Benchmark Almanac

$OneMillion-Bench

Claude Fable 5.1 42.1% leads since Sep 2026 In use

Agent solves 400 expert-curated tasks in law, finance, industry, healthcare and science. Rubric grading of accuracy, logic, feasibility and compliance.

NeurIPS 2026. Qwen reports an expert score judged by gemini-3.1-pro-preview.

In the authors’ words

As language models (LMs) evolve from chat assistants to long-horizon agents capable of multi-step reasoning and tool use, existing benchmarks remain largely confined to structured or exam-style tasks that fall short of real-world professional demands. To this end, we introduce $OneMillion-Bench ($OMB), a benchmark of 400 expert-curated tasks spanning Law, Finance, Industry, Healthcare, and Natural Science, built to evaluate agents across economically consequential scenarios. Unlike prior work, the benchmark requires retrieving authoritative sources, resolving conflicting evidence, applying domain-specific rules, and making constraint decisions, where correctness depends as much on the reasoning process as the final answer. We adopt a rubric-based evaluation protocol scoring factual accuracy, logical coherence, practical feasibility, and professional compliance, focusing on expert-level problems to ensure meaningful differentiation across agents. Together, $OMB provides a unified testbed for assessing agentic reliability, professional depth, and an indicator of practical readiness in domain-intensive scenarios.

Abstract of $OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts? (arXiv:2603.07980, CC0)
Made by Humanlaya + BIGAI + xbench Released Mar 2026 Tasks from real jobs All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
13
Models scored on its own leaderboard
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude Fable 5.1 leads with 42.1% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5.1 42.1%
  2. 2 Tencent Hy4 preview 35.3%
  3. 3 Kimi K3 35%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol Pro 32.2%
  5. 5 Qwen 3.8 Max 31.9%
  6. 6 GLM-5.3 31%
  7. 7 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 26%
  8. 8 Seed2.1 Pro 23.7%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5%
  10. 10 Inkling 22.1%
  11. 11 Gemini 3.5 Flash 17%
  12. 12 Grok 4.5 15.8%
  13. 13 Tencent Hy3 13%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5.1 42.1% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Tencent Hy4 preview 35.3% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Kimi K3 35% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol Pro 32.2% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen 3.8 Max 31.9% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-5.3 31% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 26% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Seed2.1 Pro 23.7% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Inkling 22.1% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 3.5 Flash 17% May 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Grok 4.5 15.8% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Tencent Hy3 13% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

5 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

DeepSeek OpenAI Moonshot AI Tencent Anthropic ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2026
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 68.8%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro DeepSeek-V4-Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro DeepSeek-V4-Pro

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
28 Aug 2026 Tencent Hy4 preview 65.4 OneMillionBench (with tools)
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 52.5 $OneMillion-Bench (expert score)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 68.8 OneMillion Bench (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Economic work

All 91 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%