Benchmark Almanac

Omnilingual-Gaia2

Muse Glimmer 60.4% Only in system cards

Agents run Gaia2 execution, search, ambiguity and adaptability scenarios translated into 10 languages, graded against the scenario oracle with multilingual judge prompts.

Meta says a correct non-English answer is often scored as a miss without the multilingual judge prompt. Dataset created 2026-08-11.

Made by Meta (FAIR) Released Aug 2026 Chat and instructions in many languages All tasks public Last in a system card Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Muse Glimmer leads with 60.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Muse Glimmer 60.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Glimmer 60.4% Oct 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Glimmer 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Glimmer

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 60.4 Omnilingual GAIA2, target mean over 10 languages, high (Tables 2, 5 and 7) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%