
  32. 32 Grok 4 49.5%
  33. 33 GLM-5.2 50%
  34. 34 Grok 4.5 50.2%
  35. 35 Grok 4.3 51.6%
  36. 36 Claude Opus 4.6 51.7%
  37. 37 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite high 51.9%
  38. 38 Gemini 3.5 Flash 53.4%
  39. 39 Claude Opus 4.8 high 53.8%
  40. 40 Grok 4.6 55.4%
  41. 41 GPT-5.2 high 57%
  42. 42 GPT-5.4 high 59.4%
  43. 43 GPT-4o Nov 2024 59.6%
  44. 44 GPT-5.4 Mini high 61.1%
  45. 45 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 62.2%
  46. 46 GPT-5.4 Nano high 63.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Spark 1.1 27.9% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5.5 29.1% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Grok 4 Fast 30.8% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Grok 4.1 Fast 32.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Muse Wonder 33.3% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Fable 5.1 33.4% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-5 35.3% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 5 36.7% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 37.3% high Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-6.1 Sol 37.3% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-6 Astra 37.4% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 4 Argon 38.7% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
13 o3 39% high Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Fable 5 39.8% high Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Grok 4.20 39.9% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-5.5 40% high Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Muse Spark 1.3 40.6% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Muse Spark Open 41.3% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-5.6 Sol 41.7% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini 3.1 Pro 42.2% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Kimi K2.6 43.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
22 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 44% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-5.6 Luna 44.7% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Gemini 3.7 Flash 45.1% high Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
25 GPT-5.6 Terra 46.2% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
26 Gemini 3.8 Flash 46.3% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
27 GLM-5.3 46.8% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
28 Kimi K3 47.6% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
29 GPT-5.1 47.9% high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Claude Opus 4.7 48.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
31 Claude Opus 4.5 49.4% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
32 Grok 4 49.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
33 GLM-5.2 50% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
34 Grok 4.5 50.2% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
35 Grok 4.3 51.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
36 Claude Opus 4.6 51.7% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
37 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 51.9% high Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
38 Gemini 3.5 Flash 53.4% May 2026 Official leaderboard
39 Claude Opus 4.8 53.8% high May 2026 Official leaderboard
40 Grok 4.6 55.4% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
41 GPT-5.2 57% high Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
42 GPT-5.4 59.4% high Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
43 GPT-4o Nov 2024 59.6% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
44 GPT-5.4 Mini 61.1% high Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
45 Claude Haiku 4.5 62.2% thinking Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
46 GPT-5.4 Nano 63.3% high Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

xAI Meta
Own leaderboard 2 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4 Fast GPT-5 GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%